And you "KNOW" this based on a posting on a hooker board by a hooker?
Thanks for posting a reference to an unsubstantiated claim that will encourage hookers to record sessions believing that the DA will drop criminal charges if a recording is produced. I "assume" you're ok with being recorded, if you happen one day to have a session, just so the hooker will feel "safe" from you.
Were you also the one who advised them to put a disclaimer in their ads?
Originally Posted by LexusLover
I know this because I can read ....you should try it sometime
http://www.chron.com/news/article/Vi...ng-1706763.php
Originally Posted by WTF
Sorry, you read it in a newpaper account. I "always" base my knowledge about LE activities and screw ups" in the media to get the straight "poop"!
Back to the "issue"
"Thanks for posting a reference to an unsubstantiated claim that will encourage hookers to record sessions believing that the DA will drop criminal charges if a recording is produced. I "assume" you're ok with being recorded, if you happen one day to have a session, just so the hooker will feel "safe" from you."
Did you also read in the media that BBBJ's are just as risky as BBFS?
You're on a roll.
If you can justify a "provider" recording a session for safety, then a "hobbyist" should be able to justify recording a session for safety. My vote is NEITHER RECORD UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES without specific permission to do so .... at the beginning of the recording with a date and time check in the permission segment.