Ingrassia - Trump still allows racists to work in the White House

You are going on my ignore list, DUDE. Originally Posted by cinderbella
I suggest you do what many do here and ignore this whole part of the site. Most women do. In fact, most ignore this whole site. And you have stumbled into the very reason why.

Empathy, compassion, and disagreement with the most frequent posters here is only met with scorn and simplistic insults.

Along with convenient mischaracterization of history and failure to acknowledge the dangers of ignoring it. Doomed to repeat, as they say.

Thanks for sharing a bit of it with us. Elie Wiesel would approve. He worked his entire life to remind people of what happened, warning them that it was continuing. But I suspect most here hate him too.
  • Tiny
  • 10-25-2025, 12:42 PM
I'm sorry, I know I am all over the place, but I am extremely concerned by the rise of Alt Right Christian White Nationalism. I understand that we have a plethora of human rights abuses currently happening, I am not excusing it. I am just really puzzled and concerned by the lack of understanding about the truth of what happened to human beings, because those like my late relative who witnessed some of it, these people and their memories, are now lost to history. Originally Posted by cinderbella
When I have posted about this in the past online, I was very surprised by responses from people who claimed that the occupiers and gestapo was somehow 'nice' and not mean to the people of Lyon. I am grateful that I have learned historical fact from an account of someone who was actually there and lived it. There was nothing 'nice' about it. No matter who your relative was, or what you may want to think about them if they were there as an occupier or gestapo. Nobody was being nice. Just like the obvious smell of death in a town where a concentration camp was located.

Hitler was not nice. Genocide is not nice. Originally Posted by cinderbella
I suggest you do what many do here and ignore this whole part of the site. Most women do. In fact, most ignore this whole site. And you have stumbled into the very reason why.

Empathy, compassion, and disagreement with the most frequent posters here is only met with scorn and simplistic insults.

Along with convenient mischaracterization of history and failure to acknowledge the dangers of ignoring it. Doomed to repeat, as they say.

Thanks for sharing a bit of it with us. Elie Wiesel would approve. He worked his entire life to remind people of what happened, warning them that it was continuing. But I suspect most here hate him too. Originally Posted by Mort Watt
I too would like to thank you Cinderbella for taking the time to write two excellent posts.

I don't recall anyone in this section of the forum ever defending Nazis. Characterizing forum members, or alt right Christian nationalists, or Republicans in general as pro-Nazi isn't true or fair. Many of their fathers, grandfathers and great grandfathers fought in World War II. They risked and some lost their lives fighting Nazis.

Ingrassia said “I do have a Nazi streak in me from time to time, I will admit it.” Who knows what the hell that means. That wasn't the reason certain Republican Senators forced the White House to pull Ingrassia's nomination. It was because he made racist remarks.

That's Blackman's point in the OP, that Ingrassia's a racist and yet he's still the White House's liaison to the DHS.

The party purged Young Republicans who made racist comments. The more conscientious Republican Senators prevented Ingrassia from becoming a Special Counsel. But that's not sufficient. The Republican Party must eliminate racists entirely from its ranks, or all those who support the Republican Party are racists or sympathizers of racists.

However, Blackman probably wouldn't demand the removal of the Democrat Los Angeles City Council members who made racist remarks. And I suspect neither of you would call for the Graham Platner, the leading candidate for the Democratic nomination for Senator in Maine and the person most likely to beat Susan Collins, to withdraw from the race. Platner has a Nazi symbol tattooed across his chest.

Blackman believes I'm a racist sympathizer. My son is a descendant of slaves. Why would I sympathize with racists?

The White House should fire Ingrassia or ask him to resign. Maybe it will. Trump's instinct is to refuse to back down when challenged, but maybe he'll end up doing the right thing.
I have seen Graham Platner speak. He is a racist asshole, and his "apology" was a joke. He should withdraw.
Unshockingly, the White House. As allowed someone that recently was a controversial racist to continue working in the White House. I thought republicans were against that kinda behavior and “punish” those folks by firing them. Maybe Trump likes racists. Or they are ok with him. Maybe the Republican Party just is ok with racism. Originally Posted by 1blackman1
As long as they do their job that's all that matters.
intldjgig's Avatar
As long as they do their job that's all that matters. Originally Posted by Levianon17
No. That is most definitely not all that matters. To claim that all an individual in a position of responsibility must do is “their job” ignores issues of scope (what are their job responsibilities; who determines those responsibilities; who holds them accountable for fulfilling those responsibilities), ethics (by what criteria are the person’s actions determined to be morally acceptable; how much human suffering as collateral damage is considered acceptable in pursuit of fulfilling a person’s responsibilities), and merit (why should the people accept someone in a position of authority or leadership when multiple other candidates without questionable ethical leanings exist).

Mussolini’s ability to make the trains run on time didn’t excuse the evil perpetrated at his direction. One of the key foundations of ethics is we as humans don’t play fast and loose with the suffering of others.
Unshockingly, the White House. As allowed someone that recently was a controversial racist to continue working in the White House. I thought republicans were against that kinda behavior and “punish” those folks by firing them. Maybe Trump likes racists. Or they are ok with him. Maybe the Republican Party just is ok with racism. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

You're just now waking up to that?


