'A Pimps Lil Black Book'

Nice info, but with no names, doesn't do us alot of good. Originally Posted by JS42
No but some already eliminated and it is a provider with a pimp - so that eliminates some more.
FrankieP's Avatar
Process of elimination. Only one shooter left that can think of...
Unique_Carpenter's Avatar
Nice info, but with no names, doesn't do us alot of good. Originally Posted by JS42
I disagree JS. This has heightened everyone's awareness that there is an issue, and Gemma outlined that item.
I consider this a valid issue as more than one person I implicitly trust has posted in this thread.
Frankie, there's still a couple left to hear from.
...and Scorpio has laid out ECCIE's vested interest. Originally Posted by zeejoe
You nailed it.

Well the eight legged anthropod that stings knows how to play the shell game very well. Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter
When one knows which shell the pearl is hidden under, it makes the game much simpler and winning percentages go up dramatically.
Thank u for saying something Gemma. This does need to be addressed.
JS42's Avatar
  • JS42
  • 07-28-2015, 04:39 PM
Never said it wasn't valid. Guess the process of elimination is on.

It sounds like this is somebody who had you fooled...and you're pissed...

Righteously so.

fine...but huggy bear/boyfriend/manager/pimp/suitcase pimp/whatever isn't going to out himself

No but I bet others know--I have no evidential facts to support this. So I don't want to publicly post his name.

"NOW clients--imagine this...Your ATF, of whom you are corresponding with, is actually a pimp. Wait, WHAT?... you've just given out your address to YOUR safe and private home or business. So now this cockroach has your real name, handle, address, email, phone number and maybe even your employer and your car make/model/color. "

Mind you, this is coming from somebody who uses dozens and dozens of P411 okays and TER WhiteLists to tcb, so I read: and I think WHO THE ACTUAL FUCK DOES THAT???
Enquiring minds and all that... Originally Posted by zeejoe
The things ppl talk about when corresponding in private...
KenMonk's Avatar
This is getting all sorts of juicy
I think everyone would agree this is a valid concern. And everyone would agree that this must be addressed. But JS is right, without a name, all we're good for is conjecture...

This is like that thread a while back where a john claimed he got a STD from a provider and that other johns had PM'd him that they too had the same experience with this provider. But. Without a name everyone just wondered if it was someone they had seen. Sucked not knowing...

Personally have no clue so I can't help - sorry...

But would love to know if I need to re-work the short list...

Hopefully someone in the know will come forward and share...
Yeah, without names, we can't protect ourselves–from pimps or std's.

This is the type of protection we're all looking for here. It's about trust.

I'm working to arrange a meeting for tomorrow with a local favorite and now I'm worried.
Ok it aint Binksy...it aint @rlo726
Actually I didn't think it was

HMMMM
Okay, so Gemma's opened up the throttle on the flamethrower (Welcome back, ya' little pyro, BTW) and Scorpio has laid out ECCIE's vested interest.

Gemma, it sounds like you're the one who's in the position to name names here.

It sounds like this is somebody who had you fooled...and you're pissed...fine...but huggy bear/boyfriend/manager/pimp/suitcase pimp/whatever isn't going to out himself.... and guys ..... no matter how picky we think we are, we're still the ones knowingly shuffling into a hotel room ready to take part in a prima facie illegal enterprise.
Mind you, this is coming from somebody who uses dozens and dozens of P411 okays and TER WhiteLists to tcb, so I read: and I think WHO THE ACTUAL FUCK DOES THAT???
Enquiring minds and all that... Originally Posted by zeejoe
Yeah, no shit. If a provider needed that from me, fuck it - there's other providers.

And without names this is more typical Eccie passive-aggressive bullshit. The idea behind not providing a name isn't to narrow the field - it's to widen it....so every guy thinks that every provider is the one being referred to.
Oh Kshunter, I'm anything but typical my dear. Lariyah-- why don't you answer your own reference checks??
KenMonk's Avatar
Welp, that solves that.
Uh oh, shit just got real.