“Nobody should trust Wikipedia”!

They taught us in 3rd grade not to trust Wikipedia or dot com websites, and I'm a fucking idiot.

I don't know if many on this forum rode the short bus to school, but no one else was taught this?

I'm literally a retard.

So, if there are people more dumb than me then I'm afraid there's no hope.

They taught us in 3rd grade not to trust Wikipedia or dot com websites, and I'm a fucking idiot.

I don't know if many on this forum rode the short bus to school, but no one else was taught this?

I'm literally a retard.

So, if there are people more dumb than me then I'm afraid there's no hope. Originally Posted by Strokey_McDingDong

Wha'Chu talkin' 'bout, McStrokey? YR's AMP reviews are gospel.

Wha'Chu talkin' 'bout, McStrokey? YR's AMP reviews are gospel. Originally Posted by gnadfly

i hear he's working on a Netflix deal under the Obama label called "My struggle with thongs"



BAHHAHAAAAA

i hear he's working on a Netflix deal under the Obama label called "My struggle with thongs"

BAHHAHAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

thongs or tongs

thongs or tongs Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

are u saying he chases girls around using tongs to remove their thongs?



BAHHAHHAAAAA

are u saying he chases girls around using tongs to remove their thongs?

BAHHAHHAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

well, he can be pretty crabby with those tongs on thongs.

what yall oinking bout?

snick

and yet you'll believe anything negative about Trump without any verifiable source, all hiding under the "anonymous" label. is there one single "anonymous" story about Trump you don't believe?


i bet not Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

The source is generally right out of Trump's mouth or his stupid sons.

Dude your fucking blind, or willfully ignorant. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Ignorance is bliss, especially anything regarding a loser like Trump.

The source is generally right out of Trump's mouth or his stupid sons. Originally Posted by royamcr

No.

I don't go to W-P for news , current events or recent history for just those reasons pousted in the OP.

However, it s good starting place for non-woke affected subjects such as the history of optial design (a passing intertest of mine) or objective discussion of climate swings during the BHroze Age or medevile history. Intro to hard sciences

Wikipedia is an indirect or secondary source at best.
It doesn't make any sense to use Wikipedia as a direct source for any information.

One should be looking at the sources, if there are any, that Wikipedia is getting their information from. If there aren't any citations, then it's not trustworthy. If the citations are themselves indirect or secondary, then it's not trustworthy. If the citations are direct but from a dot com or otherwise bullshit source, then it's not trustworthy.

Again, we were taught this in 3rd grade at some retarded rural school wtf.

So, when you check their web page on Ivermectin and see that the source of the information they are posting is from a Politico fact check dot com website and not a scientific document, then you LOL.

J and TWK - post 14 and 15 - well written

Addressing the incurable TDS and hatred.

such a shame that sheeples live life under the thrall of fascist Goebbels DPST propaganda.