You mean like these guys?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybel...consensus-not/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...global_warming
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/...l_warming.html
http://ricochet.com/main-feed/50-NAS...Global-Warming
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
CoG, you did not read my post, or maybe your language skills are not sufficiently tuned to understand nuance.
It is to possible accept there is no consenses, there is no proof, there are conflicting arguments, there are differences of opinion. That is all normal in the world of science.
I repeat that scientists should not talk in the language of proof or belief.
Yes, despite all that, as I said above, to dismiss any concern is ridiculous.
So, CoG, what is your level of concern?
I found the wiki link quite useful. A reasonable summary.
Any projection will have uncertainty. Any projection should include a range of uncertainty, or, better, a probability distribution.
Most people find handling uncertainty unfamiliar, and prefer the 'there is/is not global warming', which is a completely unscientific and amateurish discussion.