Why Hillary will obliterate Drumpf.

I B Hankering's Avatar
IBH, the Washington Post is fallacious? Post a link to backup your Bullshit or SHUT THE FUCK UP. That is how the game is played here. Even Jeb Bush said invading Iraq was a bad idea. You still think it was good idea, Fucking MORON. Originally Posted by flghtr65
No, flighty, you'd be the liar ignoring how Hildebeest ordered that the classification headings be stripped from the material before it was transmitted, flighty, and then you mendaciously parse words about "responsibility". Hildebeest was responsible, flighty; yet, you'd be the liar ignoring how it was Hildebeest's assigned responsibility to make sure every fucking employee in her department was complying with existing security protocols, flighty.
flghtr65's Avatar
Check out a real American... not a sissy like frigger65

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIdHNiYH0-4


This man thinks frigger65 is a puto... so do I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1p6XImLEac


This man thinks you are a white liberal sissy, frigger65 and I agree!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Uin_fwCkLE


I will spend all night posting these videos of TRUE AMERICANS and Crush your 0zombie Ass. Watch ME, frigger65


Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
Iffy, let's go over the first video. Your guy likes Trump because Trump will build a wall, lower taxes and Fix NAFTA.

I don't have a problem with building the wall on the southern border, even if the USA has to pay for it. The democrats and the republicans are both at fault for the illegal immigration problems that we have. I do not agree with Trump with on rounding up 12 million people and sending them back to Mexico. It is not practical. Even Bush43, as dumb as he was realized that it not practical to round up 12 million people and send them back. There has to be some sort of pathway to citizenship.

Second issue, lowering taxes. The Bush tax cut percentages of 2000 HAVE NOT CHANGED IN 15 YEARS in 6 of the 7 tax brackets. The tax percentage in the 7th tax bracket was changed from 36% to 39.6% in January 2013. This was the same percentage that Bill Clinton had it at in 1999 the last fiscal accounting year where there was a small surplus (Both Bush43 and Obama have running deficits ever since for different reasons). The tax rate percentages are not the problem. The government spends too much money. It spends more than it takes in.We should probably go back to the sequester. The rolling debt will never come down until the deficit becomes a surplus. The deficit right now is lowest it has been in eight years. However, we are still not in a surplus condition.

Third issue, NAFTA. I agree with Trump that China manipulates it currency, making it almost impossible for American companies to compete, thus the loss of manufacturing jobs. If you put a tariff of 35% on all goods from China that will mean that the 60 inch Sony high definition TV from China will cost $1350 instead of $1000 at the local Best Buy. This would not be good for average customer.

Last issue. Trump is a loose canon and will get USAinvolved in another costly ground war. We spent weigh too much with Invading Iraq. The only weapons they found were designed by and purchased from the USA.

Your guy did a pretty good job. They should invite him to republican convention. They could let hit sit in Mitt Romney's seat. Mitt is not going this year.
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
The 300K people in Kentucky was just an example. There are 10 million citizens who are receiving the expanded Medicaid in the 26 states that accepted it. There are another 10 million plus who got a private insurance plan on the government exchanges. So, that is 20 million more citizens insured because the ACA law was passed. It's not just 300k in Kentucky. So FUCK YOU COF. Originally Posted by flghtr65
And ALL of their premiums are SKYROCKETING! Their co-pays are unaffordable. Payments to doctors require more and more paperwork. Health care costs are INCREASING, quality is DECREASING. Actual health care is becoming too expensive even on the exchanges due to high co-pays and coinsurance. Doctors and insurance companies are leaving the system. Obamacare does not need to be repealed, it will fall under its own weight. It is an unmitigated disaster, sold as a lie, by a liar. You are unbelievably stupid, Fluffy.
flghtr65's Avatar
And ALL of their premiums are SKYROCKETING! Their co-pays are unaffordable. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
That is in the states where the risk pools are not balanced. The family of 4 that makes $40,000 is getting a large subsidy to make it affordable MORON. Do you think the health insurance companies are going to be able to sell policies to high risk people who are already sick for free? United Health Care left, BCBS isn't going anywhere.

You argue to put all the uninsured on Medicaid? Do you realize how many doctors do not accept Medicaid patients? Putting 40 million people on Medicaid will not work.

If you do what Bernie Sanders wants to do (Single Payer for everyone) how much will that cost 20 Trillion? That is a lot more than what the ACA cost. With the ACA being passed 90% of all citizens under age 65 are covered. This would be a higher percentage, but 22 states did not accept the expanded Medicaid.

