So, TTH, you did make a generalization without specific facts, just like you did when you accused me of hiring discrimination without any factual basis to make such a claim. You have no idea what jobs he brought to Texas. Some certainly could be those type yet you poo-poo'd the entire job creation in the article as irrelevant.
Originally Posted by Boltfan
You don't listen well, do you? I'm currently representing three home health care aids who hurt themselves. None of the companies have workers' comp. I'm suing the employer. All three are making minimum wage (or within a dollar of it). That's not a generalization. That's my personal experience.
Then, when you raised the issue, I mentioned that personal experience. Finally, to confirm what I had observed personally, I found BLS statistics that showed national averages very consistent with what I wrote.
As for the executive quoted, at least according to the article, his business is home health care. One assumes that in that business, they hire home health care aides. What the fuck else would they do? Hire astronauts for NASA?
What part of that sounds like something that is "without any factual basis"?
But lets just look at the record. Texas leads the country in percentage of minimum wage jobs.
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/201...mum-wage-jobs/
Massachusetts created more jobs in terms of percentages, however. And they were better jobs.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...-rankings.html
Furthermore, despite Perry's anti-government rhetoric, the reason that jobs have been created during the down turn, is not because of private industry hiring, but because government was hiring.
And of course the reason government was hiring was because Perry, despite his supposed ideological opposition, had his snoot deep in the Federal stimulus trough to make himself look better for a run at the Presidency.
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/...deficit/70077/