SCOTUS Nominee.

... Then the Republicans should vote NO on her.

### Salty

... Then the Republicans should vote NO on her.

### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

I suspect many will but you always have several spineless RINOs that bend over and take it

Have they dug through her high school yearbook yet?

Have they dug through her high school yearbook yet? Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Yeah - can't wait for the questions if she got drunk - or what BOOF written in her yearbook means

“The left has become so extreme that we now have a justice being nominated to the Supreme Court who testified under oath that she cannot say what a woman is. If she can’t even say what a WOMAN is, how on earth can she be trusted to say what the CONSTITUTION is?” - President Trump

White House omitted light Jackson *Prohibited topic* sentence in document given to senators, GOP says: 'Cover-up'

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ket...tence-cover-up

My question would be: If you can't give a definition of "woman", then how can you pass a bill or law to protect "women"?

My question would be: If you can't give a definition of "woman", then how can you pass a bill or law to protect "women"? Originally Posted by DrivesAllDay

BINGO!




WINNER WINNER, CHICKEN DINNER!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Zackly right, you can't ban a dude from playing on a girls team, if there is no definition of what a man or a woman is.

Anarchy, that's what the Dems want, if you have no rules, no laws can exist.

BINGO!


WINNER WINNER, CHICKEN DINNER!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Zackly right, you can't ban a dude from playing on a girls team, if there is no definition of what a man or a woman is.

Anarchy, that's what the Dems want, if you have no rules, no laws can exist. Originally Posted by Devo

But notice? She said "I'm not a biologist", which would mean its biological, not physical (penis/vagina) or mental (psychological). Therefore, to be a woman you should have the DNA/Chromosomes of a woman. XX not XY. No matter how much hormone therapy you have, your DNA does not lie.


And what I was also getting at is, if there is no definition of "woman", then why do we need abortion rights? We can toss out sexual assault laws that favor this imaginary creature called "woman". Womens Rights? No such thing as "woman". Those laws can now be ignored!!

... Mate, what a GREAT point you make.

... Violence against women... Equal pay... Miss America....

Womens rest rooms... Ladies Night at the Pub... Hiring Quotas.

ALL GONE!

... I'm rather sure we can think of a lot more.

### Salty

Tulsi Gabbard: In order to have a Supreme Court committed to protecting the rights of all Americans, including women, every justice needs to understand there is such a thing as a woman, as distinct from a man. Yet when asked to define the word “woman,” Supreme Court nominee. Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson said, “I don’t know.” The hypocrisy and absurdity of this is that she was nominated by President Biden in large part because she is a woman.

Any male owned small business not immediately re-certifying as “woman owned” with the SBA right now is missing out on contracts and set asides.

And if anyone on the Left gives you grief about it, ask them exactly why you don’t qualify.

Any male owned small business not immediately re-certifying as “woman owned” with the SBA right now is missing out on contracts and set asides.

And if anyone on the Left gives you grief about it, ask them exactly why you don’t qualify. Originally Posted by berryberry

I have a friend suffering from late 50s, nobody will hire a white guy syndrome.

I told him to say he was a gay, Native American, with pronouns of chief or chiefs.

I mean, who would really know, it worked for Indian senator Warren.

When the libtards and their media allies are so committed to their ideology that they erase Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas.