Encounter: Great Time with Classic MILF - Nora

George, while I'm glad you had a great time there is no need to get your panties in bunch. Nobody called you out specifically, or called you a loser, idiot, or dick like you chose to do.

How come were not allowed to question, chat, challenge or discuss things respectfully? This is a forum. You can check what the definition of that is, if needed.


Fake reviews are a real thing. we've all seen them . They exist and at least 4 of us thought the wave of reviews was an anomaly. Maybe we were wrong.


Her age is an issue for a lot and they have mentioned it. Even glowing reviews mention how good she looks with the qualifier "for her age" or for "60+." etc. She is geriatric or close to it and she is close to retirement age. Those are just facts, not mean, they are just true statements. If that's for you, cool. If not, also cool.


None of us are trying to "crucify her" (a bit dramatic of a statement right?) Lobodick said they have met and shes great. Dweezle said she is great but too old for his taste. I said I'm sure shes real and a fine time if you're into women her age. Seems like a far cry from crucifixion.


Chill bro, and don't take what strangers on the internet say so personal.

George, while I'm glad you had a great time there is no need to get your panties in bunch. Nobody called you out specifically, or called you a loser, idiot, or dick like you chose to do.

How come were not allowed to question, chat, challenge or discuss things respectfully? This is a forum. You can check what the definition of that is, if needed.


Fake reviews are a real thing. we've all seen them . They exist and at least 4 of us thought the wave of reviews was an anomaly. Maybe we were wrong.


Her age is an issue for a lot and they have mentioned it. Even glowing reviews mention how good she looks with the qualifier "for her age" or for "60+." etc. She is geriatric or close to it and she is close to retirement age. Those are just facts, not mean, they are just true statements. If that's for you, cool. If not, also cool.


None of us are trying to "crucify her" (a bit dramatic of a statement right?) Lobodick said they have met and shes great. Dweezle said she is great but too old for his taste. I said I'm sure shes real and a fine time if you're into women her age. Seems like a far cry from crucifixion.


Chill bro, and don't take what strangers on the internet say so personal. Originally Posted by Capt. America

Sure, we all have particular tastes and I know age is a factor in some people's preferences. I have no problem with that. She isn't everyone's cup of tea.

However, you carefully avoided the main tenent of this thread which is that her reviews are fake. I WAS called out by Lobodick on my review when he said it was "fishy." Maxcar was the first to comment on this thread and implied that Nora herself was the perpetrator. And so on...

By implying that Nora is an old close to retirement lady is somewhat degrading. I've seen 35-year-old Providers that should be retired. Nora still has some good years ahead of her. I believe in honest discourse but the tenor here is somewhat damaging to Nora's reputation and credibility. Especially when out of thin air her reviews aren't credible? If you want to "challenge or discuss things respectfully," then why not do so? Instead, someone cries wolf and non-believers jump on the bandwagon and follow suit. What is the premise of this challenge? Like I said in my previous post, where's the proof that it is all AI?

I see Captain America that you've been around here for over a decade. Too bad you don't have any reviews to share on a review board. Your 19 posts are somewhat anemic as well. What credibility are you bringing to the table?

There is a market for wonderful Providers like Nora. Just as there is a market for 25-year-old hardbodies. Instead of being negative, why not read the review, thank the reviewer and move on. If she isn't your type, so be it. We don't have to delve into mudslinging. And you're correct, I am guilty of this. I wrote the first post without taking a deep breath first. Nora reached out to me because she was concerned. I was upset when I read the crap here. But I do apologize for my words. We can all do better and hopefully be respectful to everyone.

Your Family must be very proud. We commend you sir, well done.


"If you check the column for Top Reviewers, you'll see that I am #8 on the list among all ECCIE reviewers with 316. If ECCIE thought for any reason I was fabricating a review, I would suffer some severe consequences with my membership here. The same goes for TER where I posted a review of Nora as well."

For what it is worth, I have seen Nora twice and the ONLY reason it is not more is because I have stopped travelling and am rarely in Albuquerque and I am not alone when I DO get there. Blue Moon Man and I have at separate, times, shared the company of some of the finest ladies (my opinion) that have served ABQ. I know of no one that knows him that thinks ill of him. I have no idea why anyone that has experienced Nora could have anything to say except "more please".

