...But to that specific department of government you list. Seems to support the ease it should be to get those holes sunk in the ground....
Originally Posted by Precious_b
LOL! I got a laugh out of that pithy intro. Need more light heartedness postings here. But we both know that ain't gonna happen.
“The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”
Maybe someone should post a poll for everyone to nominate their favorite and highly efficient and customer focused government agency with highly skilled and efficient workers that provide rapid response times and quick resolutions at low cost. Also, consider the impact of intentional government (partisan at that) slow-walking.
I hope you don't believe what you wrote. Even if one leaps through the Seven Levels of Hell to submit the request, there is ZERO chance they are going to rapidly approve it.
As an example: To own a Class III weapon, that's like silencers, machine guns and short barrel rifles etc, it is pretty simple: Pay for the item, fill out a form and provide the $200 for the tax stamp and viola! Your done.
A-N-D you got nothing to show for it except you are $200 light now. T-h-e-n... maybe... in a year or two or so, you get issued your tax stamp and can now go pick up your device, which has been sitting in a vault the whole time. Now you can use it to your heart's content, according to local/state/federal laws. However, should one not have said tax stamp in your immediate possession when asked for by law enforcement - it's a felony.
Another 2nd amendment example: When purchasing a normal firearm (even if it is one of those
SCARY looking jobbies -
EEEEK!) from a dealer, you fill out a form and submit it. Approval can be instantaneous (like if you have a CC permit) or it can take up to 5 days. Congress specifically placed an 'issue unless'' clause - meaning if there was no apparent reason to reject the request like failed background or criminal record or failed ID matching, then they cannot hold up the request for more than 5 days. That specifically was put in there after much heated debate, name calling, wailing and gnashing of teeth, with the express purpose to keep a later administration from slow walking all requests indefinitely.
I am not aware of any such anti-slow-walking clause in the BLM process. It is entirely subject to partisanship as far as I can tell - though I've never actually attempted the process.