The old system before the ACA was not working. You had 40 million people with no health insurance, many of them who are employed.
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
You have no data to back that up Fluffy.
flghtr65's Avatar
You have no data to back that up Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Back what up MORAN? Can you be just a little more specific? What do you want me to give you data for?
LexusLover's Avatar
There are 10 million citizens who are receiving the expanded Medicaid in the 26 states that accepted it. Originally Posted by flghtr65
Do you realize how many doctors do not accept Medicaid patients? Putting 40 million people on Medicaid will not work. Originally Posted by flghtr65
Here's your sign!!!!
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Your sign, redneck, is "No Spitting."
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
Back what up MORAN? Can you be just a little more specific? What do you want me to give you data for? Originally Posted by flghtr65
MORAN? Seriously? Oh the irony! You are truly an idiot. Moron!


Your sign, redneck, is "No Spitting." Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
And YOUR sign is : Austin's Gloryhole Guru here, first blow for free !! Bukakke and fudge packing available !
lustylad's Avatar
Regarding your question. The BURDEN does not change because of how sensitive the information is. You can dream up any hypothetical you want, the BURDEN is on the sender not the recipient. It is a State Department rule. If you don't like their rule take it up the State Department.

Did you read your own link, flighty? By the Washington Post's own count, hildebeest was the SENDER for 104 emails that were designated as classified by a State Dept. review process. Why didn't she recognize their sensitivity when she sent them? You just told me the BURDEN was on her. She clearly failed to exercise proper discretion and label and safeguard the sensitive information she was SENDING out using an illegal and shockingly vulnerable private server. So even by your own incredibly narrow standards of wrongdoing, she FAILED!


Hillary made a public statement that she did not send or receive emails that were labeled CLASSIFIED. So far this has been proven to be a true statement. The State Department changed the classification of some of the emails to CLASSIFIED months after they were originally sent.

You claimed that ALL of the 52,000 pages of emails found on hildebeest's illegal private server were clearly labeled “UNCLASSIFIED” at the time they were sent. I called bullshit on that. Having no label is not the same as having a clearly stamped “UNCLASSIFIED” label. ALL of the emails means every single one of them. Show me a link for your claim or else admit you made it up.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...clinton-email/ Originally Posted by flghtr65

This is all mere deflection on your part. You still haven't answered my two questions:

1. Are you seriously suggesting those 22 SAP emails found on the hildebeest's private server were erroneously marked UNCLASSIFIED?

2. Let's assume a US Secretary of State receives an email containing satellite photos of a North Korean nuclear weapons site.... do you think a prudent, competent, and security-minded Secretary of State just might be expected to recognize this as extremely sensitive regardless of its classification label?


Let's get real, flighty. A competent Secretary of State would have blown his/her stack and severely reprimanded his/her subordinates if they failed to properly label and safeguard the nation's secrets in their email communications. Hillary Clinton set up an illegal, inexcusably vulnerable private server from Day 1. Her example to her subordinates from Day 1 was - it's ok to be reckless and negligent (and utterly transparent to our foes) when conducting the nation's diplomacy.
flghtr65's Avatar
Here's your sign!!!! Originally Posted by LexusLover
LL, in case you lost track of the posts, putting 40 million people on Medicaid was COF's idea not mine. Secondly, you still confuse private insurance sold on the government exchanges with Medicaid. The two are totally different, in your mind you continue to think they are same. The ACA is in year 3 now. LL the private insurance that BCBS and Aetna sell on government exchanges is REAL health insurance. Wake up LL you can't be that SLOW.
flghtr65's Avatar
Seriously? Oh the irony! Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
I am not the first person on here to have a typo. Go fluff your hero Ron Paul and then go Fuck yourself FLUFFY.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
LL, in case you lost track of the posts, putting 40 million people on Medicaid was COF's idea not mine. Secondly, you still confuse private insurance sold on the government exchanges with Medicaid. The two are totally different, in your mind you continue to think they are same. The ACA is in year 3 now. LL the private insurance that BCBS and Aetna sell on government exchanges is REAL health insurance. Wake up LL you can't be that SLOW. Originally Posted by flghtr65
who is this COF you speak of? don't know who you are talking about. dick.



I am not the first person on here to have a typo. Go fluff your hero Ron Paul and then go Fuck yourself FLUFFY. Originally Posted by flghtr65
you are fluffer on a gay porn site! are you ashamed? you should be you dick sucker!

now go suck 100 gay cocks and say 1,000 "Hail Mary's" and pray for salvation.

said the atheist.

ahahahahahaha

you have no point of view except the "Neil and Bob" point of view. or is that what you do?