Makes me wonder about the comment that Shine made about buying UC drinks whenever or where ever. Hmmmm could be some protection going on here. Originally Posted by golferguy55Nah I don’t think UC would be seen with a clown like that
Makes me wonder about the comment that Shine made about buying UC drinks whenever or where ever. Hmmmm could be some protection going on here. Originally Posted by golferguy55Nah I don’t think UC would be seen with a clown like that
Then maybe have an administrator take a look. Originally Posted by golferguy55Previously done
Makes me wonder about the comment that Shine made about buying UC drinks whenever or where ever. Hmmmm could be some protection going on here. Originally Posted by golferguy55Unless someone is in the show horse business, can't afford my ticket.
Nah I don’t think UC would be seen with a clown like that Originally Posted by Cendell MBingo
Previously doneShow horse business is a money losing proposition so that excuse won't fly.
Unless someone is in the show horse business, can't afford my ticket.
Bingo Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter
Folks
Admin. has to be able to tie an ip and/or device to another account before action can be taken.
Its frustrating yes. However there are some members really good at catfishing. Making themselves seem like another poster, to cause trouble to others. Thats why admin. has to be cautious. Originally Posted by winn dixie
Cautious about what? This is a privately owned site. Their rules or they can ban you as they see fit. Sorry to tell you Winn but they don't have to be cautious about hurting someone's feelings. Originally Posted by golferguy55I mean they have to be cautious without having ip or device id evidence.
I mean they have to be cautious without having ip or device id evidence.That’s a crock. You’re acting as if there is some legal ramification for banning someone without enough “evidence.” SMH
Originally Posted by winn dixie
Cendell I think you have shown great restraint. You haven't said I told you so even once. Originally Posted by NordicJagI knew other ppl would figure it out it’s Blatantly obvious
That’s a crock. You’re acting as if there is some legal ramification for banning someone without enough “evidence.” SMH Originally Posted by Bowser98
Show horse business is a money losing proposition so that excuse won't fly. Originally Posted by golferguy55Of course that's technically a money loser, but, they can afford my all expenses paid transport vacas.
Actually, in the past, Winn was one of my fav dart boards.But the relevant experience on this topic would be on your side of the fence, not his. This whole idea that actual IP proof of using multiple handles is necessary before banning is hogwash. So let’s say the admins ban someone based on suspicion alone, and if it turns out they were wrong, what ramifications are there for ECCIE? Answer: None whatsoever.
So he speaks from experience. Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter