how is assup a zionist? Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
Because he's for anything that will bring this country to it's knees, where he obviously spends most of his time.Ignorant motherfucker. Just totally ignorant. You don't even know what that word means, you ignorant motherfucker.
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
Ok...you stupid fuckers are saying that taking out Gaddafi was bad. Yet say nothing about what precipitated that....Bush taking out Saddam. Which was only about a 100 times worse blunder.Don't call other people idiots when you don't know what you're even talking about. For starters this is the New World Order, you're already in it. It's a gradual indoctrination of a culture to think and feel in a certain way brought to the people of this country by an insane government. It's a global scheme and they have succeeded. As this sick twisted idea of a NWO progresses further, economies will crash, wars will be initiated, new diseases will pop up, natural disasters will be exploited as a result of "Global Warming" and mankind's environmental negligence, ect. The Government will sell their ideas as solutions when in fact they are not. So it's not just Trump and Putin they are just players on todays stage.
Why is that? Is it because you silly fuckers supported the invasion of Iraq?
So I find it strange how some of you idiots are so ignorant of your hypocrisy. LexyLiar being the biggest.
Now you're supporting Putin and Trump. The New World Order, Leaders!
. Originally Posted by WTF
Khaddafi paid all the fines related to the Pan Am bombing and was, as far as I knew, living up to all the US agreements. He was a bad man though. Dunno why Obama decided to take him out. Originally Posted by gnadflyObama was not the one who decided to take him out. It was the European leaders who did. Obama complied with their wishes. He was literally leading from behind on this. This about where Clinton gets involves in this.
Ignorant motherfucker. Just totally ignorant. You don't even know what that word means, you ignorant motherfucker.The gig is up and it really pisses you off doesn't? Well that's too dam bad you little parasite.
You are the type of uneducated, stupid motherfucker that ... hey! Were you in the movie "Porky's" Jim?
Holy chit.
The youtube queenie has struck again.I see you are sticking to your Alinsky playbook, WTFlopper!
A Trump/Putin lover and their NWO. Originally Posted by WTF
RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)
RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
My point to Iffy is that Trump is part of the NWO.That's probably the case. The NWO obviously is real. George H. Bush and Henry Kissinger openly spoke of the NWO, it's no longer a secret. One way the NWO will continue to flourish is by keeping the "Right, Left" paradigm intact. One way the NWO really fucks with us is through the entertainment industry and the media. It's already been discovered by whistleblowers and investigative independent journalist that there is truth in movies and lies in the media. It's a twisted concoction of information that is designed to confuse. It's a very successful ploy. Most Americans regard anything we hear and see through the media is the complete truth and movies are just movies with no significant message, and that's not always the case. So they are right up in our face with the NWO.
Folks think Trump is different, he is not. He loves the idea of the rich controlling the masses. Originally Posted by WTF
That's probably the case. The NWO obviously is real. George H. Bush and Henry Kissinger openly spoke of the NWO, it's no longer a secret. One way the NWO will continue to flourish is by keeping the "Right, Left" paradigm intact. One way the NWO really fucks with us is through the entertainment industry and the media. It's already been discovered by whistleblowers and investigative independent journalist that there is truth in movies and lies in the media. It's a twisted concoction of information that is designed to confuse. It's a very successful ploy. Most Americans regard anything we hear and see through the media is the complete truth and movies are just movies with no significant message, and that's not always the case. So they are right up in our face with the NWO.True...
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
Obama was not the one who decided to take him out. It was the European leaders who did. Obama complied with their wishes. He was literally leading from behind on this. This about where Clinton gets involves in this. Originally Posted by dilbert firestormHillary certainly took credit. Hence, it is their legacy. Hillary was Obama's minion.
1-2 years ago I started a thread to speak highly of Obama's accomplishments while in office. Invited everyone to contribute, even the more progressive members of this board. The thread went nowhere and most of the progs remained silent. It wasn't a joke. I believe I started with the decriminalization aspect.I as hoping that by breaking it down into bite size pieces, I'd get the nimrods to respond. I think they ought to be enticed to highlight the positives of Obama's presidency. I was going to proffer something, but couldn't identify anything suitable. I think the progressives may be silent because there isn't anything suitable.
Khaddafi paid all the fines related to the Pan Am bombing and was, as far as I knew, living up to all the US agreements. He was a bad man though. Dunno why Obama decided to take him out. Originally Posted by gnadfly