Selling murdered baby parts for profit and other connected things

WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 08-08-2015, 07:02 AM
Stepped on your dick just now. The Hyde Amendment is the law of the land and PP broke it. Where is your outrage for their lawless acts? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Where? Who has been charged with breaking it?

Every one of you idiots post show you know nothing about the actual law in regards to this issue.

You understand that nobody has even been charged , much less convicted.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
JDrunk is just pissed that tissue is being distributed without him first getting a picture of it.
  • DSK
  • 08-08-2015, 08:16 AM
JDrunk is just pissed that tissue is being distributed without him first getting a picture of it. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
You know that isn't true, and making fun of such a thing shows you are a bad person.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
JDrunk has asked for pictures of other guys tissue...

And in spite of your laughable judgment, we ALL know that there is just one of me, JL!

Obviously you think everybody in here is a lying, stealing, welshing, dishonest prick like you.

Why am I not surprised?
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 08-08-2015, 11:57 AM
JDrunk is just pissed that tissue is being distributed without him first getting a picture of it. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
southtown4488's Avatar
Stepped on your dick just now. The Hyde Amendment is the law of the land and PP broke it. Where is your outrage for their lawless acts? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
The law was broken huh??? yet no one in Texas has charged anyone with this "crime" you claim occurred. Maybe the Texas attorney general doesn't know this law exists hahahaha, just like he claims to not know about the law hes actually charged with breaking. hahahaha
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
The law was broken huh??? yet no one in Texas has charged anyone with this "crime" you claim occurred. Maybe the Texas attorney general doesn't know this law exists hahahaha, just like he claims to not know about the law hes actually charged with breaking. hahahaha Originally Posted by southtown4488
Law enforcement always moves slower than investigative journalists. Didn't you know that? They have to collect their own evidence in accordance with the rules of the game.

The Hyde amendment is also federal and not state. Where are your words on Loretta Lynch?
Yssup Rider's Avatar
JDrunk is promoting yet another of his alcoholic delusions.

That is the only explanation for his repeated erroneous claims... Or else he's simply a bald faced liar.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 08-09-2015, 09:53 AM
Law enforcement always moves slower than investigative journalists. Didn't you know that? They have to collect their own evidence in accordance with the rules of the game.

The Hyde amendment is also federal and not state. Where are your words on Loretta Lynch? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Btw..
The Hyde amendment has nothing to do with this.
lustylad's Avatar
Like it or not abortion has been ruled constitutional by the SCOTUS... Originally Posted by southtown4488
theres already a ban on abortions past the point of viability, that's the SC roe v wade ruling. Originally Posted by southtown4488
You are the biggest fucking idiot on this board. Try to reconcile your two posts, dumbass. They can't both be correct.
.
You are the biggest fucking idiot on this board. Try to reconcile your two posts, dumbass. They can't both be correct.
. Originally Posted by lustylad
They actually COULD both be right, depending on which stage the abortion is performed at.
  • shanm
  • 08-09-2015, 07:30 PM
They actually COULD both be right, depending on which stage the abortion is performed at. Originally Posted by WombRaider
Shhh don't tell Lustyretard. He never made it past the 1st grade.
Shhh don't tell Lustyretard. He never made it past the 1st grade. Originally Posted by shanm
Lusty the not-so-lovable retard.
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
They actually COULD both be right, depending on which stage the abortion is performed at. Originally Posted by WombRaider
So you admit (again) that abortions are being performed in all trimesters.
So you admit (again) that abortions are being performed in all trimesters. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
I never admitted it the first time. 1992s PP v Casey changed the language from 'trimesters' to 'point of viability'. So technically, each case is different and performing an abortion in the 13th week, for example, while outside the first trimester, is not technically considered illegal.