What is female ejaculate and where does it come from?

It neither smells nor tastes like urine from my experience. Doesn't mean some dont complement it with that.

Here is a link to a lengthy and rather dry presentation from the 13th World Congress of Sexology. The author presents and references articles by those who have concluded there isn't female ejaculate, and those who conclude the opposite. There are about equal numbers of each.

http://doctorg.com/site/female-ejacu...h-and-reality/

Based on biochemical analysis in which chemicals which are always found in urine are not found in ejaculate, and that substances found in prostatic secretions, but not urine, are found in female ejaculate, the authors conclude that almost all woman ejaculate a biochemically distinct liquid, in variable quantities (though the measured quantities of ejaculate are much less than Flower Tucci or a couple of women I have been with). To those who say there are only two liquids a woman secretes, urine, and lubrication from the Bartholin's glands, I can only conclude that you are being willfully ignorant of the science.

More difficult to understand are those women who produce very large amounts of fluid which they, and the men who have been with them, are convinced is not urine. I am definitely one of those men. I have experienced large volume ejaculations which is absolutely clearly not urine, sometimes very soon after urination. I don't know where that volume of fluid resides. Perhaps some combination of prodigious lubrication, female ejactulation, and the contractions of the pubococcygeus muscles expel this non-urinary fluid in big quantities. I don't know. But I have experienced it on several occasions. From these women at least, it is not urine. And it wouldn't matter to me if it was most likely--if it produces that much pleasure for my partner, then I love it.

As a cautionary tale to those who seem to think they know that female ejaculation is not possible--please remember that almost all erectile dysfunction was considered to be psychological in origin up to the mid 1990s, when we discovered that it is a very biochemical event, with biochemical cures for many men; I think those who think that we fully understand a woman's sexual apparatus will find some great surprises in the upcoming years, if they are willing to approach data with an open mind.

Thank you so very much for your measured and scientific approach to this rather galvanizing topic, s-i-n. While it would be wondrous indeed if the naysayers could be swayed by actual data and the experiences of those who have actually witnessed this event, there will always be people who insist on being willfully ignorant. To each their own, I suppose.

Regardless, just freaking drink it :-)

Regardless, just freaking drink it :-) Originally Posted by thirtyfour

But not with a straw, those edges frakking HURT.

Mouth funnel of course.

Interesting stuff. Thanks for the links.

I know a lot of men are really into the squirters/gushers. I’ve had quite a few of them, both professional and amateurs. First, let me say, I’m not into it. Way too messy for my taste. I’ll take a conventional orgasm any day. That being said, I’ve have been with five women that either squirted or gushed, and in each case it was a salty event. I have to agree with most doctors that it is a female incontinence orgasm.

I have never experienced the squirting but have have experienced I guess a type of gushing where the woman, after intercourse orgasm or digital g-spot stimulation orgasm, has described a feeling of additional fluid. One described it as a rush of lubrication. Lubrication is what it has felt and tasted like to me as well. In each case there was visible evidence of considerable fluid in the area under her that I wouldn't consider normal. Incontinence is one possibility, I guess. Women have been known to lose control of their bladders over other significant episodes such as laughter or fright.

The question that no one has asked to this point is "what purpose does it serve?"

Spice brought up the erectile dysfunction but I would argue that it isn't comparable. Erectile dysfunction is exactly that, dysfunction. Something isn't working the way it should and the reasons while numerous are explainable and in most cases treatable.

I don't think female ejaculation would be considered a dysfunction but what is it? All of our other sexual functions, erections, lubrication, male ejaculation, etc. serve a particular purpose and were either given to us by God or evolution(whichever you chose to believe). Even female orgasm serves the purpose of helping the sperm move upstream. So what possible purpose could female ejaculation serve?

Could it be a way of rejecting excessive sperm after a period of over stimulation when the body assumes that it has received enough to be fertilized and the last few undesirable mates are rejected by the body in this way. I don't know. It's just a thought but if you think about it there may be some sense in that.

