Half-hour sessions

You guys should just get a Room.

(full hour of course) and just fantasy fuck your brains out)

(There is a lot of suppressed carnality here that should be addressed not ignored.)

Then for the encore (after the hour). , get into a "heated discussion" and do it all again (for an hour of course) next week.

Call me just another "silly ole bear". But it does sound hot! Originally Posted by harkontume

Nah my sig line says it all. I prefer young, beautiful and exotic women who are more interested in pleasing me sexually than a fake one hour relationship with a forced 15 minute intro of chatter.
Post-bcd pillow talk is great but pre-bcd is wasting my $$.

They don't claim to sell their bodies only because they want to make a positive difference in the world (Total crock). They don't publicly complain if the clock runs over by 10 as a result of them wasting 15 minutes of the clients time with unnecessary chitchat.

I just wondering if there would have been a "NICE" way of posting this?


Knuckle Draggers? Heh? As if I didn't have enough problems today?

I actually prefer HH sessions over hour appointments for several reasons. I'm a one trick pony and it saves me money. I take pride in being on time but more importantly know when to leave. I NEVER try to stay longer unless the provider initiates it. I'm drama free, freshly showered, nuts shaved and teeth brushed. If I'm paying $5.00 per minute, I wanna be spending it trying to bust a nut. If I wanted to chit chat about world events, I would go to the barbershop, feed store or Mom & Pop cafe where it's free. I have no dog in this fight but wanted to give you my 2 cents worth. Peace & Love to all

On my first appointment, I prefer to keep it between 2 1/2 minutes to 5 minutes with 3 minutes being perfect. But, hey, that's just me.... ;-)

NEWs break; dot dot dot dot GFE=10-15 mins of chat time

Providers are there to provide a service.

I can agree with the above statement - once in a while, in my hobbying career. Busting a nut is not the primary reason I hobby.

Almost always I am there for companionship, communication, chemistry and (yes, most times) copulation.

With the accent on the companionship.

My question:

If for the rest of your life you must give up one or the other, which would you give up?

Intimacy or sex.

And don't confuse the two as being inseparable.

Providers are there to provide a service.

I can agree with the above statement - once in a while, in my hobbying career. Busting a nut is not the primary reason I hobby.

Almost always I am there for companionship, communication, chemistry and (yes, most times) copulation.

With the accent on the companionship.

My question:

If for the rest of your life you must give up one or the other, which would you give up?

Intimacy or sex.

And don't confuse the two as being inseparable. Originally Posted by ck1942

I just don't buy the premise that it is one or the other.
That one cant feel chemistry, cant communicate and copulate in a 30 minute time frame.

Especially if it isn't just a One time thing.. what if you have a long time relationship where if not twice a month but at least once a month you came together?
What if this has been going on for YEARS?

What if you have a JOB and have things to do besides chat?

There are many reasons for 30 minute time frame which usually win out from my (Monger) view point.

1. I have a JOB and must attend to it.
2. I have SO that will CHAT with me all day.
3. I have some long term ATF's with whom I have chatted about all we can chat.
4. MSOG is not desired by me anymore.
5. French is my favorite tongue.
6. 30 min for first meeting is great in case the chemistry is NOT there. In case one starts thinking about the work piling up in the first ten minutes of the date.

It is also a matter of available discretionary funds.
If I only wanted to fantasy copulate once every 6 weeks then a $300 date would be fine.
Doesn't make me cheap. I put this hobby in priority as "Discretely Discretionary"

Any Provider can set any rules, services, time frames, screening etc .. that they want.
I have no advise for them.
Not my job.

I only suggest that personal attacks , name calling , suggestions of knuckle dragging because someone disagrees with ones premise is not the way to win hearts and minds. It is not the way to promote business relationships.
It is not the way to get ones point across.

... suggestions of knuckle dragging because someone disagrees with ones premise ... Originally Posted by harkontume

Well, sure, if in fact it was a "premise" being disagreed with. But the lady was stating her new Policy, with an explanation for the why behind it. Presumably to make the transition smoother for lady and customer alike.

Then dudes started telling her why she was wrong. And continued after she made it clear she wasn't wishing to debate the matter.

They acting not too bright if you ask me.

Well, sure, if in fact it was a "premise" being disagreed with. But the lady was stating her new Policy, with an explanation for the why behind it. Presumably to make the transition smoother for lady and customer alike.

Then dudes started telling her why she was wrong. And continued after she made it clear she wasn't wishing to debate the matter.

They acting not too bright if you ask me. Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

Posting policy changes in the provider ads forum alone would support your statement however

1) She also posted this in the Coed open forum which is an open discussion platform.

