Dead candidate walking...

+1



. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

IBH, this is from your New York times link. Did you see this? Or did you choose to skip over it?

Mrs. Clinton has said that her emails contained no information that was marked classified — having classified information outside a secure government account is illegal — and that she is fully cooperating with an F.B.I. investigation to determine who at the State Department may have passed highly classified information from secure networks to her personal account. She herself is not a target of the investigation.

I have posted before that Hillary is NOT a target of the investigation and EX-CEO said I was crazy. Is the New York times crazy? The FBI is trying to figure who in the State Department may have passed Hillary classified information from a SECURE NETWORK to her personal account.

Like I posted before, it has not been proven that Hillary IS GUILTY of Violating regulations 18 UFC 1924 or UFC 793.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/08/us...mail.html?_r=0

IBH, this is from your New York times link. Did you see this? Or did you choose to skip over it?

Mrs. Clinton has said that her emails contained no information that was marked classified — having classified information outside a secure government account is illegal — and that she is fully cooperating with an F.B.I. investigation to determine who at the State Department may have passed highly classified information from secure networks to her personal account. She herself is not a target of the investigation.

I have posted before that Hillary is NOT a target of the investigation and EX-CEO said I was crazy. Is the New York times crazy? The FBI is trying to figure who in the State Department may have passed Hillary classified information from a SECURE NETWORK to her personal account.

Like I posted before, it has not been proven that Hillary IS GUILTY of Violating regulations 18 UFC 1924 or UFC 793.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/08/us...mail.html?_r=0 Originally Posted by flghtr65

Then why is she apologizing.

If Hillary is too stupid to recognize classified information without a label, she is too stupid to be President. She's one of the "deciders" whether or not something is classified. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

There's the Clinton's.... then the REST of us when to comes to obeying the LAW. Just ask Slick Willy OR Shrillary !

IBH, this is from your New York times link. Did you see this? Or did you choose to skip over it?

Mrs. Clinton has said that her emails contained no information that was marked classified — having classified information outside a secure government account is illegal — and that she is fully cooperating with an F.B.I. investigation to determine who at the State Department may have passed highly classified information from secure networks to her personal account. She herself is not a target of the investigation.

I have posted before that Hillary is NOT a target of the investigation and EX-CEO said I was crazy. Is the New York times crazy? The FBI is trying to figure who in the State Department may have passed Hillary classified information from a SECURE NETWORK to her personal account.

Like I posted before, it has not been proven that Hillary IS GUILTY of Violating regulations 18 UFC 1924 or UFC 793.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/08/us...mail.html?_r=0 Originally Posted by flghtr65

Hildabeast is guilt of mishandling classified government documents, and you're guilty of being stupid, flighty. Your POS POTUS, Odumbo, put it out in writing that “'Top Secret' was information that if disclosed could 'reasonably' be expected to cause “exceptionally grave damage to national security,'" flighty. Notice how Odumbo didn't mention "markings", flighty, but he did remark on Hildabeast's competency.

Hildabeast is guilt of mishandling classified government documents, and you're guilty of being stupid, flighty. Your POS POTUS, Odumbo, put it out in writing that “'Top Secret' was information that if disclosed could 'reasonably' be expected to cause “exceptionally grave damage to national security,'" flighty. Notice how Odumbo didn't mention "markings", flighty, but he did remark on Hildabeast's competency. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Is guilt?

Hildabeast is guilt of mishandling classified government documents, Originally Posted by I B Hankering

From post #376 which has your link from the New York times.

Is the New York times crazy? The FBI is trying to figure who in the State Department may have passed Hillary classified information from a SECURE NETWORK to her personal account.

The person/persons who passed information from a SECURE NETWORK to Hillary's personal account are the people who could be in trouble. If the FBI finds out who, they will probably have their security clearance revoked.

The BURDEN is on the sender not the receiving person. Old-T is STILL looking for a link to prove otherwise.

According to the New York times, Hillary is not being investigated, which means she is not going to be indicted. You can take this up with the New York times.

You can talk about "Born Classified" all you want, The STATE Department has disputed what Reuters said. This was in a link several posts ago.

