This thread concerns the Biden Family Corruption.
NOT speculation and Whataboutism of others.
Please stay on-topic.
#### Salty
Originally Posted by Salty Again
From what you post, it really isn't.
What *you* supply is speculation and Whataboutism. If you would have named the thread that, it would dovetail beautifully with most every post you make here.
While I would like to comment on your "donny" issue at the end of your post above, I will defer to that in another topic, elsewhere.
...
Originally Posted by FesteredUncle
Beautiful. From the way this thread is going, nobody has posted any court case documents that produce evidence of what the thread is titled.
...
What I did was to quote the entirety of your post and comment on it. So a couple thoughts on that: Can you find a way to be more clear on a consistent basis? Here is the problem: noone else lives in your head, I hope. As such, noone else knows what you are yabbering on about. Though some of your posts are substantially more clear than others, at times, not that they seem consistently on topic however.
...
Originally Posted by FesteredUncle
And here I thought I was being clear, concise and precise. What my "yabbering" pertains to is the topic of this thread. The OP and others "yabber" about is anything but.
So, let us do baby steps here. Topic consist of four words.
The first word is the surname of a family that the OP loves to talk about.
Second word pertains to related to the first word by marriage and/or blood.
Third word is recognized to have three meanings, of which one is considered to be obsolete.
Fourth word I have already given the definition of which comes down to an action or omission which constitutes an offence and is punishable by law.
The combination of the latter two words came about in the late 1960s and means a group working together for common criminal intent.
Now, here is were everyone seems to be ignoring the elephant in the room. A *crime* as defined means punishable by law. No one has shown that the subject of the thread has a case in court or ruling against them. I am not the only one asking for such. The OP and those other who"lives in your head" of the OP have not shown these criminal cases.
...
To that end, it could be that the topic of the thread is the "Biden Crime Syndicate", while you are yabbering on about Trump. OK, so maybe Trump may know what you are thinking because he seems to occupy space in your head constantly. Perhaps because of that rent free living, you may be party or witness to a claim that he has not claimed the in-kind gift on his taxes or something. But I still do not grasp what any of that has do within a thread about the "Biden Crime Syndicate".
Originally Posted by FesteredUncle
Since no one was coming forth showing joey pre-trial diversion paperwork or court cases that were ruled against him, I just presented examples of what I was asking for.
Seems you and the OP are mighty butthurt that the examples I posted, and I remind you again that they meet the conditions of the thread title, are of your buddy.
These example are to help you understand what a few other people are asking for. We just want to see the proof. Nothing more. So, if asking for such is your definition of "yabbering", so be it. That definitly doesn't constitute the mental processes of a frontal cortex 24/7.
It seems those that are in denile about the examples i've given are the ones suffering from TDS.
NOW, if the thread title was "Speculation and Whataboutism of Joey&Co", i'd be humouring myself reading the posted material.
