Who Got Caught as a John or Hocktard?

Don't flatter yourself. I respond to a lot of people who are off the mark in their posts in which they "play to the audience" in an effort to appear to those who DON'T KNOW that YOU "DO KNOW"!

As is OBVIOUS you CHANGED YOUR POSITION AFTER I POSTED!!!!

That's not "stalking" ... again you distort the FACTS!

If you want to be the Mother Hen of the Eccie Chicklets then you might start them off in their new life with some loyalty to TRUTH rather than some misguided loyalty to YOU. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Don't flatter yourself and distort any facts. No, I was tapping away in reply to Grace AS you were posting. Your comment didn't alter anything about my response. I live out in the boonies and have a slow Internet connection to begin with (something I've stated many times on ECCIE), and editing takes a wee bit when I'm still half asleep. (Oh, the typos before caffeine.)

I don't want to be anybody's mother and have said so repeatedly. My opinions are mine alone, right or wrong, to be regarded by roosters, hens, chicks, foxes, and wolves as they see fit, easily ignored, so any "power" and "position" you are attributing to me to affect how others think is mythical. People need only be loyal to their own convictions.

I do not wish to argue with you first thing in the morning. Fine, you're right about life, the universe, and everything, I'm completely wrong all of the time, truce, tea and crumpets, go our merry way and have a lovely day.

Don't flatter yourself and distort any facts.
Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

I don't! You do! So what's my "agenda" about which you elude?

(Speaking of "thinking" for someone else!)

And that is not an INVITATION for you to spread RW information or misinformation about me either, as you were accused of doing in the past with regard to someone else!

All I have to say to the Little Eccie Chicklets (or want-a-be's) is an old saying that applies to you ...

"A dog that will bring a bone will carry a bone!"

I'm not "arguing" I'm responding to your holier than though, dismissive attitude, as you struggle to be relevant "to the crowd"! If that increases your income, have at it!

This place is a "hobby" (past-time) for me, not a source of income like it is for you!

Truce, LL, tea and crumpets. As stated, I am not up to arguing anymore or debating personal foibles. Too much public drama makes all of ECCIE look bad. I don't care about anyone's past, present, or future agenda, just supporting the Irish Chihuahua Refuge. Please leave me be, and I'll do the same.

Getting back to the topic at hand, I missed all of the news reports last night. Did any relevant info come to light that we should beware of, or was Houston Vice just slapping themselves on the shoulders for their Super Bowl morality enforcement efforts?

A related question: WHY is it okay for media to publish mug shots for those arrested but not yet prosecuted? I understand that is serves as motivation for others not to offend, but is it in keeping with the "innocent until proven guilty" stance of the judicial system? Careers can be ruined off this practice even if defendants are found blameless.

WHY is it okay for media to publish mug shots for those arrested but not yet prosecuted? I understand that is serves as motivation for others not to offend, but is it in keeping with the "innocent until proven guilty" stance of the judicial system?
[/COLOR] Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

Why do you look up their RW arrest information?

Why do you look up their RW arrest information? Originally Posted by LexusLover

I was looking at various reports online about prostitution operations and penalties in general in regard to this topic. Noticed that some media outlets publish real world info, names, ages, charges, bond amounts, straight up in mug shot captions primly placed, which induced my "innocent until proven guilty" question. I'd link for example, but as WU pointed out, that might get me banned if anyone arrested is coincidentally a member here. A Google search of local news station stories will show you what I mean, especially one that starts off the alphabet.

(And as an aside, I have no wish to be relevant, so struggle not with any "crowd." This is also a "hobby" for me as well, not my sole source of income for some time now. I do occasionally, for my own mental health, have to dismiss individuals who repetitively bring me down, unless they ARE paying. Best wishes for a wanton Wednesday, LL. As a matter of fact, I will be down in town playing doggy with a boner!)

Okay, total thread hijack... I and a number of other members are having problems logging in. I started a thread in the Question for Staff section here: http://eccie.net/showthread.php?p=10...post1059163955

Anybody else having problems? Please comment there. The issue seems to be escalating.

Unfortunately, Fancy-- by the very nature of our profession, we are considered "flight risks" unless we have ties to the community that we are arrested in. Some municipalities are way worse about this than others. I guarantee you if you fill a room with ladies in the hobby and I throw a rock-- odds are good I can hit someone with a warrant for "failure to appear". It really isn't that unusual. Particularly for the set with no permanent address.

