Explain To Me..........

NYB,

We need to catch up. Coke or Pepsi?

There is no such drink as a Pepsi and Jack or Crown and Pepsi, its all Coke or at least should be.

Now, I'm just curious....if the posts aren't about you personally...then what is the friggin problem. I apperciate ANY INFO, regardless of how old it is, as most tigers don't change their spots.

I believe Elena is speaking for all providers. And what she says does make sense. If one such lady has had issues in the past with one such gent, why rehash it over and over and over.....

When doing your research looking for a potential provider, do you really need to see that Mr.X didn't like her for whatever reason on each of her reviews? Isn't it enough that he write his own review or comment once at best?

The dispute here isn't the negative comment/review, but the redundancy of such comments.

In truth, I think its malicious and spiteful..

Well, since tigers don't have spots we don't have to worry about that do we?

I don't know these ladies personally, but its costing them money (per other comments made).

I could see if it was a consistent problem that the ladies have with numerous clients, but according to the reviews.....its not. Its just a problem with certain people. How valuable is the information if its not of a recent problem? How valuable is the information if you keep seeing it over and over about the same ladies?

Would you like it if a person kept making negative comments about your business and costing you money? And before anyone tries to equate this business with some other business, its not the same because escorts don't have the same amount of foot traffic that 99% of other businesses have.

Just like with any business, some of the ladies I've seen bad reviews on have changed for the better. Just not in Omaha, but in other cities. Y'all have commented on how bad some ladies were, but then time goes by and her reviews get better because her service changed for the better.

So......yes, a tiger can change its spots.

Well thats good to know. If we have a bad experience we should just comment one time at best. I'm sure that would be quite helpful.

It would probably be more appreciated by the ladies if we only said good things all the time regardless of the actual experience.

It seems that's what they're lookin' for Burk.

Some of you may think it's spiteful or petty but as a customer, I think it's useful information. Knowledge is power after all, even if it's old knowledge.

What should the statute of limitations be on such information? 6 months.. a year... 2 years? If I want to see a lady, I may not read all her past reviews so I think it's helpful to see reminders if she has had problems in the past.

If some guy here treated a lady poorly or stiffed her on her fee, would you ladies want that information available? Even if the incidents were old and the guy had been behaving himself lately, I would think you would at least want to know about any problems so you could better decide whether to see him.Then you could make that choice based on both his current and past behavior.

I suspect you'd be pretty pissed if he fell into old habits, ripped you off and you found out he had done it before but nobody was bothering to keep that info current.

It's all about information. I think both men and women here should have as much as possible.

I take a lot of things into consideration when I choose a woman. I don't necessarily discount someone because of some negative comments on reviews. If a guy really has the hots for a particular woman, he'll see her regardless of what anyone says about her. Guys are dumb that way. If a lady is hurting for business, I suspect there are other reasons besides comments left on her reviews.

Some of y'all really do have selective reading don't you?

Where did I say or suggest that you only leave positive comments or reviews? Please show me. I have said several times that reviews are great for both parties. If you cared to read before commenting, you'd see that.

If some guy stiffed me, I'd give him the chance to make it right and if he didn't I'd post an alert and then add him to numerous DNS sites. But, I wouldn't go out of my way to post a comment about him everytime his name came up. If he dared to use me as a reference, of course I'd tell the lady about him. But, I doubt he'd be stupid enough to do that. I can't keep updating the DNS sites about him because I don't know what his behavior is like a yr or two down the road. Maybe he learned his lesson, maybe he hasn't. But, I guarantee if he hasn't changed, some other lady will add his name to the DNS sites after I did.

What some of you fail to comprehend from my post is this......use this as an example:

1. John Doe calls Jane Doe for a date. She NCNS him. He's pissed, but finds another date.

2. A few months later some guy reviews Jane Doe. John Doe throws his comment out there about her NCNSing him.

3. A few weeks go by, another review comes up of Jane Doe. John Doe throws the same comment out again in this review.

4. Another 10 reviews come up over a span of 14 mths of Jane Doe. John Doe throws the same comment out in each review.

5. Reviews come up of at least 4 different ladies and John Doe does the same exact thing.

Redundant? Helpful?

