You have admitted that you never had a satisfactory experience with a lady, yes? I think that either your expectations are too high or you are seeing the wrong ladies for you. In other words, I think you would have been disappointed no matter what she did regarding the rates. Originally Posted by China DollSo that justifies jumping the rate $100? There is no ad I've seen that guarantees satisfaction or your money back.
So that justifies jumping the rate $100? There is no ad I've seen that guarantees satisfaction or your money back.Charles,
What I have said in the past is that I've been disappointed in about 80% of meetings. Are some meetings better than others? Yes. Are some worse? Yes. But for the most part, I've been disappointed.
I've seen a couple of ladies who, if I had the opportunity, I would see again.
But no matter how bad the experience, I've never panned any lady on a review. Maybe I should have, but I didn't. I don't do reviews any more. Originally Posted by charlestudor2005
Charles,Let's not go overboard, Joshua. Given that there is a very specific quid pro quo involved, simply meeting "the unknown" client doesn't alone command the high level of respect you wish to bestow upon them. It takes more than that, and frankly, those who truly deserve it deserve to stand out from those who don't.
"no matter how bad the experience" (not that I've had any really bad experiences), I would never "pan" a woman, either. Maybe you should have? - NO , in my opinion. These lovely women, as long as they are not disrespecting or cheating/stealing from their clients, demand a high level of respect - for their courage at least, to meet with "the unknown" - guys like us!
So no - you shouldn't have, and don't.Originally Posted by Joshua
Let's not go overboard, Joshua. Given that there is a very specific quid pro quo involved, simply meeting "the unknown" client doesn't alone command the high level of respect you wish to bestow upon them. It takes more than that, and frankly, those who truly deserve it deserve to stand out from those who don't. Originally Posted by DooveGood point, Doove. I guess what I was trying to say is, that I have a great deal of respect for our providers just from the inherent risk they take in seeing us for the first time. So I would never "pan" them if things didn't go as well as I might have hoped or expected. Now, if there was something really uncomfortable, or objectionable that happened on our first meeting, I would mention it in a review as a "room for improvement" issue. But you are right, those that truly deserve that higher level of respect, due to the way they shine above many others, definitely should get that more positive feedback. I come from the school - "If you can't say something nice, then...."