Democratic debate

hotrix1's Avatar
Better mental health care and access for those who need it. And a way to shoot back against those that decide to take other lives because they're deranged. But that goes against the agenda of the Dummycrats. It'll cost too damn many votes from the uninformed. They'd rather keep the ignorant that way and keep their votes, rather than do something other than take away the guns, high capacity magazines, etc. Now that's insane.

The shooter in the White Settlement, TX church shooting wasn't reloading btw, bc. A good guy with a gun stops him with a well placed shot before he could execute more innocent people. Now that's the kind of gun CONTROL all law abiding citizens should possess. Straight aim and steady nerves. How long did it take the cops to get there? The reports have nothing on that. Because it was over with in 6 seconds.

How many times has a homeowner defend himself with an AR type weapon that doesn't make the news? Plenty. But the media will never report on such news because that doesn't fit their own agenda either. It doesn't sensationalize the crime for the news to sell. People getting killed by the bad guys SELLS.
Better mental health care and access for those who need it. And a way to shoot back against those that decide to take other lives because they're deranged. But that goes against the agenda of the Dummycrats. It'll cost too damn many votes from the uninformed. They'd rather keep the ignorant that way and keep their votes, rather than do something other than take away the guns, high capacity magazines, etc. Now that's insane.

The shooter in the White Settlement, TX church shooting wasn't reloading btw, bc. A good guy with a gun stops him with a well placed shot before he could execute more innocent people. Now that's the kind of gun CONTROL all law abiding citizens should possess. Straight aim and steady nerves. How long did it take the cops to get there? The reports have nothing on that. Because it was over with in 6 seconds.

How many times has a homeowner defend himself with an AR type weapon that doesn't make the news? Plenty. But the media will never report on such news because that doesn't fit their own agenda either. It doesn't sensationalize the crime for the news to sell. People getting killed by the bad guys SELLS. Originally Posted by hotrix1
Ah, a common sense gun owner, your right

But, on the other hand—I did not feel the need to research factually if the gunman had run out of ammo or not, I just like my version better, thanks for ruining that.

Unfortunately common sense laws aren’t always common sense. Once the dems open the door to more “common sense” guns laws, they will continue until they grab them all. Look at Great Britain Originally Posted by ww32566
Absolutely, spot on as the Brits would say, look at Virginia also, testing the waters is what has happened there.

And politics is probably the most posted in category of this forum and other forums as well. It’s all we have left when the girls do t cooperate.
hotrix1's Avatar
How many guns did Obama grab up from the populace?
Hell, I hear he was giving them away. Originally Posted by Precious_b
Leave it to you Precious, to bring up that cursed name, Oblama.

Yeah he was giving them away alright. To the people who can do us harm. Leave it to a Dummycrat/Commie president to sell our Country out to our enemies.

And people think they want to try another socialist again? Fucking insane.

And here's an example of Dummycrats' hypocrisy: https://www.ammoland.com/2020/02/vir...#axzz6FDPtEP84
Should have them hanged for treason.
What? You don't like free college? They think their tuition & fees (loans & debt) are high. Wait until they graduate and get the bill for everyone who goes to college after them. (Here's a secret - your own debt is a finite number. Paying tuition for everyone who comes after you never ends.)
Biden won the primaries, which was expected I guess, and Bernie did good. Neither of them had a chance of beating Trump, I think Bloomberg had the only chance, he knows how to get under Trumps skin and is more successful in the business world, and was much more suave in his limited debates of the other candidates. I guess he’s a looser in politics thinking all that money he invested in advertising would work.

Schiff and Pelosi won in landslides in their districts. I don’t get that anymore then I get Schumer being taken serious.