My deduction is based on my belief that main stream media is biased to the right and that they are dishonest. I believe this because I have observed biased dishonest behavior by the main stream media my entire life.
If the main stream media is biased to the right and dishonest, it stands to reason that they will want to portray Trayvon as a gansta thug whether he is or not. If main stream media reports scant information about Trayvon's background. It's reasonable to assume they couldn't find exculpatory information and that's why they don't have much to say. It's like the old saying "If you can't find anyting bad to say, then you should make some stories up and put up pictures of the wrong person "
The same reasoning applies to the lack of details about Zimmerman. It's reasonable to assume that background research has been done about him. If the dishonest, biased, right leaning media has little to say about Zimmerman's background, it's reasonable to assume that they weren't looking too hard to find anything bad.
Originally Posted by joe bloe
Fixed that for you.
So what are these terrible things they have found out about Trayvon?
- he was wearing a hoodie
- he was found once with an empty plastic bag with some traces
- he shares the same name as some youtube idiots
Doesn't seem too different from the average teenager.
The principle idiots in all this are those who jump on bandwagons without getting all the evidence first.
I have no idea what happened, probably only Zimmerman will ever know what happened, I am ready to believe either party or both were to blame, or it was all an unintended accident and they were both innocent.