These world class mongers who have been writing these stellar reviews since last century sure do have their panties in a bunch on the slightest criticism of their reviews. Very suspicious... If we figured out some of these reviews are fake and are actually just ads paid for by the women in a marketing package then this site would lose a lot of crediblity wouldn't it???
The truth is Nora is over 60, a geriatric and certainly not anyone's first choice. I can see how she would be paying for positive reviews to increase her marketshare of mongers. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

What a bunch of losers these naysayers are. Though I can't vouch for the other gentlemen who wrote reviews, I don't doubt their veracity.

If you check the column for Top Reviewers, you'll see that I am #8 on the list among all ECCIE reviewers with 316. If ECCIE thought for any reason I was fabricating a review, I would suffer some severe consequences with my membership here. The same goes for TER where I posted a review of Nora as well.

Furthermore, Nora gave me an Okay on P411 who also has stringent requirements and I could lose my valuable membership there as well if I was caught. Why would Nora give me an Okay if I didn't see her? She has the same standards to adhere to. Plain Joe is also a member of P411. You think us out of towners randomly pick women across the country to write reviews and request P411 Okays.

If you look at my reviews for June and July for the past 3 years you will see a pattern. I take a cross-country RV trip from Florida to all parts of the country. As my "travel blog" I chronicle my encounters as I try to see someone in every state.

So Maxcar211, Lobodick (apparently appropriately named), TheHolySong & Capt. America, if you have some actual PROOF, we'd all love to see it. Your speculation is a poor reflection on you.

I had one of my best encounters ever with Nora and next year will be doing a FMTY because she is so great. Other than you idiots, who cares if she is over 60. She can outperform many women half her age. She is good looking, in great shape, loves sex and is a wonderful partner.

Instead of throwing around specious arguments, why don't you book a session with her and then use your FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE to either crucify her as you are doing now or say, "Oops, my bad."? Originally Posted by George Spelvin

Buddy I never said the review was fake or suggested it was.

I said the price tag for a old washed up broad is too high as in, someone would be better off getting something younger, tighter and better looking for the asking rate. I have no idea why anyone sane would pay a geriatric anywhere near that price.

It's not degrading to call someone old and it's not degrading to say she's damn near at the US age of retirement. It's flat out factual and you're ass hurt because I called a spade a spade. If someone likes grandma's then more power to them. I'm allowed to say she's way to damn old to even be in the ballpark of a 20 or 30 something yr old.

Buddy I never said the review was fake or suggested it was.

I said the price tag for a old washed up broad is too high as in, someone would be better off getting something younger, tighter and better looking for the asking rate. I have no idea why anyone sane would pay a geriatric anywhere near that price.

It's not degrading to call someone old and it's not degrading to say she's damn near at the US age of retirement. It's flat out factual and you're ass hurt because I called a spade a spade. If someone likes grandma's then more power to them. I'm allowed to say she's way to damn old to even be in the ballpark of a 20 or 30 something yr old. Originally Posted by TheHolySong

Seriously...500 for someone who's at retirement age is wild. For that price you can get a 4 hand at an amp. Or fun with Mila, Jade, Chole, all much younger than Nora.

I get pickings can be slim in abq. But a traveling mongers comes to town and sees Nora? Before any of he ones I listed and a few others?

Make it make sense.

Mecca. Yeah, that was mainly my reason not to see her again. I guess I had a thing for older Swiss women with sexy accents. But her price is way too high, for me, at her point in her career. But I don’t like people on here disparaging women for what they choose to charge. It’s their bodies and their rules. If no one pays, they lower a bit.

Mecca. Yeah, that was mainly my reason not to see her again. I guess I had a thing for older Swiss women with sexy accents. But her price is way too high, for me, at her point in her career. But I don’t like people on here disparaging women for what they choose to charge. It’s their bodies and their rules. If no one pays, they lower a bit. Originally Posted by Dweezle22

Yeah she and others can charge whatever they want. And everybody has there kinks, to each their own.

Mongers mostly set the market. If people are paying 500 dollars for a 60+ year old is not good value imo, unless you have a kink for gilf.

Yeah she and others can charge whatever they want. And everybody has there kinks, to each their own.

Mongers mostly set the market. If people are paying 500 dollars for a 60+ year old is not good value imo, unless you have a kink for gilf. Originally Posted by Mecca

The age of the provider does not make her automatically undesirable or attractive. I have met 20 something with a nubile body with nothing between the ears and 60 something with the skills of a geisha. I think Nora belongs to the latter. Obviously what is attractive is highly personal as preference for green or red chile. For an example, of the providers listed by Mecca, only Jade makes my list.

