There was a review written ..

Ok, here we go with the man bashing. What you said isn't true, maybe that's how you feel but don't act like you speak for us or speak for men in general. Reviews are very handy, they give us some insight on a provider bcd. We all know that ymmv when it comes to see any provider. You think we should schedule an appointment and just hope for the best. In many cases we do, but if we don't have to why should we?
Women come here and act like reviews are a bad thing. It's only a bad thing to a provider who knows something negative will be said about her, in that case she needs to step up her game.
Stop acting like a review is a bad thing. Did you read reviews before you bought that car, before you stayed in that hotel, before you bought that phone, etc? Knock it off. Originally Posted by 405Newguy

And yes I do read reviews before I stay in hotels or buy things. I want to know how other people liked the item or how they used it. Because it's a more reliable opinion than the company is going to give.

And yes I do read reviews before I stay in hotels or buy things. I want to know how other people liked the item or how they used it. Because it's a more reliable opinion than the company is going to give. Originally Posted by KitKatt62

Exactly! That's why we read reviews instead taking a providers word that she's the best ever. (Note: that wasn't directed towards you.)

Exactly! That's why we read reviews instead taking a providers word that she's the best ever. (Note: that wasn't directed towards you.) Originally Posted by 405Newguy

I'm glad you included the note there 😅
But that's my point. A "no" review is just a no review. Like cool no biggie. We can't get along with everyone. But to say blatant lies in the review, that's what my post was about. Was to dispute the lie that he had put in there because I've had others message me about it.

I think it's very easy to say that when you're not the one being reviewed online like a vacuum cleaner. It's dehumanizing and rooted in underlying resentment and bitterness towards women. Unless you're reporting harmful, deceptive business practices such as theft/robbery, violence, blackmail/extortion, scamming/catfishing. Everything else is unnecessary, cause maybe you were an arrogant presumptuous asshole and she couldn't stand you, then nice guys read your bias opinion as if it's coming from a reputable source and not an anonymous screen name.

Personally I think clients should have to state their income when posting a review because that's a big determining factor when it comes to ones personal perception of an experience. A millionaire could have the exact same experience as a low income client for the same price and think it was a great experience, while the low income client is disappointed because his expectations are much higher and more quantitative than qualitative.

Personally I think clients should have to state their income when posting a review because that's a big determining factor when it comes to ones personal perception of an experience. A millionaire could have the exact same experience as a low income client for the same price and think it was a great experience, while the low income client is disappointed because his expectations are much higher and more quantitative than qualitative. Originally Posted by Diamond_xoxo

I get your point, but if we guys are prone to lie on a review anyhow, we are even more likely to lie about income levels.

I get your point, but if we guys are prone to lie on a review anyhow, we are even more likely to lie about income levels. Originally Posted by ImpossibleDreamer

Not sure I agree with you Impossible Dreamer. Given the opportunity, I doubt many guys on here would oversell their income. I thought about this while riding on my private jet to Gstaad and sipping some Chateau Cheval Blanc ‘68

I think it's very easy to say that when you're not the one being reviewed online like a vacuum cleaner. It's dehumanizing and rooted in underlying resentment and bitterness towards women. Unless you're reporting harmful, deceptive business practices such as theft/robbery, violence, blackmail/extortion, scamming/catfishing. Everything else is unnecessary, cause maybe you were an arrogant presumptuous asshole and she couldn't stand you, then nice guys read your bias opinion as if it's coming from a reputable source and not an anonymous screen name. Originally Posted by Diamond_xoxo

I think alot of what you said is wrong. Your acting like women don't have the means or the tools to review, leave comments, or pass notes about guys. I'm not privy to anything that goes on in the "powder room" or the app the women use to leave notes about a guy, I think its logged by the guys phone number or something. The thing is, it goes both ways. I havent seen a single guy bitch and moan about something that was written about him on a platform.
I think Kat said it best, if a guy leaves a bad review, cool. They just didn't get along. Move on.
There's women that won't see me anymore and I know they've left negative comments about me, yet there are women who have seen me multiple times and have no problem seeing me again. I dont complain about the ones who won't see me again and spoke bad about me. We simply didn't click, im sorry, life goes on.

Personally I think clients should have to state their income when posting a review because that's a big determining factor when it comes to ones personal perception of an experience. A millionaire could have the exact same experience as a low income client for the same price and think it was a great experience, while the low income client is disappointed because his expectations are much higher and more quantitative than qualitative. Originally Posted by Diamond_xoxo

I understand what your saying, but I think if you flip that scenario around it would be more accurate. Also I don't think income has anything to do with it. You can be 150 a hhr on STG or 300 a hhr on tryst. That doesn't mean just because you have a higher rate that you'll be better. Yes, im using rates like you use income, because that's income also.

I get your point, but if we guys are prone to lie on a review anyhow, we are even more likely to lie about income levels. Originally Posted by ImpossibleDreamer

Again, my opinion. I dont think guys are prone to lie. If your talking about "lying by omission", I see your point. Maybe he didn't include her teeth were bad, maybe he said he suited up but actually didn't. I do understand that. As far as saying someone was great when they weren't or saying someone was terrible because she made him suit up. I think those situations are few and far between. Or maybe I'm naive

Not sure I agree with you Impossible Dreamer. Given the opportunity, I doubt many guys on here would oversell their income. I thought about this while riding on my private jet to Gstaad and sipping some Chateau Cheval Blanc ‘68 Originally Posted by Bames Jond

Haha.

But to expand, some may lie high to impress, and others may lie low to try to get better rates "Gee Sweetheart, I know you are work $XXX, but I only have $YYY on my income, but I want to be a consistent regular at $YYY, but will only be able to see you once a month at $XXX, but at $YYY and three times a month is more than one time at $XXX yadda yadda yadda."

Again, my opinion. I dont think guys are prone to lie. If your talking about "lying by omission", I see your point. Maybe he didn't include her teeth were bad, maybe he said he suited up but actually didn't. I do understand that. As far as saying someone was great when they weren't or saying someone was terrible because she made him suit up. I think those situations are few and far between. Or maybe I'm naive Originally Posted by 405Newguy

I agree, I do not think most of us are prone to lie. I was just pointing out that stating income level in the review is likely to not be a way to weed out the lying liars who are the subject of this thread, because if they are willing to embellish lies to make a lady look bad unfairly in a review, they are likely to not have any qualms about lying about their reported income level to what is considered 'trustworthy' status if it is not already in that range anyway. And I am not certain why one income level is necessarily more trustworthy than others. Dipshits of all income levels exist.