Obama yesterday obfuscated everything againI posted this last week
he is adroit at deflection and casting blame and spreading confusion
yesterday he again tried to confuse us in his patented inimically dismissive style
destroying isis in retribution for their evil does not have anything at all to do with keeping soldiers there long term
that's a separate issue altogether
is he so tied to his plan of getting rid of assad that if isis is destroyed he feels the need to keep troops there so assad will not be strengthened and fill the void?
is isis his expedient counter to assad? Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
someone pronounced it gibberish
now putin has supported my working hypothesis that Obama in essence supports isis and has used it in his animus against assad
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...error-ifx-says
a funny thing I saw the other day....being interviewed on msnbc was a congressman who's district contained the greatest number of Syrian refugees
only thing was he said that these Syrians were largely Christian.
and the more interesting thing was they supported Assad.
because, assad, being of a secular bent , protected Christians from destruction by muslims
Obama supported the muslim brotherhood in egypt, and even now does not cooperate with the Egyptians who rescued Egypt from Obama's chosen henchmen, Libya is the only bombing campaign for which Obama unleashed our power, but in support of the radicals. obama has been wrong at every turn, but the curious thing is, being wrong he's always wrong on the side of the radical muslims