No wonder Obama was confused

CuteOldGuy's Avatar
youre an idiot ... anyone who makes you or any other rightwinger look like an idiot automatically defends obie ... youre a broken record, get some new material Originally Posted by CJ7
When haven't you defended Obama? That's right, you ALWAYS defend Obama.
joe bloe's Avatar
direct transcript from the rose garden


No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.


listenng to JD an idiot would believe the prez didnt say act of terror in the rose garden ... read the transcript JD before you insist on being an idiot, you idiot.

see how that works COF ? Originally Posted by CJ7
If he thought it was terrorism, right from the start. Why did he spend two weeks telling everyone it wasn't terrorism. He can't have it both ways.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 10-25-2012, 05:23 PM
If he thought it was terrorism, right from the start. Why did he spend two weeks telling everyone it wasn't terrorism. He can't have it both ways. Originally Posted by joe bloe
unlike whirlie et al some people would rather be 100% sure before they address the entire world and point a finger at anyone for anything regardless how tragic it was ...
joe bloe's Avatar
unlike whirlie et al some people would rather be 100% sure before they address the entire world and point a finger at anyone for anything regardless how tragic it was ... Originally Posted by CJ7
Obama told everyone Benghazi was all about a video when he 100% sure it had nothing to do with a video.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 10-25-2012, 05:30 PM
Obama told everyone Benghazi was all about a video when he 100% sure it had nothing to do with a video. Originally Posted by joe bloe

sure would like to see a direct quote
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 10-25-2012, 05:37 PM
here joey, lemme help

Obama gave an interview with CBS’s “60 Minutes” just 14 hours after the attack took place. During the interview, which was scheduled before the assault unfolded, the president said that he did not believe that the Benghazi violence was due solely to random mob action.
“You’re right that this is not a situation that was — exactly the same as what happened in Egypt and my suspicion is that there are folks involved in this who were looking to target Americans from the start,” Obama told journalist Steve Kroft.


yeppers, thats damn sure Obie blaming it on the tape ... he said it "was the tape" plain as day

if you live in la la land and hear shit that nobody ever says
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
CJ? Do you consider yourself very smart? That little bit from the interview was not broadcast by CBS at the time. Still Obama in front of America, the View, Letterman, and the UN saying it was the video when he knew otherwise. In other words, he was lying like a rug. I should point out that calling murderous terrorists "folks" is a little unsettling in a chief of state. Of course, last week Obama channeled Reagan and now Obama is trying to channel Bill O'Reilly.
I B Hankering's Avatar
sure would like to see a direct quote Originally Posted by CJ7
Here's your "quote", dumbass. This is what Odumbo's lying ass said fourteen days after the attack:

That is what we saw play out the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world. I have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this video, and I believe its message must be rejected by all who respect our common humanity. It is an insult not only to Muslims, but to America as well - for as the city outside these walls makes clear, we are a country that has welcomed people of every race and religion. We are home to Muslims who worship across our country. We not only respect the freedom of religion - we have laws that protect individuals from being harmed because of how they look or what they believe. We understand why people take offense to this video because millions of our citizens are among them.
I know there are some who ask why we don't just ban such a video. The answer is enshrined in our laws: our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech. Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense. Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs. Moreover, as President of our country, and Commander-in-Chief of our military, . . . .There are no words that excuse the killing of innocents. There is no video that justifies an attack on an Embassy. There is no slander that provides an excuse for people to burn a restaurant in Lebanon, or destroy a school in Tunis, or cause death and destruction in Pakistan." Odumbo’s September 25 UN Speech.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 10-26-2012, 01:48 AM
eat shit JD, youre a proven moron.

yet sans the circle speak ... There is no video that justifies an attack on an Embassy


theres still no direct quote saying ' the whitehouse blamed the attack on the video".. just typical shape words to fit an agenda.


