Clesed Thread Repository

That's what I thought as well. . . .


. Originally Posted by rke324

Ditto that!!!

Another example of how the boards plethora of bs rules are selectively and arbitrarily abused and misinterpreted!!!.....

Looks like our Texans had another Oops moment......



In that regards they are at least consistent..... and stay the course......ijs

mary ...just a ...question ...but are ya fuckin ...retarded

Review: Mercie @ Temptations

It makes no sense at all..... But it is a Clesure.....

DDarkness
THE REALLY BAD MOD!



Join Date: Feb 25, 2011
Location: Upstate NY - South of Syr
Posts: 8,428
Reviews: 38


Was moved to Toronto
Thread was moved to Toronto - this is copied for local exposure!

PLEASE post Niagara Fall/Canadian Reviews in The Toronto Forums!

DD
__________________
Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more!

"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war"




John Daly hit a golf ball from Niagara Falls CA to Niagara Falls NY....
Fuckin Texans. Originally Posted by Paulwantsya

Don't know why that one was cleased?!?!?!......
Maybe because it was badly written???

Have we really gone since 10/2 without a clesure???

Bunch of slackers we are if that is true....

Anyways, nice collective job on this one!!

Review: BP Jen

Now that's what I call TEAMWORK!!

Hey it could of been worse if the 3 Amigos rode back into town.....

Sad News
Started by: Angel T
Closed by: Highwayman64

Sad News
Started by: Angel T
Closed by: Highwayman64 Originally Posted by Tiger

as per guidelines

Anyone play on Thanksgiving day?
Started by: Amber Does
Closed by: DDarkness (over name calling & ranting)

Ranting, yes. Name of the game.

Yes yes yes.

DD keeping this thread relevant....

STAFF EDIT ... friendly?

DISGUSTINGGG!
Started by: kellylovejoy2015
Clesed by: Highwayman64

Clesed for: Not an alert (just my guess)

"Done" by justapervert. http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1237531&page=4

I was warned by DDarkmess not to bump coed threads? Whew

"Done" by justapervert. http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1237531&page=4

I was warned by DDarkmess not to bump coed threads? Whew Originally Posted by Carlos Danger

there is no rule on bumping threads
reviews yes
threads or threADs no

We define relevance one post at a time brutha

Hit the old report post button on that PM and let the other mods have at him.
Threads have no time limits on them. If it was a review and nobody posted for thirty days, then it would get the no bumping notation unless you are providing relevant, valuable or updated information about the provider .

Guideline #13 - In our review forums, be mindful of the 'maturity' of threads you are posting to, ie. the date of the last item posted. We ask that you refrain from posting to a review in which the last post was made 30 or more days ago. Some exceptions may apply if you are providing relevant, valuable or updated information about the provider, but as a general rule of thumb, this can best be accomplished by writing a new review altogether and avoiding the bumping of old ones. This applies to our review forums, in particular, as discussion threads are often allowed to flow for an unspecified length of time.






Was it was closed for no reason other than being 30 days (or more) from the post before?

Guideline #22 - ECCIE Staff will go to great lengths to avoid editing, deleting, or censoring our members posts or threads...unless absolutely necessary. Forbidden topics such as underage sex, illicit drugs, bestiality, revealing personal info, medical speculation, or images not in compliance will be removed from public view. Controversial, troublesome, or objectionable posts may draw staff attention or in some cases disciplinary action, but the offending post will not be removed from the view of our membership in any but the most extreme cases. Often times you will find directions, footnotes, or other guidance from staff edited INTO posts which draw our attention. These are for the purpose of educating the readers of what is and what is not acceptable as well as informing others about how these issues have been dealt with. Members are encouraged to RTM posts which include rule infractions or objectionable material if it appears that staff has not already become involved with the thread or post in particular.
Note: Staff will consider a request from the original poster to remove a thread/post they have made provided it was recently posted and not replied to. As a general rule, staff will not consider such requests once a thread or post has been visible for at least 4 hours or received 2 or more replies. In these cases, a request from the OP to lock the thread is more appropriate and will receive consideration.