Rewrite much history?
I like that part where you say that no SENATOR contested the results of the electoral college. That part takes place in the HOUSE and not the senate. You lied through misdirection.
I'll admit that Hillary (that's her name, you know) may have admitted once or twice as a sidebar that Trump won but when it came to major interviews (where it really counts) ... she didn't admit that Trump won and she still hasn't consistently admitted that she lost.
There was ... what are they calling it now? Insurrection? Riot? Protest? on January 6th to "overturn the results" of an election. Think about it (I know it hurts to do it.) how can that overturn the results? It can't but what it does do (if we had a fair media) highlight the fact of unanswered voter irregularities in six different states that have yet to be fully investigated (on January 6th). The courts had turned down every motion on frivolous grounds. There were no completed audits. No election board could explain the irregularities. Dominion was unavailable for comment.
And lets talk about storming the castle, for four years after Trump won in 2016, the followers of Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Crime Family did everything they could short of trying to kill Trump to overturn the election. Impeachment...twice! Russia, Russia, Russia...complete criminal hoax! Friends of Trump arrested on bogus charges or charges unrelated to the election...with armed FBI agents needed to bring in a 70 year old man at 6 AM.
No, you can't rewrite history and remove the stain on this nation left there by the left and Hillary Clinton.
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn
Oh johnnie. Pay attention in civics class much?
The fact that a senator did not object to the electoral college results in 2016 is significant because if at least one had, Congress would have required to adjourn to their respective chambers for debate and a vote on the subject. That did not happen in 2016 so Congress stayed in their joint session, debate was not allowed and the electoral college results were certified relatively quickly.
At least 1 member of each house of Congress challenged the certification of the results of Arizona in 2020, thus causing the joint session to be closed, both houses adjourned to their respective chambers for debate and a vote on the subject. This was a time consuming process and if not for the actions of your "highlighters of unanswered voter irregularities" probably would have repeated itself for each one of the other 5 states that are still in debate. This would have turned the election certification into an extremely long process.
Think about what you are about to post and make sure it is accurate before doing so next time. No matter how much it hurts you to do so.
I will not bother to address the remainder of your comments because it would not be worth the time and effort required. You would just dismiss them "on frivolous grounds" anyway. Or make another completely off the mark accusation that I was trying to "rewrite history."