As I am new to the community, can someone please explain this....

I thought he was talking about Dirk's tits?
SR you can always see Bailey off p411, I've heard Dirk is in the other room, if you ask nice he might show them to you

Why do you have to wait? She advertises on Backpage, and you can still review a banned member as far as I know. We need a set of fresh eyes and a fresh review on her to clear the air. Originally Posted by tpepsi

Ooh! I wasn't aware that she still advertised in BP. Thanks!

I thought he was talking about Dirk's tits?
SR you can always see Bailey off p411, I've heard Dirk is in the other room, if you ask nice he might show them to you Originally Posted by rockerrick

Why would you think that I was speaking about Bailey?

It seems to be a common theme for boyfriends of hooktards to linger while the hooktard is getting plowed, eh Rick?

You may not like what someone has to say, but getting hurt feelings because you feel someone is being a big meanie stating his or her opinion is going to give you an ulcer. Originally Posted by Von Spieler

Love it

http://sanantonio.backpage.com/Femal...iving/12065340

The point here is you were given access and/or had access to ROS. No other variable is needed. It does not matter if you did not like what he said in his review. The facts are simple and straight forward. You are in violation of ROS knowledge and admitted it in open forum. Originally Posted by Von Spieler

Did she really have to break any rules? IF, based on reviews, other hobbiers requested swallow, she said she didn't, they said - OH, you sure did in BigOne's review!

How could she avoid having ROS information if clients tell her?

OY, it's not so much that she somehow acquired that ROS information, (although, it should be), it's the fact that she, allegedly, "quoted", from the ROS in this supposed private message, thereby revealing that she had something she was not supposed to be privvy to; that being, of course, ROS info.

Had she not quoted/mentioned it, she would have been alright. The fact that she did, gave all of the proof needed to warrant disciplinary action.

If memory serves, I thinck on ASPD they used to make the banned party give-up the source of the leak as a condition of their membership being reinstated. THAT, to me, seemed like a GREAT idea as it would act as a deterrent to keep these leakers somewhat in-check.

The way it is here, theres no such policy so the leakers are free to do as they please with the slim and rare chance of ever even getting caught

.

.


.

.

If she didn't give up the monger that spilled the beans, she gets the full brunt of the ban. If she does, then the time is split between the two.

I still like the ASPD version, better. Keep the offending party banned until the source is revealed.

If the time is split between the two, after the source is given up, how long does he lose his Premium Access?..... banned into the afterlife?

.

.

As for the lady who admits in open forum she had ROS knowledge. Enjoy your time sitting on the beach. See you in a few weeks. Originally Posted by Von Spieler

You guys did catch this part right?
The few weeks probably means they know who.

I still like the ASPD version, better. Keep the offending party banned until the source is revealed.

If the time is split between the two, after the source is given up, how long does he lose his Premium Access?..... banned into the afterlife?

.

.

Originally Posted by SofaKingFun

I don't think that his PA is pulled, but it is wasted while he is on the bench.

I had my PA pulled before when I lent a computer to a hooktard and a snoopy ex-mod (who has/had too much time on his hands) thought I was pimping her out and sharing PA and Hooker-Talk access.

snoopy ex-mod (who has/had too much time on his hands) thought I was pimping her out and sharing PA and Hooker-Talk access. Originally Posted by Simon Riley

Damn those snoopy ex-mods

if she wrote you a pm about the ros pm her back about it or ask men in the lounge about how to make your ros better not to make the girls mad lol

She admitted she had ROS.
She refused to give up how.
She not only sent a pm harassing the OP about the ROS but she also sent pm's to others who have reviewed her concerning what they wrote in their review.

Someone is giving her info. She refused to share who so she can stay on BP until she can follow the rules.

As for the validity of this review, it seems it did happen even though it was written on a spare handle of the person who you all have figured out. So it stays. His spare handle is perma banned and his other handle can peruse BP for his vacation.

She does have nice boobies though.

Let's see 3 pages on my phone about a dumb ass WK that thought he was gonna get points by telling a provider what a guy wrote.

Carma is a bitch has already bit him in ass.