2) She went on to rant about guys pushing overtime which pissed her off.

Believing this is 100% her own doing because clients expect 30 minutes of what they paid for, I shared my opinion.
I was very explicit that I fully understood extending her minimum session length in most cases. I was also clear about my opinion as to her reasoning in this case and how it applies to us mongers.

If the above two points aren't invites for shared and opposing opinions then I don't know what is.

I believe that if all responses supported her complaint then she would still be posting responses in this thread now.

I'm sure you're not as dim as the rest of us but that just makes your insult come across as that much slower. Some might call it kissing ass. Not me. I would just say perhaps you didn't realize this was a discussion forum and any and all posts are an invite to both shared and opposing views.

Providers are there to provide a service.


My question:

If for the rest of your life you must give up one or the other, which would you give up?

Intimacy or sex.

And don't confuse the two as being inseparable. Originally Posted by ck1942

That is neither here nor there in regard to someone simply wanting and paying for 30 minutes of great BCD.
I agree with you that almost everyone would prefer intimacy in a "Rest of your life one or the other" scenario but that has zero to do with this subject matter.

That is suggesting the customer is misguided for primarily wanting sex during the time they paid for.

Providers are sex workers who can also provide fake intimacy. There is NO true intimacy with an alias persona who is hired by the hour whether 30 minutes or two hours.
Most mongers have all the intimacy they need from close family and friends.

In fact I feel sad for those seeking intimacy in the sex industry with a fake identity whose job is to make to you feel intimately connected.
Sex however is real. The sensual physical pleasure she gives you is real. You are actually getting that which you've paid for.

... I'm sure you're not as dim as the rest of us but that just makes your insult come across as that much slower. Originally Posted by Codybeast

Thank you for the compliment. I think. I don't do so well with mixed metaphors.

No insult intended. I was just replying to harks comment, which I thought misrepresented the gist of the disagreement.

And, sure, one can argue with the OP's original post all they want - this is Coed after all. But it's just pissin' in the wind is all. And we all know that's none too bright.

And, sure, one can argue with the OP's original post all they want - this is Coed after all. But it's just pissin' in the wind is all. And we all know that's none too bright. Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

Again it's not arguing to share opposing views. Threads generally take on a life of their own because of the subject matter rather than the OP's original intent.

I am not arguing with the OP at all. I have a specific opinion about the subject matter.

I could not care less if she raises her minimum session length. I've never met her and never will so it does not affect me in the least.

I do however find the topic quite interesting and worthy of sharing views even if that was not her intent. I believe as long we stay on topic this is not hijacking.

Pissing in the wind would indeed be arguing with her or trying to influence her decision. I am attempting to do neither. In fact she is completely out of the picture.

Coed isn't intended to be a bulletin board with a quick unopposed jab thrown in by the OP.

... I am not arguing with the OP at all.

I could not care less if she raises her minimum session length. I've never met her and never will so it does not affect me in the least.

Pissing in the wind would indeed be arguing with her or trying to influence her decision. I am attempting to do neither. In fact she is completely out of the picture. Originally Posted by Codybeast

Who you be kidding? I believe we will find evidence to the contrary, in your own words, below.

... I like you and if I ever do hobby you will be on my must-consider list ...

If that day ever comes please understand that I'll expect your clothes off pronto. We can talk a bit later "if there's time left over". If the full hour is consumed by passionate bcd I'm sure you wouldn't mind hanging out off the clock for the sake of getting to know me better. Of course I would neither demand nor expect that of you. Originally Posted by Codybeast

She is "completely out of the picture" because she called you a fool, based on this past post. And rightfully so. You went beyond arguing a point and into a hypothetical scenario involving the OP and she called you on it.

Oh, right, you were just kidding. The FG bowing defense. Well, you kidded poorly then. And as we all know, kidding poorly is foolish.

So back to my original point to hark: your opinion on session length is your opinion, the manner it's been expressed here is foolish.

So back to my original point to hark: your opinion on session length is your opinion, the manner it's been expressed here is foolish. Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

Really? Really?

Please do tell me what you are talking about.

Do you remember?

Please re read my post and tell me exactly what was foolish about it.

I was disagreeing with CK1942 premise that chemistry, intimacy etc ..etc.
could not be experienced in a 30 min session.

I did then state why I preferred 30 min sessions.

Why cant you be specific?
What is your point?

"your" = Cb. Talking to Cb here, no? Sorry if unclear.

And that was my original point to hark, yes? Dudes being foolish?

If'n the shoe don't fit ...