Encounter: Living wellness

A Quick Guess would be the corrections made by the Staff.

Date: 9/7/2025 (The Dr)
Name: CiCi (The Dr)
Phone: (412) 912-9588
Email Address: -
URL (Profile or Bio Page): -

Without the Date the Review is incomplete.

Additionally, the Providers name is a required data point established by the Owners.

Once a Review is rejected, the Local Staff cannot grant PA Credit any longer.

They must send it forward to the Administrator to add the PA Credit for the corrected Review to the Reviewers Account.

The Staff of Eccie are Volunteers and many of us (myself included) work a full time job and then come home to work the Forums.

I have been busy with other issues this evening, such as Threats of Outing and other violations of the Guidelines.

Each of the Staff Members a busy working behind the scenes keeping Eccie running.

Sometimes we are delayed in resolving one issue while working 2 or 3 more at the same time.

A great deal of the "hub-bub" created in this Thread had communications been done by PM using the RTM Function or email to Web Support.

Web Support can be reached by email at:

• websupport@eccie.net

Biomed, does rule #3 go both ways? All i said was that the Dr's. head was up someone ass. His response was Just another keyboard warrior wanting to complain. once this mess was cleared up by you once again the Dr. chimes in for one last dig, Had you given the staff an opportunity to do their jobs you would have known this but instead you prefer to bang away on your keyboard belittling everyone. He was the only one i challenged. He is the moderator shouldn't he be setting the example. So i ask again does the warnings go both ways? #3 Disrespect to others, IN GENERAL, will be considered an item of low tolerance, especially when posting in our coed forums. Follow the Golden Rule and treat others as you wish to be treated yourself. This applies to fellow members as well as staff. BTW: no one said you or the DR. had to respond on the open forum, you could have responded by PM or email.

ok mr. administrator, maybe you can explain to me and others WHY DOES THIS REVIEW NOT QUALIFY FOR PREMIUM ACCESS? Originally Posted by wrinkles

wrinkles,

You were the one that asked for clarity in the Forum.

So, I replied in the Forum for all to be able to see the reply you asked for.

Had I answered by PM to just you, the other Members would not have seen/read or heard the explanation you requested.

Additionally, had I replied by PM and you shared that reply in the Forum, that would have been a Violation of the Guidelines for Sharing Private Communications which is Guideline # 9.

#9 - No form of private communications between members are to be posted in our forums. This includes the contents of emails, PMs, IMs, private chat logs, privately shared images, etc. This is an invasion of another's privacy and will not be allowed.