Governemnts are always up to no good but to get caught like this is just .... wow.

2004 to 2009.

Who was President then? Originally Posted by Doove

COF is a lawyer, that question is too difficult.

Doove, why are you trying to bait into defending Bush? I've already said on several occasions that he was a disaster, and should be in prison. If he was complicit in any of this, then that only supports my assertion.

You, however, always seem to fall back to the position that if Bush did it, and got away with it, then Obama should get away with it, too. That is an incredibly stupid position to have. It tells me you think Obama is no better than Bush, and we are wrong to expect Obama to behave better than Bush did.

Whatever Bush did, whatever his role in this does not mitigate what Obama has done in furtherance of this corrupt, criminal policy.

Sorry, some of us expected better from Obama than we did from Bush. You apparently didn't. I guess that's why you're not disappointed.

Doove, why are you trying to bait into defending Bush? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I'm not trying to bait anyone into defending Bush, though everyone in here was busy claiming Bush had nothing to do with any of it.

It was a simple question. The article states this took place from 2004 to 2009.

Apparently Obama's not corrupt enough to off the guy who has this information on him. No, he'd rather put him in an American jail and put him on trial for the whole world to see.

Kind of destroys the entire premise you've been pushing on here for 2 years.

For all you or anyone else knows, the Executive Privilege is protecting Bush.

Either way, the administration should comply with the subpoena. And I doubt they're protecting Bush.