Ketanji Brown Jackson

"I do not hold a position on whether individuals possess natural rights," the jurist wrote in response to a written question from Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas.

Jackson pointed to the Declaration of Independence when she was asked to, "explain, in your own words, the theory prevalent among members of the Founding Fathers’ generation that humans possess natural rights that are inherent or inalienable."

Jackson wrote that, "The theory that humans possess inherent or inalienable rights is reflected in the Declaration of Independence, which states: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.'"


Regarding Jackson's lack of a position about the issue of whether individuals have natural rights, GOP Rep. Mike Johnson of Louisiana tweeted, "Ketanji Brown Jackson denies the first, self-evident truth of America!"

Time will tell. The environment in which she will be working may temper her attitude and perception to a less liberal point of view. Hopefully, unlike Sotomayer recently, she will be factually honest in her presentations on the bench.

https://www.eccie.net/member.php?u=1...=eccie_reviews

46 crimes and you want to lecture me? Are you a "practicing" criminal?

I've yet to see a traffic code that suspends stop signs based on the hours of the day.

Like said: Who is "practicing" law on here?

Get a life, junior. You're out of your league. A criminal lecturing about "ethics"!!!!

You're a joke! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Discretion is the power of officials to act according to the dictates of their own judgment and conscience. Discretion is abused when the judicial action is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable.

Stops signs and whoring - right.

The joke here is you expect respect.

P.S.

I don't mind being called a joke.

Listen to a Young Johnny Carson Explain Humor Writing


https://www.vulture.com/2012/09/list...r-writing.html

For his senior thesis at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Johnny Carson created an audio program that explained how to write comedy for radio. You can listen to the 45 minute thesis here. (Ignore the first completely unintelligible minute or so.)

https://www.eccie.net/member.php?u=1...=eccie_reviews

46 crimes and you want to lecture me? Are you a "practicing" criminal?

I've yet to see a traffic code that suspends stop signs based on the hours of the day.

Like said: Who is "practicing" law on here?

Get a life, junior. You're out of your league. A criminal lecturing about "ethics"!!!!

You're a joke! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Short memory? Actually, as I said...the Joke is YOU!

YOU struggling for "respect" on a hooker board!!!!!!!!!!

Is that why you brag about committing crimes ... for "respect"?

Enjoy your delusion, junior!

Those four letter words seem to challenge you ...



GED?

Short memory? Actually, as I said...the Joke is YOU!

YOU struggling for "respect" on a hooker board!!!!!!!!!!

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Short-term memory you say? I could make a chemistry joke of that, but I digress.

You think I want respect?

...

Those four letter words seem to challenge you ...

GED? Originally Posted by LexusLover

So, you didn't get a GED. That's ok. Every movie critic I ever heard hadn't made a movie ... so that would be you! No legal education. No law license. No experience "practicing" law. 46 crimes confessed ... and you're an Ethics Professor!!!!

Go figure. Or you can "STOP"!

But no wonder you think Bitten did a good job of picking a SCOTUS Justice!!! You're an Ethics Professor!!!!!!

lexuslover, are you talking to yourself to your quotes ???

lexuslover, are you talking to yourself to your quotes ??? Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

No, but considering the poster to whom I am addressing my comments I might as well be doing so. That's why grade schoolers get coloring books and later books with lots of pictures in them.

Today I guess they'll be getting picture books showing why there's no difference between males and females ... and the new Black Female SCOTUS Justice will uphold them as "educational"!

let's give a SNICK Quack award to the radical left for their accomplishment by replacing a moderate white male liberal with a flaming woke black female racist woefully short on appellate court experience who thinks she's a man because she can't define "Female" just because black female. brilliant.



SNICK Quack

You would think that it would get everybody's attention when a Supreme Court Justice(now), says the she has no opinion on one of the very foundational truths that makes America what it is.

You would think that it would get everybody's attention when a Supreme Court Justice(now), says the she has no opinion on one of the very foundational truths that makes America what it is. Originally Posted by Jackie S

If "she" were a White male, it might. Especially, if "she" chased pussy and drank beer while in school.

SNICK SNOOK SNOCK!

SNICK SNOOK SNOCK!

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Fart, belch, sneeze, cough, wheeze, burp.

You Qanon Rightists never stopped to think about Jackson's response to the ''define Woman'' question. I don't think you're smart enough, really.

No matter what Jackson said, it would be ''wrong'' to the Right. It was a gotcha-designed question. Jackson didn't take the bait, but y'all hopped on her like ''oh, we got her''! Only the hardcore Right felt the glee from her response.

You Qanon Rightists never stopped to think about Jackson's response to the ''define Woman'' question. I don't think you're smart enough, really.

No matter what Jackson said, it would be ''wrong'' to the Right. It was a gotcha-designed question. Jackson didn't take the bait, but y'all hopped on her like ''oh, we got her''! Only the hardcore Right felt the glee from her response. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

her reply was nothing. evasive on purpose. this concerns you not, why? maybe you should put the Chung tool in her non-vagina and make her have a woke O. think she'll realize she's a biological woman then?