My pleasure to announce the death of another left-wing-nut narrative

Depends on the round used, a shot like that can go right through the body, and you aren't hitting multiple organs. It would hurt and do damage but not instant death unless you hit the heart or artery. And like mentioned no way of shooter to know if he was protected by a vest. Originally Posted by royamcr

Kirk was not wearing a vest. it's clear he had a tshirt on. he had no reason to expect what happened

Absolutely. 200 yds to the chest with a 30/06 his organs would explode and it’s the easiest shot. If he had any type of training, even hunting, he’d have gone center mass. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

it's the standard kill shot for a sniper. it's also the basic shot for infantrymen too for a reason. it works.

... Agreed about the vest there, and it didn't seem
like the aim was centre-mass... Which is why I also
believe this was a head shot that just missed.

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

more proof it was not a pro shooter just some angry pro trans dickhead

He absolutely could have worn low profile armor under that shirt.

Kirk was not wearing a vest. it's clear he had a tshirt on. he had no reason to expect what happened






it's the standard kill shot for a sniper. it's also the basic shot for infantrymen too for a reason. it works.





more proof it was not a pro shooter just some angry pro trans dickhead Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

This is material for the political forum ?

^^^^
Anything you want to add to the thread topic or do you just want to complain?

He absolutely could have worn low profile armor under that shirt. Originally Posted by royamcr

the video disproves it. you want to believe what didn't happen. for obvious reasons

This is material for the political forum ? Originally Posted by VitaMan

yes

^^^^
Anything you want to add to the thread topic or do you just want to complain? Originally Posted by golferguy55

no and yes


bahahaha

You are so cute. Must be butt hurt

This thread is a better fit for a gun magazine

You haven't seen this video? It shows a rounded corner object under his shirt. When hit you can see the plate bounce and stretch the logo on the shirt.

The theory is the bullet hit his top left corner of the plate and bounced up and tore a hole in his neck and vessel.

If it was a true neck shot there would be an exit wound on the back side.

https://pollywebart.com/watch-slow-m...rTvfDf5WXo15yA

the video disproves it. you want to believe what didn't happen. for obvious reasons






yes





no and yes


bahahaha Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Kirk was not wearing a vest. it's clear he had a tshirt on. he had no reason to expect what happened






it's the standard kill shot for a sniper. it's also the basic shot for infantrymen too for a reason. it works.





more proof it was not a pro shooter just some angry pro trans dickhead Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Evidence

• Evidence refers to facts, signs, or objects that support a belief or proposition.
• It is often used in legal contexts to indicate information that points to guilt or innocence.
• Examples include witness testimonies, documents, and physical objects.

Proof

• Proof is the conclusion or result derived from evidence.
• It establishes certainty about a fact beyond a reasonable doubt.
• In legal terms, proof is what convinces a judge or jury of a fact's truth.

So, it would also be proof that the dumpster's poor little ear stunt was a staged operation by Retardlicans, right? He missed from half the distance.

Ridiculous comment as the shooter was killed. Usually shooters don't get killed in poor little stunts

You are so cute. Must be butt hurt

This thread is a better fit for a gun magazine Originally Posted by VitaMan

if you say so

Ridiculous comment as the shooter was killed. Usually shooters don't get killed in poor little stunts Originally Posted by VitaMan

exactly.

You haven't seen this video? It shows a rounded corner object under his shirt. When hit you can see the plate bounce and stretch the logo on the shirt.

The theory is the bullet hit his top left corner of the plate and bounced up and tore a hole in his neck and vessel.

If it was a true neck shot there would be an exit wound on the back side.

https://pollywebart.com/watch-slow-m...rTvfDf5WXo15yA Originally Posted by royamcr

why everyone has heard of pollywebart! why they are so famous they don't have a bias rating ... at all. bahahaa


let's see what the FBI and Utah police say about Kirk wearing a vest or not and the medical examiner's report.



and what difference at this point does it make?

Evidence

• Evidence refers to facts, signs, or objects that support a belief or proposition.
• It is often used in legal contexts to indicate information that points to guilt or innocence.
• Examples include witness testimonies, documents, and physical objects.

Proof

• Proof is the conclusion or result derived from evidence.
• It establishes certainty about a fact beyond a reasonable doubt.
• In legal terms, proof is what convinces a judge or jury of a fact's truth.

So, it would also be proof that the dumpster's poor little ear stunt was a staged operation by Retardlicans, right? He missed from half the distance. Originally Posted by 69in2it69

Conclusion I've read on the president shooting is the bullet hit a telepropmpter and a piece of glass from it hit his ear.

The reason I believe this is the simulations shortly after of a near miss of an ear would have destroyed the ear lobe. The shockwave of the bullet alone would have pulverized the soft tissue of the ear. And that doesn't grow back. It could be reconstructed with plastic surgery to look sort of normal but it would take months to look just ok, and might need a couple surgeries to get right. His ear was healed up from whatever hit it in a few weeks.

...like mentioned no way of shooter to know if he was protected by a vest. Originally Posted by royamcr

Disagree totally. It would have been totally visible, given the level needed. It's not like he was wearing a polar parka. He was wearing a T-shirt.

You must watch too much John Wick flicks.

Just armchair experting here. We may never get a full ballistics report with video due to the sensitive nature.

I don't think we ever got a full report on trump either. Trump wants the narrative to be a near miss bullet cause it looks better than getting hit from a piece of glass.

if you say so





exactly.







why everyone has heard of pollywebart! why they are so famous they don't have a bias rating ... at all. bahahaa


let's see what the FBI and Utah police say about Kirk wearing a vest or not and the medical examiner's report.



and what difference at this point does it make? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

This is material for the political forum ? Originally Posted by VitaMan

You thought it was an apolitical rando that got bushwhacked, by another apolitical whack-job? This didn't happen in Baltimore or Chitcago on an average, random weekend. Also obvious on how quick some are compelled, no - commanded, to make it about Trump.

But, the OP was more geared towards the death of the AR15 narrative, i.e. being so super scary looking, holds a million rounds and is full auto, like a gatling gun, compared to something that is basically a single shooter and has been in use since the turn of the last century, yet is readily available globally.

Basically, it is an actual weapon of war, unlike the AR15, as the left-wing-nuts claim constantly in hyperventilating short breaths.

You are so cute. Must be butt hurt... Originally Posted by VitaMan

What exactly is your contribution to the OP topic?
But, good to know the hallways are safe under your watchful eye Karen.

But let's say the choice is between you and Time magazine:

TIME Cover After Charlie Kirk Assassination:
‘Enough,’ ‘Political Violence Haunting America’



What were your pointless questions again??