You see the future now

Are you willing to see political correctness enacted into law? Has the First Amendment lost all meaning? Did you notice that when asked about Supreme Court Justices, Hillary did not mention the Constitution? Which freedoms do we no longer need? What more should government be doing for us? Do you forego legal tax deductions in order to increase your tax liability? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

A person has a right to be rude. I don't recommend it, but you can't legislate against it. I think you would find my first amendment believes very robust. Perhaps even more than yours. I think "no law" means "no law". I question even time, place, and manner restrictions. I think that the first amendment protects obscenity. Short of public safety, regulation of fraud, and common law defamation actions, I see very little wiggle room.

A person has a right to be rude. I don't recommend it, but you can't legislate against it. I think you would find my first amendment believes very robust. Perhaps even more than yours. I think "no law" means "no law". I question even time, place, and manner restrictions. I think that the first amendment protects obscenity. Short of public safety, regulation of fraud, and common law defamation actions, I see very little wiggle room. Originally Posted by TexTushHog

Hoggery Clitfaces public opinion is much like yours... Her private opinion is much more Orwellian... What's your private opinion, Hogg Lover?

FTFY, Ekim .


Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I went back and checked my sources; yes, it was Bentham who created the Panopticon and it was Foucalt who I had commenting on it. Of course, most people here didn't even bother to look it up or could understand what Foucalt was trying to warn us against. Nice to know that some people did.

i posted the guardian link on bentham, but didn't make clear he was the originator of the panopticon concept.

interestingly, he was the one who came up with a system of accountability with the question & answer session the british parliament was famous for.

bentham has weird request that after he died he wanted to be mummfied and put on display. they claim to have done this, but i've my doubts. looks like they stuck in a wax figure of him in a climate controlled glass case.

A person has a right to be rude. I don't recommend it, but you can't legislate against it. I think you would find my first amendment believes very robust. Perhaps even more than yours. I think "no law" means "no law". I question even time, place, and manner restrictions. I think that the first amendment protects obscenity. Short of public safety, regulation of fraud, and common law defamation actions, I see very little wiggle room. Originally Posted by TexTushHog

Hillary doesn't. And neither will her SCOTUS appointees. The First Amendment will be dead in two years.

i posted the guardian link on bentham, but didn't make clear he was the originator of the panopticon concept.

interestingly, he was the one who came up with a system of accountability with the question & answer session the british parliament was famous for.

bentham has weird request that after he died he wanted to be mummfied and put on display. they claim to have done this, but i've my doubts. looks like they stuck in a wax figure of him in a climate controlled glass case. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

No, that's him.

Hillary doesn't. And neither will her SCOTUS appointees. The First Amendment will be dead in two years. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I think Hillary will be dead in two years and she'll be carried around by Bill and Chelsea.

is this anything like wikileaks recent email release wherein hellary wants an "unaware and compliant citizenry"?

Yes, she is also noted that she likes Putin's leadership style....early Iron Curtain.