Buddy I never said the review was fake or suggested it was.

I said the price tag for a old washed up broad is too high as in, someone would be better off getting something younger, tighter and better looking for the asking rate. I have no idea why anyone sane would pay a geriatric anywhere near that price.

It's not degrading to call someone old and it's not degrading to say she's damn near at the US age of retirement. It's flat out factual and you're ass hurt because I called a spade a spade. If someone likes grandma's then more power to them. I'm allowed to say she's way to damn old to even be in the ballpark of a 20 or 30 something yr old. Originally Posted by TheHolySong

I am suggesting these old monger accounts have been adopoted and taken over by the mods of this site and are writing positive reviews for escorts who are willing to pay a little extra for some internal marketing. It is suspicious that the oldest broad on Tryst is getting all the attention. Her photos are of a very old woman covered in thick stage makeup to hide the weathered aged canyons in her face. It doesn't stand to reason and the mods of this site have a lot of explaining to do. It's misrepresentation and fraud.
I'm looking out for the less hostile bros on this site, the ones who get angry about these posts obviously are mental defectives who either have a financial interest in this site or they're mentally unhinged and unwell and need professional therapy or an intervention.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
-Maxcar2110

The age of the provider does not make her automatically undesirable or attractive. I have met 20 something with a nubile body with nothing between the ears and 60 something with the skills of a geisha. I think Nora belongs to the latter. Obviously what is attractive is highly personal as preference for green or red chile. For an example, of the providers listed by Mecca, only Jade makes my list. Originally Posted by desertfish

Why do you care what's between their ears? I only care about the pussy between their legs, their ass and their tits. I'm not paying to have intellectual conversations with these broads. If I want a conversation I'll go to a coffee shop for free and talk up the obese adjunct from the community college at no cost...
I don't get it man...

I am suggesting these old monger accounts have been adopoted and taken over by the mods of this site and are writing positive reviews for escorts who are willing to pay a little extra for some internal marketing. It is suspicious that the oldest broad on Tryst is getting all the attention. Her photos are of a very old woman covered in thick stage makeup to hide the weathered aged canyons in her face. It doesn't stand to reason and the mods of this site have a lot of explaining to do. It's misrepresentation and fraud.
I'm looking out for the less hostile bros on this site, the ones who get angry about these posts obviously are mental defectives who either have a financial interest in this site or they're mentally unhinged and unwell and need professional therapy or an intervention.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
-Maxcar2110 Originally Posted by maxcar2110

Sir you are falsely accusing the ECCIE staff of not following the ECCIE rules with zero proof These accusations are exactly that and could not be more false. 100% of the staff is volunteers and 99% of these members do not post encounters so no favoritism is shown. You are just being a keyboard warrior pushing pure garbage and our members know exactly what’s going on.

The age of the provider does not make her automatically undesirable or attractive. I have met 20 something with a nubile body with nothing between the ears and 60 something with the skills of a geisha. I think Nora belongs to the latter. Obviously what is attractive is highly personal as preference for green or red chile. For an example, of the providers listed by Mecca, only Jade makes my list. Originally Posted by desertfish

I don't think the age itself makes a provider undesirable. I don't book these broads to have conversations with them I book them because they are eye candy and can put out. Everything else is a waste of my time specifically.

I don't understand why people are pretending we aren't in a market where younger and hotter get paid more as a default because they are hotter and younger. The old ones are trying to stay in a game they should of been out of by now. Nora probably is a sweet woman and probably can put on a show but her getting over 3 bones is absolutely madness.

The funny thing is men do this a lot. They baby sit and handle women with kid gloves and defend madness. If you and anyone one of us was broke but very good looking there wouldn't be any service. We would be judged based off our coin and not being an ass. They don't care if we got the best dick they've had all week if we don't have coin they will judge us.

For some reason we can't judge them for being sloppy, old, overweight etc. I've never in my life seen people actually say a 60 something year old can charge more than the average state 25 yr old. This state is probably the weirdest place I've ever been.

In my eyes it's factual older broads lose value and asking power as they age and their body isn't as hot looking. The same way we lose value as customers when our coins are short or expended.