Miss Lennox,
I am hopeful that he didn't mean it that way.
I hope I didn't come across that way either. Being a service industry, there is a lot of room for making faux pas where the service and the person get all messed up together. Especially when conversing about the business/economics of the situation.
BTW, love the photo that you use.
Originally Posted by Jake2.1
Aww… thanks Jake.
Yeah, poor choice of words on my part. Should have been "someone"
Originally Posted by atlcomedy
Sometimes its hard to tell what men really think of women (especially the women in this industry). I didn't know if it was a Freudian slip or intentional.
I think objectification can go both ways. No man wants to feel like a wallet. No woman wants to feel like a walking orifice.
Diana has a really good point, "What are you REALLY paying for?" She had mentioned that some seasoned escorts are charging newbie BP/CL and SW rates. Different people provide different calibers of service BECAUSE not all men are looking for the same thing.
For example, most women have a certain hair dresser that they prefer. For me, I am not just looking for someone who can cut my hair efficiently. Her studio needs to be clean. She also needs to be cordial and engage in amiable conversation. I like it when she pours me a glass of wine while I sit under the dryer. Furthermore, she needs to have some type of artistic initiative (I want her to have fun with my hair; I don’t want the same color and cut every time.) I do not want her working on five other women while she is doing my hair. I want it to be about me. At the end of the day, my bill reflects this.
If I didn’t want all of these things, I would go to Wal-Mart and have the $9.99 special cut.
I realize that some men want the “all day beauty spa” type of escort, and others are looking to get the job done as quickly and cheaply as possible. If I am reading Diana’s post correctly, I too wonder how many men in Texas are looking for the Wal-Mart special.