What do you guys think?

well said!!

Thanks guys. I love how I look and honestly I carry it well. I can't imagine being 90-100 lbs again. I really wasn't healthy but now I really feel great. I'm not tired all the time and have more energy then before. Besides last time I checked a size 3 wasn't fat. Lol

You do know that not a single guy here knows what a size 3 is, right?

FAP FAP FAP

You do know that not a single guy here knows what a size 3 is, right? Originally Posted by watchoutthegameisrigged

Lol your probably right.

Well, having had the opportunity to see you up close and personal I think you look great. I would have assumed you're around 100lbs anyway, frankly. Anything smaller on such a tiny frame I can imagine would be challenging to maintain healthfully. I can imagine if you are used to being kinda skinny that seeing a slight difference in the mirror can make you wonder, but there's no way you're even approaching fat and or anything like that. You look healthy and good. It's very very sexy. And, um, as I recall the genuineness of that statement was physically apparent immediately from my side as soon as I was able to see you au naturel. That's not exactly normal for me upon meeting someone new, so I would say that my statements above can be viewed as an honest fact based statement backed up by physical proof of my honesty. Whew! I gotta stop writing because I have to get ready for work and I'm getting all hot and bothered thinking about what you look like!

Why do people jump to defense of women and their weight but no one jumps to the defense of a short man? Short men are discriminated against just like overweight women. I am not saying that you are overweight “T” because I haven’t seen you since you gain your weight.

Thanks guys. I love how I look and honestly I carry it well. I can't imagine being 90-100 lbs again. I really wasn't healthy but now I really feel great. I'm not tired all the time and have more energy then before. Besides last time I checked a size 3 wasn't fat. Lol Originally Posted by Trinity Kane

It's not babe, a size 3 is small! For the guys that don't know women's sizes, I wear a 6.

I do believe you ladies may be selling us guys a little short here. I think I could do very well in accurately diagnosing the particular size of a woman. Would I be correct if I said that there is even a size "0"? Sorry short guys, ladies can always lose weight but short will always be short!

I do believe you ladies may be selling us guys a little short here. I think I could do very well in accurately diagnosing the particular size of a woman. Would I be correct if I said that there is even a size "0"? Sorry short guys, ladies can always lose weight but short will always be short! Originally Posted by RokJohnson

Short guys can stand on their money.

Short guys can stand on their money. Originally Posted by theotherguy1

Love it! Lol!!

Yes, RokJohnson... There is a size 0. Women's sizes start at 0, then 2, 4, 6, 8... To further confuse you guys, the odd numbers represent juniors. (3, 5, 7...)

I was down to a size 4 last summer, but friends were telling me it was too small for my frame. Height has a lot to do with it. Sorry TOG, I know that's a sensitive subject for ya.

Short guys can stand on their money. Originally Posted by theotherguy1

ha
good one.

must be why i'm feeling a little short these days.
damn outstanding invoices

What exactly is it that's keeping tall people from standing on their money also. By no means do I claim to know other people's financial situation, however, statistics show that a men should expect to earn an additional $789 a year more for every inch over 5'5" he is. So a man 6' on average should earn $5,525 more than his counterpart who measures 5'5". Over a lifetime that will add up to hundreds of thousands more after compounding year to year differences in salary. So actually, shorter people's stack of cash is also a little short. Just sayin

What exactly is it that's keeping tall people from standing on their money also. By no means do I claim to know other people's financial situation, however, statistics show that a men should expect to earn an additional $789 a year more for every inch over 5'5" he is. So a man 6' on average should earn $5,525 more than his counterpart who measures 5'5". Over a lifetime that will add up to hundreds of thousands more after compounding year to year differences in salary. So actually, shorter people's stack of cash is also a little short. Just sayin Originally Posted by RokJohnson

I believe that is an accurate statement but the thing to consider is the Napoleon Complex. Which is not a real condition but statistics shows that more conquerors have been less than 5'6".

The other thing that keeps tall people from standing on their money is they keep falling off.