Grandiosity is chiefly associated with narcissistic personality disorder, but also commonly features in manic or hypomanic episodes of bipolar disorder.[1]
It refers to an unrealistic sense of superiority, a sustained view of oneself as better than others that causes the narcissist to view others with disdain or as inferior. It also refers to a sense of uniqueness, the belief that few others have anything in common with oneself and that one can only be understood by a few or very special people
- WTF
- 11-29-2011, 07:30 AM
- Marshall
- 11-29-2011, 07:32 AM
This is what you call a flip flopper! You might have passed Marshy on the speaking out of both sides of your mouth scale! LOLbigmex, CuteOldGay doesn't even know if he is on the left or right......when he hires a provider, it's probably one with tits and a dick because he can't figure out what he wants.....he's a confused old man......
In post #3 COG said "Scott Walker is a statesman trying to hold back the tide of tyranny sweeping across the country." (His words not mine) Fast forward to post #12, after he had been proven wrong, COG admits that he "really know(s) nothing" of Scott Walker but "if you think any of these clowns have your best interest at heart, you will be gravely disappointed." (Once again, his words not mine)
Which one is it COG, is Walker a true American statesman or just another "clown, (who does not) have your best interest at heart?"
COG, I hate to be the bearer of bad news but you are the one looking like a "clown!"
BTW: moi? speaking outta both sides of my mouth? What are you referring to? If you can't come up with quotes of mine that demonstrate that I speak out of both sides of my mouth, then that will be an admission by you that you've had gay sex with CuteOldGay........
- CuteOldGuy
- 11-29-2011, 07:36 AM
Tex, that was a JOKE! Is there anything in any of my posts to lead you to believe I think there are any Democrat or Republican statesman? I was responding to your absurd post with an absurdity of my own. I think power and money have corrupted the vast majority of politicians both Democrat and Republican, and Walker is, and always has been, included in that number. So he got one issue right, it happens, but mainly by accident.
Geez, laugh once in awhile. Life's too short.
Geez, laugh once in awhile. Life's too short.
- CuteOldGuy
- 11-29-2011, 07:38 AM
bigmex, CuteOldGay doesn't even know if he is on the left or right......when he hires a provider, it's probably one with tits and a dick because he can't figure out what he wants.....he's a confused old man...... Originally Posted by MarshallWrong. I am neither left nor right. And believe me, I require my dates to have a vagina, and not one of those mechanical ones. I want a real one. I'm not that old or confused. My little head is avoiding senility much better than my big head.
- WTF
- 11-29-2011, 07:44 AM
- Guest050715-1
- 11-29-2011, 07:55 AM
With the petition now circulating to oust Gov. Scott Walker, I thought we would get some inside info on how it was going from Mazo. But nothing. Come to think of it, nothing has been heard from the Mazo front for some time.He's probably in Angryville getting rides in helicopters to and from casinos or to Know-it-all-land.
Anyone have any insight?? Originally Posted by charlestudor2005
- Whirlaway
- 11-29-2011, 07:56 AM
From Michael Barone:
Winning in 2010 and soon after implementing major government union reforms, the conservative Walker has been a constant recipient of attacks by teachers unions and other powerful anti-taxpayer groups. Given that the mainstream media died years ago basically everwhere, I can’t imagine that the state’s local media has been kind to him.
All things considered, Scott Walker has a rather healthy approval rating of 47%, according to an Oct. 26 poll by the polling firm PPP, a Democratic company. The poll also tested the results of several potential Democratic challengers.
Wisconsin last voted for a Republican in 1984, when Ronald Reagan won 49 out of 50 states, though George W. Bush did come close. In 2008, Barack Obama easily carried the state with 56% of the vote.
Obama barely performs better than Scott Walker in the state. A July 2011 poll by the University of Wisconsin-Madison placed Obama’s approval at 50%. In August, Gallup also showed Obama at a 50% approval rating in Wisconsin.
Comparing Wisconsin to the heavily Republican Kansas, Gov. Sam Brownback only had a 51% approval rating in a July SurveyUSA poll; the same poll found President Obama with a 36% approval rating. John McCain won 57% of the Kansas vote in November 2008. And this so-so approval rating is with Brownback fighting none of the battles fought by Walker. The pro-life bills signed by Brownback are hardly controversial: few people object to requirements for clean abortions clinics, and bans on abortions on 22-week-old, unborn babies who can survive outside the womb. And the government-funded arts community that Brownback offended by reforming the state arts authority, well, that cannot be compared to the well-funded and vengeful National Education Association that Wisconsin Gov. Walker stood up to.
At The Washington Examiner, Michael Barone writes that PPP’s “latest findings show a trend over the year toward Republican Governor Scott Walker and against the Democrats who attempted, unsuccessfully, to elect a pliant state Supreme Court justice and to recall enough state senators to overturn the Republican majority in that chamber.”
Barone thinks, “It’s looking like Walker and Wisconsin Republicans are going to win their fight, though the margins have been close.”
This can serve as reassurance to elected officials nation-wide that they can be reformers for the public good, and still remain electable.
Winning in 2010 and soon after implementing major government union reforms, the conservative Walker has been a constant recipient of attacks by teachers unions and other powerful anti-taxpayer groups. Given that the mainstream media died years ago basically everwhere, I can’t imagine that the state’s local media has been kind to him.
All things considered, Scott Walker has a rather healthy approval rating of 47%, according to an Oct. 26 poll by the polling firm PPP, a Democratic company. The poll also tested the results of several potential Democratic challengers.
Wisconsin last voted for a Republican in 1984, when Ronald Reagan won 49 out of 50 states, though George W. Bush did come close. In 2008, Barack Obama easily carried the state with 56% of the vote.
Obama barely performs better than Scott Walker in the state. A July 2011 poll by the University of Wisconsin-Madison placed Obama’s approval at 50%. In August, Gallup also showed Obama at a 50% approval rating in Wisconsin.
Comparing Wisconsin to the heavily Republican Kansas, Gov. Sam Brownback only had a 51% approval rating in a July SurveyUSA poll; the same poll found President Obama with a 36% approval rating. John McCain won 57% of the Kansas vote in November 2008. And this so-so approval rating is with Brownback fighting none of the battles fought by Walker. The pro-life bills signed by Brownback are hardly controversial: few people object to requirements for clean abortions clinics, and bans on abortions on 22-week-old, unborn babies who can survive outside the womb. And the government-funded arts community that Brownback offended by reforming the state arts authority, well, that cannot be compared to the well-funded and vengeful National Education Association that Wisconsin Gov. Walker stood up to.
At The Washington Examiner, Michael Barone writes that PPP’s “latest findings show a trend over the year toward Republican Governor Scott Walker and against the Democrats who attempted, unsuccessfully, to elect a pliant state Supreme Court justice and to recall enough state senators to overturn the Republican majority in that chamber.”
Barone thinks, “It’s looking like Walker and Wisconsin Republicans are going to win their fight, though the margins have been close.”
This can serve as reassurance to elected officials nation-wide that they can be reformers for the public good, and still remain electable.