Panama Canal

Never said he owned it. Possessive grammar touches on ownership or association.

His company having a management deal and his licensing deal are sufficient for association.

Trump's hotel vs Panama's Panama Canal.

Feel free to show your work on connecting the dots to prove he isn't being an angsty bitch seeking revenge on this.

Never said he owned it. Possessive grammar touches on ownership or association.

His company having a management deal and his licensing deal are sufficient for association.

Trump's hotel vs Panama's Panama Canal.

Feel free to show your work on connecting the dots to prove he isn't being an angsty bitch seeking revenge on this. Originally Posted by HDGristle

no. i'll wait for you.

i mean .. you can prove a small hotel mgmt deal which is nothing to Trump financially is why he wants the Panama canal back, right?

it's China.


there's the dots. all in a straight line.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/canal-thr...143402424.html

Some breadcrumbs, if you choose to accept them. Feel free to digest and dissect.

Draw common sense conclusions. Share your work

... Ain't no dots to connect. ... Waco is correct! ...

And so is Trump on the issue. ... Winning! ...

#### Salty

https://www.yahoo.com/news/canal-thr...143402424.html

Some breadcrumbs, if you choose to accept them. Feel free to digest and dissect.

Draw common sense conclusions. Share your work Originally Posted by HDGristle

your source is as stale as your breadcrumbs.


you really think anyone will take the independent's far left nonsense seriously?

When you can't address the argument, attack the source. Vintage TWK

When you can't address the argument, attack the source. Vintage TWK Originally Posted by HDGristle

the argument is leftist bs .. like the source.



try harder

I got what I wanted on page 1

The real issue behind Panama
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/don...nce-rcna190353


I've heard on TV that Panama agreed with Rubio to limit China's power over the canel

They already were bound to limit their power.

Panama won't be renewing a separate infrastructure deal which has allowed counties to owe China large amounts of debt that then tangentially gives them influence.

It wasn't a Panama Canal deal, it addressed other infrastructure including two ports near the canal that some felt uneasy about.

A far cry from what Trump has been saying in the media.

In reality, we know he's still whinging over that hotel deal that made him and his company look bad during his 1st term.

Never underestimate the ability of adults to cover for impulsive bloviation of dear orange leader with somewhat reasoned arguments.

They already were bound to limit their power.

Panama won't be renewing a separate infrastructure deal which has allowed counties to owe China large amounts of debt that then tangentially gives them influence.

It wasn't a Panama Canal deal, it addressed other infrastructure including two ports near the canal that some felt uneasy about.

A far cry from what Trump has been saying in the media.

In reality, we know he's still whinging over that hotel deal that made him and his company look bad during his 1st term.

Never underestimate the ability of adults to cover for impulsive bloviation of dear orange leader with somewhat reasoned arguments. Originally Posted by HDGristle

You have it backwards, you bloviated nonsense by Democrats that support China over the United States in too many policies

no. i'll wait for you.

i mean .. you can prove a small hotel mgmt deal which is nothing to Trump financially is why he wants the Panama canal back, right?

it's China.


there's the dots. all in a straight line. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Trump capital didn’t go towards building the development itself, but the tower used the Trump name for branding, and companies controlled by the Trump Organization would manage the property, which contained a casino, hotel rooms and condos.

Financially has little to do Trump's egomania. Trump is all about egomania. His name was on the hotel...

OTOH, I'm not sure how much the hotel fiasco has to do with Trump's wanting to 'take back' the Panama Canal.

Panama does have a 'deal' with China through the Belt and Road Initiative...which they have offered to drop.

You have it backwards, you bloviated nonsense by Democrats that support China over the United States in too many policies Originally Posted by farmstud60

Share... in detail. I'm game.

Sorry, Waco. WD won the internet today. Originally Posted by HDGristle

I concur. Extemely rare when someone can claim that.

I’ll go with Waco. Originally Posted by Jacky S

And we have another agreeing.

When you can't address the argument, attack the source. Vintage TWK Originally Posted by HDGristle

That's his fall back when he has no fact to stand on.

Heres to Winnie Winning the Internet!