yaaaaaaaawn
One lie leads to another lie, leading to another lie until you no longer have control over your lies. That's how you get caught. I bet Pres. Obama can't wait for November 6 so he can move on with his life and not have to worry about lying anymore, better yet, getting caught.
I B Hankering's Avatar
eat shit JD, youre a proven moron.

yet sans the circle speak ... There is no video that justifies an attack on an Embassy


theres still no direct quote saying ' the whitehouse blamed the attack on the video".. just typical shape words to fit an agenda.


yaaaaaaaawn Originally Posted by CJ7
Eat shit CBJ7, here's two more "quotes (transcripts)" from the White House, you moronic jackass. This is what Odumbo and Carney's lying asses said after the attack:

[SIZE="3"] 14 September White House press briefing:

Q Jay, thanks very much. On the Libya attacks, was there any intelligence in advance that some kind of attack could take place, especially because so many embassies were taking precautions because of 9/11? Was there any advance warning at all?

MR. CARNEY: I have seen that report, and the story is absolutely wrong. We were not aware of any actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi was planned or imminent. That report is false. . . .
MR. CARNEY: Let me say a couple of things. First of all, we are obviously closely monitoring developments in the region today. You saw that following the incidents in response to this video, the President directed the administration to take a number of steps to prepare for continued unrest. . . .

Now is a time when Americans should be coming together. The President is attending a ceremony this afternoon for the return of remains of four U.S. personnel who were killed in Libya as a result of this unrest. . . .

Q Why was there not adequate security around Ambassador Stevens?

MR. CARNEY: . . . .

Q Wouldn’t it seem logical that the anniversary of 9/11 would be a time that you would want to have extra security around diplomats and military posts?

MR. CARNEY: Well, as you know, we are very vigilant around anniversaries like 9/11. The President is always briefed and brought up to speed on all the precautions being taken. But let’s be --

Q But saying you’re very vigilant and being very vigilant are different things.

MR. CARNEY: Jake, let’s be clear, these protests were in reaction to a video that had spread to the region --

Q At Benghazi? What happened at Benghazi --

MR. CARNEY: We certainly don't know. We don't know otherwise. We have no information to suggest that it was a preplanned attack. The unrest we’ve seen around the region has been in reaction to a video that Muslims, many Muslims find offensive. And while the violence is reprehensible and unjustified, it is not a reaction to the 9/11 anniversary that we know of, or to U.S. policy.

Q But the group around the Benghazi post was well armed. It was a well-coordinated attack. Do you think it was a spontaneous protest against a movie?

MR. CARNEY: Look, this is obviously under investigation, and I don’t have –

Q But your operating assumption is that that was in response to the video, in Benghazi? I just want to clear that up. That’s the framework? That’s the operating assumption?

MR. CARNEY: Look, it’s not an assumption --

Q Because there are administration officials who don’t -- who dispute that, who say that it looks like this was something other than a protest.

MR. CARNEY: I think there has been news reports on this, Jake, even in the press, which some of it has been speculative. What I’m telling you is this is under investigation. The unrest around the region has been in response to this video. We do not, at this moment, have information to suggest or to tell you that would indicate that any of this unrest was preplanned.

What is true about Libya is that -- well, a couple of things. One, is it’s one of the more pro-American countries in the region. Two, it is a very new government; it is a country that has just come out of a revolution and a lot of turmoil, and there are certainly a lot of armed groups. So the fact that there are weapons in the region and the new government is not -- is still building up its capacities in terms of security and its ability to ensure the security of facilities, is not necessarily reflective of anything except for the remarkable transformation that’s been going on in the region.

Q Jay, my last question. It was said that what happened on 9/11 was a failure of imagination, failure of American policymakers and counterterrorism officials to anticipate the kind of attack that could have taken place. This would seem to be the exact opposite. Was this a failure by the Obama administration? Did the President and his administration mess up in any way?

