The Mueller report

dilbert firestorm's Avatar
There is a real possibility that impeaching Trump could blow up in the Democrat's feces.

can't wait to see who's right. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

FTFY
Jaxson66's Avatar
The parts that Team Mueller edited out more than indicate the bias of Team Mueller and their intent to smear Trump. Mueller's bullshit is simply hildebeest's bullshit rewarmed for hildebeest minion's to suckle on and swallow. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Don’t forget collusion isn’t a crime and proving conspiracy with that lame ass theory is ridiculous. Nunes needed a distraction to divert the Cult 45 members away from the fact the DOJ refused a court order.

In the immortal words of the self proclaimed stable genius “ we’ll see what happens “
I B Hankering's Avatar
Don’t forget collusion isn’t a crime and proving conspiracy with that lame ass theory is ridiculous. Nunes needed a distraction to divert the Cult 45 members away from the fact the DOJ refused a court order.

In the immortal words of the self proclaimed stable genius “ we’ll see what happens “
Originally Posted by Jaxson66
It's hildebeest's dim-retard minions that are being distracted away from the facts -- it's been that way since 2016.

Where's Adam Shitty's ~proof~? But after two years of his lies, you still believe in him.
Jaxson66's Avatar
What about the republican congressman from Michigan? He doesn't mean anything either, right? Why does Pelosi want to hear from Maghan? Are you afraid to hear about that "Stupid Sh*t" that Trump requested him to do?

There is a real possibility that Trump could be impeached. Originally Posted by adav8s28
A Republican group is hand-delivering special counsel Robert Mueller's report to every lawmaker in its party on the heels of his first public remarks on the two-year Russia investigation.

Republicans for the Rule of Law announced Thursday it will deliver a copy of the report with highlighted sections to Republicans in Congress.
adav8s28's Avatar
Amash is as much as a Republican as Bernie Sanders is a Democrat. So it won’t happen. Originally Posted by bambino
You probably meant to write independent instead of democrat. Bernie is on the same page as AOC with their views on healthcare and "free college".

If impeachment is "off the table" then why bother with bringing in Maghan? Maghan is just one of the ten examples of obstruction in the report. If Trump has nothing to worry about with Maghan, then why won't Trump let him testify?

They may want to prove at least a couple of those examples, instead of just one. If they can impeachment just might happen.

You like to predict outcomes. Did you predict that Obama was going to beat Romney by 5 million votes?

Political consultant Dick Weiss of didn't so Fox fired him along with Sarah airhead Palin.
LexusLover's Avatar
...If Trump has nothing to worry about with Maghan, then why won't Trump let him testify? ... Originally Posted by adav8s28
Hold that thought until you get accused of something you didn't do!
bambino's Avatar
You probably meant to write independent instead of democrat. Bernie is on the same page as AOC with their views on healthcare and "free college".

If impeachment is "off the table" then why bother with bringing in Maghan? Maghan is just one of the ten examples of obstruction in the report. If Trump has nothing to worry about with Maghan, then why won't Trump let him testify?

They may want to prove at least a couple of those examples, instead of just one. If they can impeachment just might happen.

You like to predict outcomes. Did you predict that Obama was going to beat Romney by 5 million votes?

Political consultant Dick Weiss of didn't so Fox fired him along with Sarah airhead Palin. Originally Posted by adav8s28
In case you haven’t noticed, Sanders is running again as a DEMOCRAT, not an Independent. Amash has said he wouldn’t stand a chance of winning his district as an Independent. Now the he outed himself, I doubt he will win again. Magahn testified for 30 hours to Mueller. It’s in the report. The DOJ ruled no obstruction. As a legal matter, case closed.
LexusLover's Avatar
The DOJ ruled no obstruction. As a legal matter, case closed. Originally Posted by bambino
Isn't that what Comey did right before the 2016 election re HillariousNoMore?

Perhaps I should have written .... "tried to do" instead of "did"!
Jaxson66's Avatar
As I recall the Orange one was pissing and moaning Fake News

Volume 2/ pg 118
The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel

Overview
In late January 2018, the media reported that in June 2017 the President had ordered McGahn to have the Special Counsel fired based on purported conflicts of interest but McGahn had refused, saying he would quit instead. After the story broke, the President, through his personal counsel and two aides, sought to have McGahn deny that he had been directed to remove the Special Counsel. Each time he was approached, McGahn responded that he would not refute the press accounts because they were accurate in reporting on the President's effort to have the Special Counsel removed. The President later personally met with McGahn in the Oval Office with only the ChiefofStaffpresent and tried to get McGahn to say that the President never ordered him to fire the Special Counsel. McGahn refused and insisted his memory of the President's direction to remove the Special Counsel was accurate. In that same meeting, the President challenged McGahn for taking notes of his discussions with the President and asked why he had told Special Counsel investigators that he had been directed to have the Special Counsel removed.
I B Hankering's Avatar
"Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I [AG Barr] have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense."

(NYT)
eccieuser9500's Avatar
What Two Crucial Words in the Constitution Actually Mean


https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...n-much/590461/






https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YIRQ6b52rs



The historical record categorically refutes the idea that the American revolutionaries gave their new president an unspecified array of royal prerogatives. To the contrary, the presidency that leaps off the pages of the Founders’ debates, diaries, speeches, letters, poems, and essays was an instrument of the law of the land, subject to the law of the land, and both morally (?) and legally obliged to obey the law of the land.
















Dershowitz to prove we have a kaiser?
eccieuser9500's Avatar
Redhot1960's Avatar
Originally Posted by gfejunkie
best post!

Jaxson66's Avatar











Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
They speak of trump’s attempt to have Maghan create a false document and Combover Caligula also instructed Prebius to have KT McFarland do the same.
KT McFarland refused to do so.

When CNN and others where reporting the story trump was screaming “ Fake News.
Hotrod511's Avatar
As I recall the Orange one was pissing and moaning Fake News

Volume 2/ pg 118
The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel

Overview
In late January 2018, the media reported that in June 2017 the President had ordered McGahn to have the Special Counsel fired based on purported conflicts of interest but McGahn had refused, saying he would quit instead. After the story broke, the President, through his personal counsel and two aides, sought to have McGahn deny that he had been directed to remove the Special Counsel. Each time he was approached, McGahn responded that he would not refute the press accounts because they were accurate in reporting on the President's effort to have the Special Counsel removed. The President later personally met with McGahn in the Oval Office with only the ChiefofStaffpresent and tried to get McGahn to say that the President never ordered him to fire the Special Counsel. McGahn refused and insisted his memory of the President's direction to remove the Special Counsel was accurate. In that same meeting, the President challenged McGahn for taking notes of his discussions with the President and asked why he had told Special Counsel investigators that he had been directed to have the Special Counsel removed. Originally Posted by Jaxson66
This seems to be all you are doing