CP is this not CensorShip

Good stuff. Vote for BAMA all your wildest dreams will come true
hotrix1's Avatar
Was never my intention to run for office. No inclination there. All I ever wanted was to have a clean and undisturbed playground that nobody takes a shit in ijust because they feel like it, whenever they feel like it. No political aspirations here.
I'd rather have my pussy provider without the hype and the hoopla and fuck my brains out into oblivion without all the games people play. I'm better off that way.
Jjsunday's Avatar
ya I am like hotrix

I would rather be rubbing a nice ass and set of tit's
laying in the bed talking for a while and not being CenSored and then jumping right in the middle of thing's !

and then talking a little more Uncensored !
Yeah what they said. But still if u vote for me all your dreams will come true!
hotrix1's Avatar
Yeah what they said. But still if u vote for me all your dreams will come true! Originally Posted by bamadog78

Coed Discussions - Panhandle Hobby-related discussions belong here. Let's keep these discussions on-topic, thought-provoking, and more importantly...entertaining

Other than the nightmares some of the girls tell me about you coming true, this thread has certainly been thought-provoking, and more importantly...entertaining. LOL

Even in the worst of my rants, my post have been no less thought-provoking(even if it did provoke some of the less intelligent and uninformed to respond in anger) and definitely entertaining for the most part. And most importantly informative. Even a satirical and lyrical farewell to an unwelcome fraud in ridicule, was to inform the community of his departure.
Why close that thread or censor it?
Jjsunday's Avatar
Coed Discussions - Panhandle Hobby-related discussions belong here. Let's keep these discussions on-topic, thought-provoking, and more importantly...entertaining

Other than the nightmares some of the girls tell me about you coming true, this thread has certainly been thought-provoking, and more importantly...entertaining. LOL

Even in the worst of my rants, my post have been no less thought-provoking(even if it did provoke some of the less intelligent and uninformed to respond in anger) and definitely entertaining for the most part. And most importantly informative. Even a satirical and lyrical farewell to an unwelcome fraud in ridicule, was to inform the community of his departure.
Why close that thread or censor it? Originally Posted by hotrix1

Good Question Why was this thread Censored ??????

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1837928

what Rules did it Brake to get Censored ?????

I get so Confuessed !!!!

#3 - Disrespect to others, IN GENERAL, will be considered an item of low tolerance, especially when posting in our coed forums. Follow the Golden Rule and treat others as you wish to be treated yourself. This applies to fellow members as well as staff. We do not require that you have respect for us, but we do require that you treat us respectfully in the public forums. If you feel the need to vent, gripe, or blow off some steam regarding a staff member's action or decision, we ask that you keep it private. Email, RTM, or the PM system would be the appropriate avenue to take in such cases. In cases where you would like to request additional clarity about a staff decision, you are free to pursue an answer in either a public forum or private means of communication. If handled publicly, post your inquiry in a respectful manner
Publically yalls opinion are no longer debatable as the person in question is no longer here and thus unable to defend the accusations made---now anyone's perspective is really just an editorial opinion based perception leading towards a unarguable conclusion---it's over---it's still interesting, but it's over non the less---this debate may be better suited for a chat session as there is only a very small group of people that are interested.
Jjsunday's Avatar
Publically yalls opinion are no longer debatable as the person in question is no longer here and thus unable to defend the accusations made---now anyone's perspective is really just an editorial opinion based perception leading towards a unarguable conclusion---it's over---it's still interesting, but it's over non the less---this debate may be better suited for a chat session as there is only a very small group of people that are interested. Originally Posted by The Grey Monster

I can't belive you are ok with being Censored !your not interested in this. It not about her for the 3nd time I can't belive you all have a one track mind Lmao


I also have another Question ???

why was this thread censored ????


http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1837089

I am still confuessed
That link is a lot to read, it's to much for me to finish (boring,,,yesterday's news) and I'm the first person to join in on some drama, believe me I love drama,,it's why I'm here,,,but while it's probably much relevant and also very interesting, it's not fun anymore...is there not anyone who's stoleded your donation, or a disease, maybe a ncns, maybe a bad communicator,,crack the seal and it smelled--you guys are very articulate and your post is noted and it certainly sets a precedent on future closures,,, but is there no fun lately--to serious, and I do love me some drama. But I kinda agree with the mods on this one---lock it down.

Some of us are wanting to post about some other crap that's happening but don't want it to be overshadowed by this
Trolling leads to hurt feelings.... Men have feeling too
Cpalmson's Avatar
NOBODY is being censored. I'm not editing, deleting, or censoring threads. I am simply doing my job as a moderator which is to CLOSE threads that go off topic or become flame wars. That is the job of a moderator.
dearhunter's Avatar
I believe you told them to stop talking about a topic.....namely, a whore who went and got herself banned......that is censorship.

Does your directive include no reviews......or just negative threADs?

There is no such guideline.
What's a flame war cpal? Sounds hot
hotrix1's Avatar
NOBODY is being censored. I'm not editing, deleting, or censoring threads. I am simply doing my job as a moderator which is to CLOSE threads that go off topic or become flame wars. That is the job of a moderator. Originally Posted by Cpalmson
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1837928

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1837089

Neither one met the criteria as being off topic, or had any signs of developing into a flame war.

The first being a satirical farewell to an intolerable violator of the Rules you uphold. Much in the same genre as the political cartoons that ridicule our political figures such as the following:

or this.

because as the purpose of SATIRE is described here:From THE COLUMBIA ENCYCLOPEDIA:
From ancient times satirists have shared a common aim: to expose foolishness in all its guises — vanity, hypocrisy, idolatry, bigotry, sentimentality — and to effect reform through such exposure.[quote]

And to disallow it's use is censorship in it's purest form.

And of the latter, where did it go off topic or become a flame war. There was no sign of it becoming either. It was an OP-ED piece written as commentary and none of the responses veered off topic or were remotely inflammatory.
Why then was it closed? To preemptively shut it down in anticipation of disintegration into chaos is rather short-sighted when there is no evidence thereof. It's "Censorship" in the fullest meaning of the word.

Not ganging up on you MODS. Not in the least, but.......
HOW IS THAT NOT CENSORSHIP? Closure is censorship.

"In cases where you would like to request additional clarity about a staff decision, you are free to pursue an answer in either a public forum or private means of communication"
We're asking for clarification about a staff decision on THE BANS & THE DAMNED. Excuse me, I meant to say the Banned
....."If handled publicly, post your inquiry in a respectful manner"
We have not been so much as even come close to being disrespectful, have we?
Jjsunday's Avatar
I believe you told them to stop talking about a topic.....namely, a whore who went and got herself banned......that is censorship.

Does your directive include no reviews......or just negative threADs?

There is no such guideline. Originally Posted by dearhunter

I have showen him where we are being censored and have copyed the guidelines to show him and everyone else

you know about a month ago rrabbit said the MODs have rule too but I think their rules are to NOT Ans any of the Question I ask and just do what they what !

this is really getting OLD!!!