MR. CARNEY: Jake, again, what we have seen is unrest around the region in response to a video that Muslims find offensive, many Muslims find offensive. We have seen incidents like this in the past, in reaction to other actions -- cartoons and other actions that have been taken, that have been -- have led to protests and violence in the region. And we have managed those situations, and we are working to ensure that our diplomatic personnel and our diplomatic facilities are secure as we deal with the response to this video, which we believe is offensive and disgusting. . . .

Q You’ve mentioned a number of times now that this was in response to a video or a film. . .

MR. CARNEY: Well, the reason why there is unrest is because of the film; this is in response to the film. I don’t doubt --

Q Well, that’s what sparked it. You think that’s what sparked it.

MR. CARNEY: We do think that’s what sparked it.

Etc., etc., etc.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-...carney-9142012
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++

Odumbo's 20 September UNIVISION interview:

Q: We know in Libya, four Americans were killed. We know now that Ambassador Chris Stevens warned about security days before he was killed. Many people want to know whether -- if you expected so much anti-American sentiment in the Islamic world. And why wasn't your administration better prepared with more security at our embassies on September 11?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, first of all, obviously we mourn the loss of the Americans who were killed in Benghazi. But I think it's important to understand that that’s not representative of the attitudes of the Libyan people towards America, because they understand because of the incredible work that our diplomats did as well as our men and women in uniform, we liberated that country from a dictator who had terrorized them for 40 years. And Chris Stevens, the ambassador there, was one of the leaders of that process. So when he was killed, there were vigils in Libya but also in front of the White House expressing the deep sorrow that the Libyan people felt towards them.

What we've seen over the last week, week and a half, is something that actually we've seen in the past, where there is an offensive video or cartoon directed at the prophet Muhammad. And this is obviously something that then is used as an excuse by some to carry out inexcusable violent acts directed at Westerners or Americans.

And my number-one priority is always to keep our diplomats safe and to keep our embassies safe. And so when the initial events happened in Cairo and all across the region, we worked with Secretary Clinton to redouble our security and to send a message to the leaders of these countries, essentially saying, although we had nothing to do with the video, we find it offensive, it's not representative of America's views, how we treat each other with respect when it comes to their religious beliefs, but we will not tolerate violence.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...on_115533.html
I B Hankering's Avatar
Your silence is deafening, CBJ7.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 10-26-2012, 02:37 PM
because Im feeling generous today I'll grant you 1 reply

let’s be clear, these protests were in reaction to a video that had spread to the region --

protests, not the ATTACK and/or killings ..

inasmuch as stupid shitstains such as yourself have an extermely difficult time with context or simply spin words and statements to suit whatever miniscule agenda youre hopelessly trying to support I wont waste any more of my time with you.

The End.
Odumbo was referring to the events of 9/11 2001, jackass. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You've made that assertion before, I have asked you for evidence for this assertion, nd you have provided none.

Another fantasy lie by the (fill in the blanks) gang of 5 (IBH, JDB, W, JB, a n other).
I B Hankering's Avatar
because Im feeling generous today I'll grant you 1 reply

let’s be clear, these protests were in reaction to a video that had spread to the region --

protests, not the ATTACK and/or killings ..

inasmuch as stupid shitstains such as yourself have an extermely difficult time with context or simply spin words and statements to suit whatever miniscule agenda youre hopelessly trying to support I wont waste any more of my time with you.

The End. Originally Posted by CJ7
Jay Carney claims otherwise, CBJ7: "You saw that following the incidents in response to this video, the President directed the administration to take a number of steps to prepare for continued unrest. . . . The President is attending a ceremony this afternoon for the return of remains of four U.S. personnel who were killed in Libya as a result of this unrest. . . ."


And Odumbo said: "What we've seen over the last week, week and a half [i.e., "the loss of the Americans who were killed in Benghazi"], is something that actually we've seen in the past, where there is an offensive video or cartoon directed at the prophet Muhammad. And this is obviously something that then is used as an excuse by some to carry out inexcusable violent acts directed at Westerners or Americans."