Recorded Sessions?

Maybe, maybe not Dorthy. The public vs private thing you're linking to is regarding whether or not it's ok for a third-party to record conversations. What you are probably intending to talk about is a separate issue which is, does the legality of one party consent change if there is a "reasonable expectation of privacy" such as in your own home, hotel room, bedroom, etc?

Even if it does, the Texas wiretap statute is still the one in play, it covers all oral communications.

BTW, I already said all of this in post #22 of this thread as well as linked to the relevant Texas statute.

Texas is a "one party consent state" meaning that as long as one of the parties consents to the recording it's legal. Texas Penal Code § 16.02(c)(4)(a)

I'm not sure how legal it remains though if the other party has a "reasonable expectation to privacy" such as in their own hotel room, bedroom, or during a sexual act. It may become a felony at that point.

Either way, even if it is legal it's fucking creepy and I'm surprised he admitted to it...

**Honesty Alert**I'm not an attorney but I've fucked a couple and stayed at a number of Holiday Inn Express Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

Lol um... Ok? my parents got the shots for me because I'm their son???? Lol

Therefore, you may be able to record in-person conversations occurring in a public place, such as a street or a restaurant, without consent

Fucking a hooker isn't public

Maybe, maybe not Dorthy. The public vs private thing you're linking to is regarding whether or not it's ok for a third-party to record conversations. What you are probably intending to talk about is a separate issue which is, does the legality change if there is a "reasonable expectation of privacy" such as in your own home, hotel room, bedroom, etc?

Even if it does, the Texas wiretap statute is still the one in play, it covers all oral communications.

BTW, I already said all of this in post #22 of this thread as well as linked to the relevant Texas statute. Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

Ok lol

Therefore, you may be able to record in-person conversations occurring in a public place, such as a street or a restaurant, without consent

Fucking a hooker isn't public Originally Posted by Dorthy_Monroe

No, a third uninvolved party can record you on a public street without consent. You can record yourself in private without the other party's consent because Texas is a "one party consent" state.

You're confusing two different things.

Therefore, you may be able to record in-person conversations occurring in a public place, such as a street or a restaurant, without consent.

Grrrr like seriously you just don't get it

There not in public so its illegal Originally Posted by Dorthy_Monroe

No, you don't get it.
http://withoutmyconsent.org/50state/837409625

Just because Dorothy doesn't get it, it's illegal lmfao

You have got so caught up with your lies so much that if you were to tell the story from the beginning you wouldn't be able to.

In the review I posted where you first admitted publicacly of your crazy delusional idea that you're "immune to stds and HIV" you said and I quote:

"I never think about stds since my doctor said I'm immune to stds"

So my question to that would be, why would you need a doctor to tell you this when you already knew you were "immune to stds" since you got this magic, and unreacheable "vaccine" that it was only available to you, when you were born ??

And btw most stds are caused by bacteria that's why they're treatable and have a cure, HIV is cause by a virus, there's NO CURE for viruses. So being "immune to stds" wouldn't automatically make you immune to HIV. The fact that you don't even know that goes to show how uneducated and ignorant you are on the subject.

But then in the same review in another comment you said this:

You sound pretty hot and bothered. However I'm immune to HIV, are you jealous that I was born with better genetics? Most people think they're special(they're all the same) but I actually am. You really sound super salty. You probably did an hour research on this mutation as you don't know anything about it. You just saw my comment and thought "holy shit no way". Don't even know why I'm responding, because I'm better than you.

So from there ^^ you said that your "immunity to HIV" (not stds anymore) is due to fact that you were born with "better genes"
So which one is it ??
Are you a miracle child who was born immune to stds and HIV ?? or your parents found a magic vaccine to make you immune when you were born ???

No, a third party can record you on a public street without consent. You can record yourself in private without the other party's consent because Texas is a "one party consent" state.

You're confusing two different things. Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

Wow thats one of those backdoor loophole laws just meant to set you up for failure lol.

You have got so caught up with your lies so much that if you were to tell the story from the beginning you wouldn't be able to.

In the review I posted where you first admitted publicacly of your crazy delusional idea that you're "immune to stds and HIV" you said and I quote:

"I never think about stds since my doctor said I'm immune to stds"

So my question to that would be, why would you need a doctor to tell you this when you already knew you were "immune to stds" since you got this magic, and unreacheable "vaccine" that it was only available to you, when you were born ??

And btw most stds are caused by bacteria that's why they're treatable and have a cure, HIV is cause by a virus, there's NO CURE for viruses. So being "immune to stds" wouldn't automatically make you immune to HIV. The fact that you don't even know that goes to show how uneducated and ignorant you are on the subject.

But then in the same review in another comment you said this:

You sound pretty hot and bothered. However I'm immune to HIV, are you jealous that I was born with better genetics? Most people think they're special(they're all the same) but I actually am. You really sound super salty. You probably did an hour research on this mutation as you don't know anything about it. You just saw my comment and thought "holy shit no way". Don't even know why I'm responding, because I'm better than you.

So from there ^^ you said that your "immunity to HIV" (not stds anymore) is due to fact that you were born with "better genes"
So which one is it ??
Are you a miracle child who was born immune to stds and HIV ?? or your parents found a magic vaccine to make you immune when you were born ??? Originally Posted by Natalia Mori

Wasn't ready to come out with the shots at that time from what a year ago? Better parents better genetics. Thanks detective

Regarding this "magical STD vaccine", I smell the stench of homeopathy...

You have got so caught up with your lies so much that if you were to tell the story from the beginning you wouldn't be able to.

In the review I posted where you first admitted publicacly of your crazy delusional idea that you're "immune to stds and HIV" you said and I quote:

"I never think about stds since my doctor said I'm immune to stds"

So my question to that would be, why would you need a doctor to tell you this when you already knew you were "immune to stds" since you got this magic, and unreacheable "vaccine" that it was only available to you, when you were born ??

And btw most stds are caused by bacteria that's why they're treatable and have a cure, HIV is cause by a virus, there's NO CURE for viruses. So being "immune to stds" wouldn't automatically make you immune to HIV. The fact that you don't even know that goes to show how uneducated and ignorant you are on the subject.

But then in the same review in another comment you said this:

You sound pretty hot and bothered. However I'm immune to HIV, are you jealous that I was born with better genetics? Most people think they're special(they're all the same) but I actually am. You really sound super salty. You probably did an hour research on this mutation as you don't know anything about it. You just saw my comment and thought "holy shit no way". Don't even know why I'm responding, because I'm better than you.

So from there ^^ you said that your "immunity to HIV" (not stds anymore) is due to fact that you were born with "better genes"
So which one is it ??
Are you a miracle child who was born immune to stds and HIV ?? or your parents found a magic vaccine to make you immune when you were born ??? Originally Posted by Natalia Mori

Hr finally answered that it was a vaccine.

who knows , it's been an hour, it may be back to genetic mutation.

he says though that his parents got it for him, the organization isn't around anymore.

He can;t share the information because of big brother.

In one post he said he wont risk his life to help others, but in another post claims he has no one after him.

I'm not a doctor

but your are so sure you are immune from Aids because of either
a genetic mutation or your were vaccinated with a magical vaccine that only your family has ever heard of??

I'm not a doctor Originally Posted by the cute papi

My suspicion is that neither was the snake oil salesman who conned your parents...