Unfortunately, Fancy-- by the very nature of our profession, we are considered "flight risks" unless we have ties to the community that we are arrested in. Some municipalities are way worse about this than others. I guarantee you if you fill a room with ladies in the hobby and I throw a rock-- odds are good I can hit someone with a warrant for "failure to appear". It really isn't that unusual. Particularly for the set with no permanent address. Originally Posted by GracePreston

Good point. The ladies working and living out of no-tells are probably the most likely to be popped for popping 4 pay. The carefree vagabond life is attractive, but has definite disadvantages.

Wonder which state is the most Hobby-friendly OTHER than brothelized Nevada? Their tolerance varies by county, too.

Although arrests are common in Chicago-- I know that a first offender gets in and out pretty easily, regardless of where they are from.

I also know that Kentucky is pretty lax in terms of the penalties-- they'll arrest you quick, but the max fine if convicted is $250. There is also no escallation for multiple offenses. It is also somewhat difficult to get a conviction in Kentucky if you lawyer up.

Even cities in the same state can be different. Dallas tends to be a bit easier than Houston in terms of bonding out, etc.

Back on topic tho, someone in this here thread ^^^^^ said they got busted.... dont care who, dont care why.

Just glad it twasn't me.


(On a side note, here is an Oldie but a goodie .....)

http://m.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=556186

Ditto! Been holed up at the Irish Chihuahua Refuge when I wasn't visting longtime lusters in neighboring locales. Haven't been in Houston proper much lately due to all of the attention on Hobby hussying. -- Fancy, from her phone, where it isn't easy being green

I've been arrested once-- ironically for massage without a license (happened about 4 months before I got my license).

That's a Class C in Texas... but unlike most Class C's, you cannot get deferred adjudication nor can you get it expunged.. so I fought it. Seems it wasn't worth it to the court to spend the money on a jury trial for something with a maximum fine of $200. Was eventually dropped. If more ladies would fight....

I do travel heavily as my home region is absolute shit. Part of being a responsible traveling whore is knowing what you're walking into-- so I research the fuck out of everywhere I travel to. Even the most careful screeners can falter-- I'd rather be proactive and be able to get my ass out of a situation quickly. Knowledge is power.

That's a Class C in Texas... but unlike most Class C's, you cannot get deferred adjudication nor can you get it expunged.. .. Originally Posted by GracePreston

I don't know where you get that information, ...

.... but that is legally (and factually) incorrect.

I've had my "ear to ground" with respect to some providers for a long time and my only comment is as a group of consumers of legal services they are getting screwed to the wall by a pack of "legal eagles" who are gouging the group with bullshit tales to assure higher fees. A problem is the group believes they have to remain "tight" in the inner circle to maintain their anonymity, which contributes to the monopoly created by the misinformation from those preying on the "consumers" of their services. And before anyone tries to interpret what I'm thinking: That's no ad, it's just honesty!

Little known fact that 'The Man' doesn't want us to know.

There is a huge disparity of percentage of arrests of AA fuckers v.s. NBA fuckers. ijs

Black Fuckers Lives Matter !!!!!!!!!

Won't see that on the news.

Cheers

not me! haha. the curious side makes me wonder what honey pot they could have construed to catch 250+ ! if ABC is to be believed. out of 250 or more my thought was odds are good a member here could have gotten caught up in that shit storm. hopefully not though.

ABC 13 is hyping a big story on prostitution stings and arrests tonight at 10 p.m........................... ...........
Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

beat me to it as usual. this was the one I caught being flaunted around. thought for sure it would be mostly out of towners or something but from skimming the thread doesn't sound like it.

Don't flatter yourself. I respond to a lot of people who are off the mark in their posts in which they "play to the audience" in an effort to appear to those who DON'T KNOW that YOU "DO KNOW"!........................ .................. Originally Posted by LexusLover

pffft. pot, meet kettle

only one maybe two that meet this accusation.

who else here claims to know everything? hell, I still learn stuff here. of course thinking deviously is not natural for some of us.

i got caught..HAPPY ??? fucking maroon Originally Posted by Heman

don't believe it for some reason. if true that sucks some donkey balls I'd imagine. hoping just sarcasm.