just when you think you've seen it all on eccie

Champagne Brown's Avatar
And how do I block this fuctard and the one above?

There no reason talk anymore..
Wakeup's Avatar
We anxiously await your cease and desist order...
Champagne Brown's Avatar
Yay it worked! Can't see..
Wakeup's Avatar
Somehow I doubt she realizes what that means for her...
JustMeCLTXGG's Avatar
.............................. ..............
Another tidbit for you who rail about the rules:

If you bring facets of your life up on this SHMB, you open the door and give permission for it to be discussed... forever. One of the rules pertains to medical info. You cannot say "John has herpes. I saw the bumps around his mouth." It gets stricken from the record and you will receive points. If John says, "Hey, I have bumps around my mouth, I think I may have herpes" then he has opened the door not only for conversation on the subject, but for others to post now and a year from now that "How's that herpes going for ya, John?" or "Did you go to the Doctor and get some medicine for your herps?" without any repercussion whatsoever.

#16 - Posting about/Speculating about another person's medical condition is strictly forbidden. If a member encounters a medical issue and would like to get feedback from others or share it with the community, this would be allowed, but under no circumstances is a member to discuss or state anything about another member in this regard, unless it is in response to a question posed by THAT member.

.............................. .............................. ......... Originally Posted by Hottentot Venus
think you're cherry picking how to read that guideline. in my opinion it can be read a different way.

a year from now in the same thread sure but doesn't seem like it was meant to suggest a year from now whoever can go start their own thread on whoever for the hell of it.

of course I have no idea if the mods cherry pick how to read the rule or go back the exact wording used though from past examples maybe your cherry picking is the way to go.

And how do I block this fuctard and the one above?

There no reason talk anymore.. Originally Posted by Champagne Brown
http://www.eccie.net/profile.php?do=ignorelist

(nevermind)
think you're cherry picking how to read that guideline. in my opinion it can be read a different way.

a year from now in the same thread sure but doesn't seem like it was meant to suggest a year from now whoever can go start their own thread on whoever for the hell of it.

of course I have no idea if the mods cherry pick how to read the rule or go back the exact wording used though from past examples maybe your cherry picking is the way to go.



http://www.eccie.net/profile.php?do=ignorelist

(nevermind) Originally Posted by JustMeCLTXGG
Your trying to hard
dearhunter's Avatar
I guess that Wednesday meeting is not necessary after all.

A supreme directive against a fucktard to protect a hooktard who outed him twice would have been fucking awesome.
JustMeCLTXGG's Avatar
Your trying to hard Originally Posted by Dorthy_Monroe
it aint trying to state an opinion. nothing hard about stating an opinion.

thought it was clear I read the guidelines wording differently
think you're cherry picking how to read that guideline. in my opinion it can be read a different way.

a year from now in the same thread sure but doesn't seem like it was meant to suggest a year from now whoever can go start their own thread on whoever for the hell of it.

of course I have no idea if the mods cherry pick how to read the rule or go back the exact wording used though from past examples maybe your cherry picking is the way to go.

(nevermind) Originally Posted by JustMeCLTXGG
It doesn't mean to suggest anything, it says what it says... I said a year as an example, but hell, it could be more. If you open up a discussion on it, it's open for discussion.
Wakeup's Avatar
You know, my Supreme Directive isn't really doing anything right now, so I guess I'm due for another one, right? That begs the question though...what would it be called?
I guess that Wednesday meeting is not necessary after all.

A supreme directive against a fucktard to protect a hooktard who outed him twice would have been fucking awesome. Originally Posted by dearhunter
You did not read the Memo...

That was Canx 3 weeks ago... Shit... Look at the fax machine...
chicagoboy's Avatar
"Stop! in the name of love" is my favorite Supremes directive.
I fucking hate hate hate Diana Ross, bony bug eyed bitch.
I fucking hate hate hate Diana Ross, bony bug eyed bitch. Originally Posted by Hottentot Venus
Lmfao
junglemonkey's Avatar
Hahahahahaha