It's Funny to Watch: Trump Is an Albatross on the Republican Party

Cendell M's Avatar
It's like having 4-5 pitrooms posting in one thread. I just can't believe that among them, not one can admit brandon is a senile old man who belongs in an old folks home. Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN
Any one that say Brandon is a class act is either fucking with you or just plain blind or clearly doesn't keep up with Biden and just ruffling feather

I could careless I feel a bit sorry for all these liberals they’re not to smart in politics
DEAR_JOHN's Avatar
For those who thinks brandons shit doesn't stink, here's another idiotic thing you democrats own. Yep, you own this just like everything else that has fallen since the 'big guy' has ruined our country.

Perhaps your college aged daughter or other college aged friend or kinfolk is being literally tortured by these fucking freaks who will do anything to bring down womanhood.

MSNBC host praises trans sorority member accused of 'peeping,' 'threatening' behavior a 'very brave woman'
Fucking msnbc calls it a woman. Democrats, are you proud of yourselves yet?

https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-...or-brave-woman
  • pxmcc
  • 09-06-2023, 02:41 AM
For those who thinks brandons shit doesn't stink, here's another idiotic thing you democrats own. Yep, you own this just like everything else that has fallen since the 'big guy' has ruined our country.

Perhaps your college aged daughter or other college aged friend or kinfolk is being literally tortured by these fucking freaks who will do anything to bring down womanhood.


Fucking msnbc calls it a woman. Democrats, are you proud of yourselves yet?

https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-...or-brave-woman Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN
the sorority should handle it according to their rules. how would they handle a non-trans woman "leering" at her sorority sisters? use the same standard for this trans person.

you think that doesn't happen? my experience is women are on a bisexual spectrum, whereas dudes are either gay or straight. (guys who claim to be bi aren't actually; they're gay.) i have met gay women, but most gals, if they're honest, from what i've observed, fall somewhere in the middle. i have met 100% straight gals as well, but they're less common than you might expect.

so the sorority should apply their usual rules that each member is subject to when they join; end of story.

fox tries to sensationalize shit like this, where there isn't anything actually sensational happening. the way you deal with weirdos is apply the same rules to everyone, and problem solved. if the rules are ambiguous, then you gotta fix the rules. that some women stare at other women is a simple fact of life. whether that constitutes a violation with penalties depends on the organization.
  • pxmcc
  • 09-06-2023, 10:09 AM
so the way i see this going down is left wing states' secretaries of state declaring that Trump is barred under the 14th Am. Trump and his allies could sue, but they'll begin to realize that in a world with finite resources, this is a waste of money. Trump will never in a million years win Cali, so why bother? good point.

but in the battleground states, different story. most secretaries of state don't wanna have their asses out there fluttering in the wind. so i predict that more reticent SOSs will ask their state AG for guidance, and then will follow the AG's advice. there will be a few battleground AGs who are going to say he's dq'ed, and those SOSs are going to remove Trump from the ballot. the Trump campaign will sue, and after rulings all over the map, the S.C. will have to hear the case. Roberts doesn't like meddling in politics, so his inclination is to side with Trump and let the voters decide. however, the text of the 14th will make it hard for Roberts not to rule on the merits, and in this case, he must, even though he hates likes hell to do it.

so Roberts votes to declare Trump ineligible. this is where things get interesting. although the Court has 6 conservatives-thanks Moscow Mitch-and only 3 liberals, there are actually 3 votes which are up for grab: Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and Barrett. Kavanaugh is the most likely defector. he sided with Roberts on a decision that Georgia electoral maps prevent Blacks from getting their fair share of representation in Georgia's legislature. Roberts had put pressure on him and he buckled, or maybe he found his conscience. the heavily gerrymandered Georgia maps would produce an outcome that doesn't represent the will of the people. Kavanaugh knew it, and had the guts to stand his ground.

if Kavanaugh balks, there are still 2 wildcards: Barrett and Gorsuch. Barrett has voted on principle even when it meant the conservatives took the L. so she isn't to be counted out.

and Gorsuch appears to do his own thing, right wing or no. he has sided against the fed in the matter of Native American rights on multiple occasions; a vote for the dq of Trump by Gorsuch isn't unthinkable, even if not likely.

