Oh johnnie. Pay attention in civics class much?I went fishing and hooked something. Usually I don't get anything other than an old boot but in this case I found that you know more than you let on. Everyone else accepted what I said but not you. I'll put this information away someplace. Another teacher (law)? A lawyer (constitutional law)? A masters in political science?
The fact that a senator did not object to the electoral college results in 2016 is significant because if at least one had, Congress would have required to adjourn to their respective chambers for debate and a vote on the subject. That did not happen in 2016 so Congress stayed in their joint session, debate was not allowed and the electoral college results were certified relatively quickly.
At least 1 member of each house of Congress challenged the certification of the results of Arizona in 2020, thus causing the joint session to be closed, both houses adjourned to their respective chambers for debate and a vote on the subject. This was a time consuming process and if not for the actions of your "highlighters of unanswered voter irregularities" probably would have repeated itself for each one of the other 5 states that are still in debate. This would have turned the election certification into an extremely long process.
Think about what you are about to post and make sure it is accurate before doing so next time. No matter how much it hurts you to do so.
I will not bother to address the remainder of your comments because it would not be worth the time and effort required. You would just dismiss them "on frivolous grounds" anyway. Or make another completely off the mark accusation that I was trying to "rewrite history." Originally Posted by Jam3768
I won't count the reticence of the politicians as a screaming verification of the electoral vote. How many people know something at a wedding when the question is asked, "if anyone has any reason why these two should not be wed, let them speak now or forever hold their peace". No ever does. Same thing for those politicians. You know something, you think you know something, face it, there is not a lot of courage in the House or Senate. Originally Posted by the_real_BarleycornMost of them are bought and paid for. Just like the Nevada senator from The Godfather.
I went fishing and hooked something. Usually I don't get anything other than an old boot but in this case I found that you know more than you let on. Everyone else accepted what I said but not you. I'll put this information away someplace. Another teacher (law)? A lawyer (constitutional law)? A masters in political science?That’s THE code, right?
Anyway, here is the straight skinny from Cornell.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/15 Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn
This is NOT new news. The audit was approved back on Feb. 11th. And in this case both Republicans AND Democrats trust those performing the audit.
The GOP-controlled Joint Legislative Audit Committee voted along party lines to order the audit to be conducted by the nonpartisan Legislative Audit Bureau. It will examine such issues as how the state maintains its voter rolls and when it allows voters to get absentee ballots without showing identification, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported.
Rep. Samantha Kerkman, a Salem Lakes Republican and co-chairwoman of the committee, said she wanted to make sure voters are confident that elections are fair.
No significant problems were found with Wisconsin’s voting machines after audits and recounts in 2016 and 2020. All of the lawsuits by Trump and his allies alleging widespread problems with the election this year were rejected.
Democrats said they trusted State Auditor Joe Chrisman to handle the proposed review fairly, but that they fear Republicans will use it to disparage an election that Joe Biden won by fewer than 21,000 votes.
https://apnews.com/article/donald-tr...f1f78a695188b5
No claims of computer systems changing votes.
No claims of files being deleted.
No claims of ballots suddenly appearing.
No claim of any fraud at all occuring during the 2020 election.
In fact, there isn't even mention of a recount. Just an investigation centering on voter roles and absentee balloting to ensure the processes in place are working. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
https://t.me/JovanHuttonPulitzer/1312 Originally Posted by bambino
https://t.me/ItalyQanons/2641 Originally Posted by bambino
Update on Georgia ballots: DHS had been trying to move forward this week. Two days ago FBI jumped in claiming jurisdiction. Yesterday 3 PM FBI took control of shredding truck and materials, directed they be returned to shredding operation and the shredding job completed.The FBI demanded that they had jurisdiction of the review of ballots in Georgia. Then yesterday the FBI took control of the shredding truck and materials and demanded the shredding operation be completed.
— Patrick Byrne (@PatrickByrne) January 9, 2021