No. That is most definitely not all that matters. To claim that all an individual in a position of responsibility must do is “their job” ignores issues of scope (what are their job responsibilities; who determines those responsibilities; who holds them accountable for fulfilling those responsibilities), ethics (by what criteria are the person’s actions determined to be morally acceptable; how much human suffering as collateral damage is considered acceptable in pursuit of fulfilling a person’s responsibilities), and merit (why should the people accept someone in a position of authority or leadership when multiple other candidates without questionable ethical leanings exist).

Mussolini’s ability to make the trains run on time didn’t excuse the evil perpetrated at his direction. One of the key foundations of ethics is we as humans don’t play fast and loose with the suffering of others. Originally Posted by intldjgig
Like I said, doing one's job and doing it correctly is first and foremost. Whether someone is racist or not is immaterial unless they act upon it.
intldjgig's Avatar
Hypothetically, perhaps. But there’s a logical reason why we don’t employ alcoholics as quality control tasters for spirits, thieves as night security for the jewelry store, or others to serve in roles where their predispositions could increase the likelihood of behavior that harms themselves or others.

You can’t blame a snake for being a snake, that much is true. But you can point your finger at the dunce in the mirror if you let the snake hang out in the henhouse and all the eggs somehow disappear.
BillyThekid420's Avatar
I’m a conservative myself, born and raised in Texas. I think the biggest issue right now is political polarization. To be fair, I’m not a big fan of Trump either as his administration went too far on some things, and his way of attacking opponents doesn’t help (though democrats aren’t innocent on that front either).

From my perspective, Trump isn’t the best choice for Republicans, and I honestly don’t understand why the party keeps backing him. They could've chosen someone who is more centrist and would like to depolarize the situation.
Hypothetically, perhaps. But there’s a logical reason why we don’t employ alcoholics as quality control tasters for spirits, thieves as night security for the jewelry store, or others to serve in roles where their predispositions could increase the likelihood of behavior that harms themselves or others.

You can’t blame a snake for being a snake, that much is true. But you can point your finger at the dunce in the mirror if you let the snake hang out in the henhouse and all the eggs somehow disappear. Originally Posted by intldjgig
Well think about the true nature of an Alcoholic, which by the way is an actual disease or the true nature of a thief? Of course, it wouldn't be prudent to place them in a position where their dysfunction would be manifested. A racist on the other hand simply dislikes a particular group or groups of people based on up bringing, personal experience or opinion based upon personal observations.
texassapper's Avatar
I’m a conservative myself, born and raised in Texas....They could've chosen someone who is more centrist and would like to depolarize the situation. Originally Posted by BillyThekid420
Basically you want to lose your Nation more slowly.

You realize who was a Nazi before Trump was? Yeah that squishy ghey loser from Utah, Mitch Romney.

You know who was a Nazi before him? GWB. Yeah, big talkin, no fightin, W who likes to play grab ass with Michelle Obama.

You know who was a Nazi before him? GHB. I even got bags of pigs blood thrown at me while in uniform during his administration...

You know who was a Nazi before him? Ronald Reagan.

There is NO Republican candidate whom the leftists will not villify and cast as a Nazi. Why? Because it's not us... its them. That's why we have Trump... and if Trump is unable to bring the administrative state/leftist cabal to heel... The next guy we get is gonna make Trump look like a Romney.
....

From my perspective, Trump isn’t the best choice for Republicans, and I honestly don’t understand why the party keeps backing him. They could've chosen someone who is more centrist and would like to depolarize the situation. Originally Posted by BillyThekid420
Basically you want to lose your Nation more slowly.....
Originally Posted by texassapper
He didn't say that. What he DID say seemed pretty reasonable. At least more so than the continual deranged brainwashed rants about the "administrative state/leftist cabal."
texassapper's Avatar
He didn't say that. What he DID say seemed pretty reasonable. Originally Posted by Mort Watt
LOL... The divisiveness in this nation is not due to Trump. The fact that all previous GOP nominees and Presidents have been compared to Hitler ought to clue you in.
txdot-guy's Avatar
LOL... The divisiveness in this nation is not due to Trump. The fact that all previous GOP nominees and Presidents have been compared to Hitler ought to clue you in. Originally Posted by texassapper
First of all are you sure about that statement? “all previous GOP nominees and Presidents have been compared to Hitler”. That’s just not true.

And you’re right that the division in our country is not due to Trump. But he surely ratcheted up the hateful rhetoric to eleven.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
First of all are you sure about that statement? “all previous GOP nominees and Presidents have been compared to Hitler”. That’s just not true.

And you’re right that the division in our country is not due to Trump. But he surely ratcheted up the hateful rhetoric to eleven. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

what hateful rhetoric? calling out Hispanics for some of them and a large minority we are finding out are indeed bad hombres like Trump said? that's not hateful it's the truth.


it's true enough. the Democrats have repeatedly referred to Republican presidents and nominees as NAZI and Fascist.

only Eisenhower for obvious reasons wasn't labeled a NAZI the rest over 60 years have been.

this is the tactic of your party. you know it. everyone knows it.


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...minee-fascist/