Clesing Review Treads....

If he had time to bump the review he had time to put a post in COED and cross reference the review. A runner was better posted as a review or a separate COED post instead of dreading up an old review. Dr was right to close it and leave the additional info up. There was no reason to continuously discuss what was added by the bump. Originally Posted by CryptKicker

Looking for an example of this:


Some exceptions may apply if you are providing relevant, valuable or updated information about the provider,

It sure seemed like this was the case in the "bump".
If it didn't qualify... what eacxtly would??

And if NOTHING qualifies... why not remove that part of the guideline so there is no question about it....

Lot's of WOS going on here....

I know this is over 30 days, however just wanted to add that she pulled a runner on me.

What could be more relevant than a girl changing from provider to thief??