47 counts of Treason

I don't defend IB either. This entire forum is filled with children that couldn't carry on an adult conversation if their life depended on it. I like reading the various opinions in this forum and some good points are made by both sides. I am a conservative so naturally I agree with the right much more than the left but the problem is damn near every thread becomes a stupid little game of "I know I am but what are you" carried on by juveniles. The original debate is over. Originally Posted by Budman

Yeah, you're not entirely wrong. You should go back and read some more of the stuff I post. I'll talk to you like an adult if I feel like you are one.

Majority of the people on these forums are shit tossers, so don't single me out as the one who's starting it. As soon as they realize their opinion might be on the losing side or might not hold weight, the shit starts to fly. Then guess what happens?

I've apologized when I've made factual errors. I've also admitted when people's viewpoints might hold more water than mine. Can you say the same for the rest of your buddies?

Ishanm and undercunt are just paid Soros Media Matters Socialist astroturfer scum here to promote the Cankle Queen and Hussein Ofatwa.

^ Case in point

Ishanm and undercunt are just paid Soros Media Matters Socialist astroturfer scum here to promote the Cankle Queen and Hussein Ofatwa. Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Soros is scum. Any more theories?

^ Case in point Originally Posted by shanm

Agreed. Just don't play the game. Nobody ever wins.

Unless it is a Treaty negotiated by The Executive Branch, with advice and consent from the Senate, (this is a Constitutional Process), it is just as the Republican Senators say, a agreement between two leaders that can be undone by the next leader. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Correct!

And it is a Treaty. Nobody can argue otherwise.

Article 2, section 2, clause 2 of the US Constitution states...

"He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;"

Agreed. Just don't play the game. Nobody ever wins. Originally Posted by Budman

Right on. It's too much fun sometimes though.

Correct!

And it is a Treaty. Nobody can argue otherwise.

Article 2, section 2, clause 2 of the US Constitution states...

"He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;" Originally Posted by gfejunkie

But it's not the legislative branch that does the negotiating. They're simply taking any chance they can to poke him in the eye, best thing for the country be damned.

Yeah, you're not entirely wrong. You should go back and read some more of the stuff I post. I'll talk to you like an adult if I feel like you are one.

Majority of the people on these forums are shit tossers, so don't single me out as the one who's starting it. As soon as they realize their opinion might be on the losing side or might not hold weight, the shit starts to fly. Then guess what happens?

I've apologized when I've made factual errors. I've also admitted when people's viewpoints might hold more water than mine. Can you say the same for the rest of your buddies? Originally Posted by shanm

You're a liar, shamman, you DON'T apologize when you make factual errors, and it would be easy to post a half-dozen or so examples (e.g., the Crusades, the A-Bombs, etc.) of where you never apologized for being factually wrong -- and where you preened and bragged inspite of being factually wrong!

You're a liar, shamman, you DON'T apologize when you make factual errors, and it would be easy to post a half-dozen or so examples (e.g., the Crusades, the A-Bombs, etc.) of where you never apologized for being factually wrong -- and where you preened and bragged inspite of being factually wrong! Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Here comes the inevitable.

They're simply taking any chance they can to poke him in the eye Originally Posted by UnderConstruction

More like a warning shot to let him know who holds the cards.

Here comes the inevitable. Originally Posted by shanm

The "inevitable" was that you wouldn't apologize for your factual errors, shamman.

More like a warning shot to let him know who holds the cards. Originally Posted by gfejunkie

Not really.

Still waiting for the day when one of them steps out calls Obama a Ni**er. Originally Posted by shanm

You mean like Jesse Jackson did?

You've been disappointed for the last 6.5 years so you have to project your racism. Typical.

You mean like Jesse Jackson did? Originally Posted by gnadfly

Jackson is black...