judges have ordered women sterilized, this guy should have been done years ago.
After the first few, how dumb do you have to be to keep knocking up women who know your real name?
judges have ordered women sterilized, this guy should have been done years ago.Sterilization for a woman is tubal ligation. It's analogous to a vasectomy for a male. It's not the same as castrating a male; they don't take the woman's ovaries. Norplant accomplishes the same thing as "tying the tubes" as long as the implant stays in place.
After the first few, how dumb do you have to be to keep knocking up women who know your real name? Originally Posted by jackbeingbad
Castration goes too far and isn't necessary. The better system is mandatory Norplants for the females, after the first illegitimate baby. No Norplant, no welfare. If they remove the Norplant or refuse the implant. No welfare. The current system pays people to breed out of wedlock babies. It has created a permanent underclass of Democrat voters. Originally Posted by joe bloe
WTF wants to take away the future Democratic base. Yes and the GOP base too. It would help to have poor ignorant folks from having babies until they are on sound monetary footing.That slut was right to ask for birth control. The guys have their Viagria covered.
Walk into any Planned Parenthood WTF and you can walk out with a big handful of free condoms. Yes you can and you idiotic Tea Baggers want to end this practice! Guaranteed. The women are walking into the WIC offices instead! They don't have to worry about their gasoline or their rent and soon their healthcare!
That slut from Georgetown only fooled you! Originally Posted by gnadfly
Why not just provide free birth control? You Rush Limbaush loving right wingers get your panties in a wad when that is an option , yet you do not mind giving it to them after they have had a kid?
Hot Damn , I'm not a smart man but that is some crazy ass logic to me.Originally Posted by WTF
That slut was right to ask for birth control. The guys have their Viagria covered.Blacks are dramatically more likely to be on welfare than whites. Approximately 9.7% (one in ten) of whites are on welfare. Approximately 33.7% (one in three) of blacks are on welfare. Blacks are approximately three and one half times more likely to be on welfare than whites. It may be the actual number of whites on welfare is greater than the number of blacks. That's because whites are 63.7% of the population and blacks are 12.6% of the population. There are more than five times as many whites as blacks.
http://kathmanduk2.wordpress.com/200...ack-and-white/
The majority of Americans who receive welfare checks are not Black. The majority of those who receive welfare checks are White people.
More, you want more...here are more myths, debunked.
The government writes retirement and disability benefit checks to 35.4 million recipients of whom 88.7 percent are White and 9.6 percent are Black. The reason behind this shocking disparity is perhaps the most lamentable of all: The life expectancy rate for Blacks is six times shorter than that of Whites, meaning Black workers spend years paying into a retirement system only to have White retirees reap the benefits for a longer time
Do you have a mortage? I don't hear you griping about that subsidy!
The tax subsidies benefit the middle-class and upper-class sections of the American population, sections which involve high numbers of Whites.
The Deductibility of Mortgage Interest on Owner-Occupied Housing was the largest homeownership tax subsidy in 2006, constituting 44.1 percent of such tax spending and 43.4 percent of total homeownership assistance. The top income quintile (or richest 20 percent of the population) claimed the vast majority of benefits at 81.5 percent—more than four times the share of the lower four quintiles combined. Originally Posted by WTF