"The person/persons who passed information from a SECURE NEWTWORK to Hillary's personal account are the people who could be in trouble. If the FBI finds out who, they will probably have their security clearance revoked."
"

Did you bother to read what you just wrote? Someone could lose their security clearance....really? Is that all you mind can think of? How about jail? Seeing Hillary in ill fitting orange coveralls with a little tear drop tattoo on her cheek would go a long way into helping this country (laughter is always the best medicine).

The fact is that like kiddie porn, no one cares how you got it. If you have it then you've broken the law. It is part of the investigation to find out where it came from but they got you by the shorts ones.

Word is out that some senior advisors are talking about a "deal" to keep Hillary out of prison. Short circuit the investigation by just going away.

I thought it was pretty funny how you tried to involve Gringrich in Hillary's problems....Newtwork Lmao.

"The person/persons who passed information from a SECURE NEWTWORK to Hillary's personal account are the people who could be in trouble. If the FBI finds out who, they will probably have their security clearance revoked."
"

Did you bother to read what you just wrote? Someone could lose their security clearance....really? Is that all you mind can think of? How about jail? Seeing Hillary in ill fitting orange coveralls with a little tear drop tattoo on her cheek would go a long way into helping this country (laughter is always the best medicine).

The fact is that like kiddie porn, no one cares how you got it. If you have it then you've broken the law. It is part of the investigation to find out where it came from but they got you by the shorts ones.

Word is out that some senior advisors are talking about a "deal" to keep Hillary out of prison. Short circuit the investigation by just going away.

I thought it was pretty funny how you tried to involve Gringrich in Hillary's problems....Newtwork Lmao. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

It's not like the forbidden content you mention, at all. It does matter that they were sent to her.

"

Did you bother to read what you just wrote? Someone could lose their security clearance....really? Is that all you mind can think of? How about jail? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

No one is going to jail. Did you click on the link that IBH provided? From the FBI link in his post.

To track how the information flowed, agents will try to gain access to the email accounts of many State Department officials who worked there while Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state, the officials said. State Department employees apparently circulated the emails on unclassified systems in 2009 and 2011, and some were ultimately forwarded to Mrs. Clinton.
They were not marked as classified, the State Department has said, and it is unclear whether its employees knew the origin of the information.
Continue reading the main story

No one is going to jail. Did you click on the link that IBH provided? From the FBI link in his post.

To track how the information flowed, agents will try to gain access to the email accounts of many State Department officials who worked there while Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state, the officials said. State Department employees apparently circulated the emails on unclassified systems in 2009 and 2011, and some were ultimately forwarded to Mrs. Clinton.
They were not marked as classified, the State Department has said, and it is unclear whether its employees knew the origin of the information.
Continue reading the main story Originally Posted by flghtr65

Then why apologize?

.

Then why apologize? Originally Posted by dirty dog

The answer to your question, POLITICS. Her campaign team does not want her poll numbers to drop any further. If you were thought an indictment was pending, would you go on the Ellen DeGeneres television show? Or would be with your lawyer talking to the people who are investigating you?

Take a look at the Sept 6th edition of the New York Times, her campaign team is already counting delegates from the future Super Tuesday primary elections. They don't seem to be worried about an indictment.

Why did JEB announce 2 months ago that he would not have invaded Iraq, knowing what we know now. The same answer, POLITICS.

The answer to your question, POLITICS. Her campaign team does not want her poll numbers to drop any further... Originally Posted by flghtr65

You just admitted her "apology" is completely insincere. You also implied that Hildabeast and her campaign team think Americans are too stupid to see it as insincere, otherwise they wouldn't expect it to help her poll numbers... So you recognize what a lying, cynical, contemptuous bitch she is. Think about that, flighty.

.

You just admitted her "apology" is completely insincere. You also implied that Hildabeast and her campaign team think Americans are too stupid to see it as insincere, otherwise they wouldn't expect it to help her poll numbers... So you recognize what a lying, cynical, contemptuous bitch she is. Think about that, flighty.

. Originally Posted by lustylad

You don't seem to understand that most everything politicians do contains a level of insincerity. It's not an admission of anything, it's an understanding of facts. Trump proves that Americans are stupid every time he talks, so what? I recognize what an enormous dumbass you are. Think about that, shitbird.