battleground SOSs should consult the text of the 14th. (i say screw the AG opinion step.) if they conclude Trump is barred, they should announce it from the hilltops. the average U.S. voter doesn't read 100 page law review articles lol, so they have to dumb it down for the masses into just a few key bullet points. (who has time to read political novels? practically no one.) so they should press release their decision and let Trump appeal it to "his" S.C. if Team Trump is lucky, they might be able to delay trial just long enough for their man to escape trial before Nov. 2024. if he gets elected, he pardons himself. if another Repub. wins, the alt-elected Trumpkin will push the DOJ to drop all charges against Trump. and, just like that, Trump will be free to pursue a whole lot more corruption and phuckery. and that, my fellow Americans, is how democracy ends..
DEAR_JOHN's Avatar
fox tries to sensationalize shit like this, where there isn't anything actually sensational happening. the way you deal with weirdos is apply the same rules to everyone, and problem solved. if the rules are ambiguous, then you gotta fix the rules. that some women stare at other women is a simple fact of life. whether that constitutes a violation with penalties depends on the organization. Originally Posted by pxmcc

How would you feel if some queer freak male was in the same locker room leering at your daughter and getting a hard on? I bet you wouldn't have your same cavalier attitude. It took women decades to where they were up until brandon took over, then it only took two years to take away decades worth of work. Face it, you democrats detest women from allowing men to compete in sporting events to invading their locker rooms and dorms.


I'm looking forward to the day where one of the girls gets so upset at being visually raped that some boyfriend just beats the holy fuck out of the shemale freak. It's going to happen sooner or later. Any person born a male doesn't belong anywhere near a girls locker room or competing in a women's sporting event.

DEAR_JOHN's Avatar
MisterMeat's Avatar
MisterMeat's Avatar
MisterMeat's Avatar
MisterMeat's Avatar
The 2024 Presidential election, in a nutshell....
NordicJag's Avatar
DJ, speaking of owning things, how about you owning your prejudice and bigotry.
Now im not the one to defend biden. if his done something illegal, get him on it. I dont think his the best president ever. However, its just funny to watch yall defend trump.

you talk about how "Any person born a male doesn't belong anywhere near a staff edit - UC locker room or competing in a women's sporting event." But it was trump that was caught barging in a woman's staff edit - UC locker room and grope them. You using woman's right and movement to defend trump who has over 20 allege raped charges and openly says things like "when you have money, you can do anything" including rape or grope any woman.

im not about politics be republican or democrate. thats your point of view and right. let it be about the politics not the person running. america is not trump or biden
DEAR_JOHN's Avatar
DJ, speaking of owning things, how about you owning your prejudice and bigotry. Originally Posted by NordicJag

So I don't want mentally impaired shemales in ladies sports or ladies locker room and you sum it all up as being prejudices and bigotry. I want the ladies taken care of and not screwed around with by allowing freaks in the locker room.



It's you brandon supporters with cartel and Staff edit - UC users blood on your hands, not us conservatives. It's you brandon supporters with rapes at the border and lawlessness by defunding the police with blood on your hands. It's you brandon supporters with Afghani blood on your hands by re-arming the taliban. etc.


Ah mister meet, we can play the meme game all night long.
NordicJag's Avatar
No, DJ, you are not prejudice and a bigot because you don't want transgender women in women's locker rooms. There are still some valid concerns being debated on that topic. You are prejudice and a bigot for the use of the terms "mentally impaired" and "freaks".

So, let's look at some figures. Although, there are no exact numbers available because of medical privacy laws, experts in the field have come up with these estimates. At the staff edit - UC level there is approximately one transgender female athlete for every 3000 female athletes. On the collegiate level in the NCAA there is approximately one transgender female athlete for every 2500 female athletes. If you include the NAIA, the ratio is probably closer to that 1 to 3000 figure. it is not like it is happening in mass quantities.

Every time you have one of your bigot fits you say that Democrats own this or that it's all because of President Biden. How do you figure this?
  • pxmcc
  • 09-07-2023, 03:09 AM
Judge clarifies: yup, Trump committed rape. not reasonably disputable, so lets move on to the matter of damages..

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ll-judge-rape/