What is female ejaculate and where does it come from?

It's urine and it comes from the bladder.


If you're a hobbysit and you're into it and it makes you feel better by all means call it female ejaculate.

If you're a provider and it happens naturally or it's part of your marketing scheme by all means call it squirting.

I've been peed on before and it doesn't always smell like urine.

For all of you believers take this test:

Soak up some of that "female ejaculate" or "squirt" with a washcloth. Then throw it in your car trunk, briefcase, or gym bag. Take it out the next day and put it up to your nose, take a big wiff, and come back and tell us all what it smells like.

It's urine. Always has been.

For a guy who claims to be such a fan of empirical evidence I'm not sure how you can believe otherwise.

Or do you think there's a magical, never-before-found organ in a woman's body that produces "ejaculate?"

It's not a mystery. Never has been.

Sigh. . . . .I'm a bit mystified why there are a handful of people who seem to be emotionally involved in denying the possibility of female ejaculate unless it is urine.

Linux, I think the empirical evidence cited by SF and I is pretty convincing, more so than the less empirical speculations typically cited by the deniers.

No "magic organ" required. There are already at least 2 organs known to produce non-urinary fluid in a woman's genital tract, Skene's Glands and Bartholin's Glands, the only question is that of volume, not whether such fluids exist.

There are lots of women who produce lubrication in such copious amounts that they gush and leave large wet spots on the bed. Is it such a stretch that some women might consciously or unconsciously contract the pelvic muscles in such a way that it comes out in a stream instead of a gush? Or would you deniers say that those women are just incontinent also???

Tell me again what is illogical or unscientific about coming to the conclusion that a fluid which doesn't smell, taste, or have the chemical composition of urine, is not urine??

And it doesn't really matter, if it's hot, it's hot, and I am one of those who do definitely find it hot. . . . . .and it is clearly intensely pleasurable for the ladies I have experienced it with. . . . . not guessing about whether these ladies have had Os or not.

Sigh. . . . .I'm a bit mystified why there are a handful of people who seem to be emotionally involved in denying the possibility of female ejaculate unless it is urine.

Linux, I think the empirical evidence cited by SF and I is pretty convincing, more so than the less empirical speculations typically cited by the deniers.

No "magic organ" required. There are already at least 2 organs known to produce non-urinary fluid in a woman's genital tract, Skene's Glands and Bartholin's Glands, the only question is that of volume, not whether such fluids exist.

There are lots of women who produce lubrication in such copious amounts that they gush and leave large wet spots on the bed. Is it such a stretch that some women might consciously or unconsciously contract the pelvic muscles in such a way that it comes out in a stream instead of a gush? Or would you deniers say that those women are just incontinent also???

Tell me again what is illogical or unscientific about coming to the conclusion that a fluid which doesn't smell, taste, or have the chemical composition of urine, is not urine??

And it doesn't really matter, if it's hot, it's hot, and I am one of those who do definitely find it hot. . . . . .and it is clearly intensely pleasurable for the ladies I have experienced it with. . . . . not guessing about whether these ladies have had Os or not. Originally Posted by spice-is-nice

Yes women secrete lubrication when aroused. The key is the low volume of it.

If you are so concivnced then why the need for two threads about it?

Yes women secrete lubrication when aroused. The key is the low volume of it. Originally Posted by oilfieldscum

Just because YOU'RE only able to get a woman minimally aroused...
I'm sorry, I had to do it, you left it wide open.

Arguing that female ejaculation is nothing but urine in the face of scientific evidence is like arguing the sky is red. Sometimes it is, but in most instances, it's not. Insisting that it is red despite actual evidence to the contrary makes you, and everyone who blindly agrees with you, look like an ignorant fool.

Personally I really don't know what to think it is. I also don't care. I've enjoyed being with squirters as well as non squirters and have absolutely no desire to try to force others to believe something whether it be with scientific proof or otherwise.

Why most of you do just beats the hell outta me. Let them believe whatever they want.