I will ask again, how is the same damn comment from the same person about the same lady helpful? There's no new information added in those comments, its the same comment......over and over. In this business the lady either cleans up her act or most of her reviews are going to be the same.....bad.


AGAIN, your reviews should be honest whether they're good or bad. It helps both the guys and the ladies.

Elena, i see what youre saying, but its more helpful than you might think. If I am considering meeting a provider, I dont just want to know what she has been like lately, I want to know what behavior she has shown in the past. But in the end, its my choice to see or not to see her. For example, i think we all know Burk's thoughts on Cherisa Starr. She has a ton of great reviews, and some not so good. Burk comments on alot of her newer reviews because his experience with her wasnt a good one. I have come to EXPECT Burks comment on her review, but if the timing worked out, I would still see her in a heartbeat because the good outweighs the bad imo. Maybe not everyone likes to see the same thing over and over again, but at the end of the day, if someone wants to know about a girl without reading every review shes ever had, those comments can be helpful. After all, thats what the comment section of the reviews are for. That and lots of "pat on the backs" lol

I believe Elena is speaking for all providers. And what she says does make sense. If one such lady has had issues in the past with one such gent, why rehash it over and over and over.....

When doing your research looking for a potential provider, do you really need to see that Mr.X didn't like her for whatever reason on each of her reviews? Isn't it enough that he write his own review or comment once at best?

The dispute here isn't the negative comment/review, but the redundancy of such comments.

In truth, I think its malicious and spiteful.. Originally Posted by kendra kayy

100% off subject here.....but......how is this the first time Ive seen your profile picture? lol hey congrats on having awesome tits! lol

Damn it, AJKinNE!

Now you've gone and given up the secret of how easily us guys are distracted by a pair of boobs! I don't think they even suspected we were so easily manipulated!

Doh!

Thank you AJ.

MP, boobs are like catnip for guys.

Some of y'all really do have selective reading don't you?

Where did I say or suggest that you only leave positive comments or reviews? Please show me. I have said several times that reviews are great for both parties. If you cared to read before commenting, you'd see that.

If some guy stiffed me, I'd give him the chance to make it right and if he didn't I'd post an alert and then add him to numerous DNS sites. But, I wouldn't go out of my way to post a comment about him everytime his name came up. If he dared to use me as a reference, of course I'd tell the lady about him. But, I doubt he'd be stupid enough to do that. I can't keep updating the DNS sites about him because I don't know what his behavior is like a yr or two down the road. Maybe he learned his lesson, maybe he hasn't. But, I guarantee if he hasn't changed, some other lady will add his name to the DNS sites after I did.

What some of you fail to comprehend from my post is this......use this as an example:

1. John Doe calls Jane Doe for a date. She NCNS him. He's pissed, but finds another date.

2. A few months later some guy reviews Jane Doe. John Doe throws his comment out there about her NCNSing him.

3. A few weeks go by, another review comes up of Jane Doe. John Doe throws the same comment out again in this review.

4. Another 10 reviews come up over a span of 14 mths of Jane Doe. John Doe throws the same comment out in each review.

5. Reviews come up of at least 4 different ladies and John Doe does the same exact thing.

Redundant? Helpful?

I will ask again, how is the same damn comment from the same person about the same lady helpful? There's no new information added in those comments, its the same comment......over and over. In this business the lady either cleans up her act or most of her reviews are going to be the same.....bad.


AGAIN, your reviews should be honest whether they're good or bad. It helps both the guys and the ladies. Originally Posted by MsElena

It may be redundant but it's also helpful, especially for newer guys who might not have read any of her reviews before. If he sees that negative comment he might be more inclined to dig deeper into her past reviews and then make a more informed decision on whether or not to see her. If she has multiple good reviews, even with some bad comments he'll probably still see her but at least now he knows what to look out for.

It's obvious you'll never see it this way and that's fine because ultimately these reviews aren't for your benefit, they're for ours.