Who is responsible in an AGENCY?

Point taken but everyone is responsible for their own goodies - ladies. Communication is important and we will improve on that.....Every bit of info is good and helps us improve.. Originally Posted by sofiaofhouston

No sofia at Neiman-Marcus the Store Manager is responsible for the shopping experience of the guest, not the part time Christmas Santa or that very cure elf that came in from out of town.

rr may not have good manners, but someone at the gold plated coin-op owes him some more sexy times. Saddle up girl.

Did rr just do what I thinck he did? Originally Posted by dearhunter

I am not certain what you think rr did.
Sofia stated what she thought ought to be done if things go badly, i.e. tell the provider or the agency. She then had the temerity to say she does not know what goes on BCD. [Give us a break. I have emails and PMs where she tells me which of her ladies will give me the GFE/MSOG and receive the BFE I like to give.]

Since she interjected herself into the dialogue with a bit of advice, rr asked Sofia what she thinks should be done if the provider or agency is not forthcoming in response to the complaint.

There is nothing wrong with asking a general question in followup from one who has proposed her own idea.

It seems her more recent response is defensive.
I wonder why? (I hope someone will explain this point of sarcasm to Wayward. He has a hard time keeping up.) Does it hit a little close to home for her and her operation?

No disrespect intended towards you, DH.

By the way, what is it you think rr just did?

rr really wants to know what it is that prompted your question.

rr

I have named no names. I have spoken to specific events. I have presented a thread on a general question to a person who has already weighed in on the topic.
There is no error in this approach.
Her response seems to make it personal.
But my question was of a general nature, did not have to be taken personally, and could have been answered in general from her opinion rather than taking a defensive stance.
Why would she be defensive?
Does anyone have any history with this topic that wishes to chime in?

rr Originally Posted by randyrogue

Okay rr then choose coward or lier, did this really happen to you or not?

Many of us have history with this and that is why so many have counseled you to bring your own manglove when going on pleasure safari. Most of us when not openly laughing at you, assume from all of your escort like drama that you want attention and we are trying to give you some.

I would have asked for a bbbjtc for round two and then the condoms would have started magically falling from the heavens of the coin-op.

Let's all get one thing straight WW no one agreed to anything on the phone or anywhere else. Second what's your obsession with the other website. The YMWV.You even signed me up without my knowledge and emailed me my password and log in...I have never used it...i don't think this is a ThreAD but something that needed to be brought to our attention. I appreciate the information.

Okay rr then choose coward or lier, did this really happen to you or not?

Many of us have history with this and that is why so many have counseled you to bring your own manglove when going on pleasure safari. Most of us when not openly laughing at you, assume from all of your escort like drama that you want attention and we are trying to give you some.

I would have asked for a bbbjtc for round two and then the condoms would have started magically falling from the heavens of the coin-op. Originally Posted by Wayward

Again, Wayward, you speak from ignorance which is why I hope you will refrain from offering advice to me EVER. You have nothing positive to offer, only rants and trash talk,, and no credibility with me.

Read the review again and you will see that I reported having asked for and having promptly received BBBJ after the first cover had been used; and I also reiterated that point in another thread. VOILA! No gloves came falling from the heavens of the coin-op. There goes your theory IGNORAMUS! And I was very much pleasured for the entire time. HOWEVER . . .

Whether the shortfall of supplies was an oversight or by design is not the point of this thread.
The question is WHO IS RESPONSIBLE in the opinion of the readers at hand. You have aimed your worthless opinion at me, not the question.

Go back underneath your rock, and put your big toe back into your mouth so you will quit embarrassing yourself by talking.

Just my 2 cents here.

The way I see it, if I was running my own business and had employees then I would be responsible for everything that goes on with that business. However if I contracted some of the work out and provided the space for those contracted to perform or produce their work then the contractors would be responsible for what they do or provide. Also whether it was an employee or contractor it would depend on what we all agreed who was responsible for what. The only ones who know who's responsible for what is the person who owns the business and those employed or contracted. Now that those who are involved now know what happened for sure, maybe they will be able to resolve the issue and make it a better business. Fortunately I have never had this issue. Just my 2cents

WW It's neither your visit nor your concern. I have made an offer for RR to email me and we can rectify the matter. I don't think I'm being defensive. I am actually making an offer you know nothing of and will not know the details of. It's not your concern but between RR and myself...

One thing is clear..WW has an agenda to corner you to admit every detail. Since he signed me up for another website and emailed me the password and log in I have no idea who he is. YES HE SIGNED ME UP FOR HIS Y WHATEVER SITE AND I HAVE NOT NOR WILL POST THERE. HE DID THIS IN MY NAME AND EMAILED ME MY LOG IN AND PASSWORD...IF YOUR AN IMPOSTOR THERE WHAT CAN WE ASSUME HERE? For all I know he is someone who should not know the details if you know what I mean.........
WW it's clear you are a BK for anything I am even mentioned in. I chimed in on this because I like to know what we can do better.....I wonder who you are? Has anyone actually met you? People have met me at socials and such....Do you have reviews up? Whatever pertains to me seems to hit really close to home to you.........It really should not unless you have some other agenda, other than signing people up on websites without their knowledge or consent........unless you have a vested interest in something else.

Just my 2 cents here.

The way I see it, if I was running my own business and had employees then I would be responsible for everything that goes on with that business. However if I contracted some of the work out and provided the space for those contracted to perform or produce their work then the contractors would be responsible for what they do or provide. Also whether it was an employee or contractor it would depend on what we all agreed who was responsible for what. The only ones who know who's responsible for what is the person who owns the business and those employed or contracted. Now that those who are involved now know what happened for sure, maybe they will be able to resolve the issue and make it a better business. Fortunately I have never had this issue. Just my 2cents Originally Posted by jwbll

and since we are a Co-op I will address the matter with all involved to keep all parties happy...

The question is WHO IS RESPONSIBLE in the opinion of the readers at hand. You have aimed your worthless opinion at me, not the question. Originally Posted by randyrogue

YOU ARE!


And bringing it up "hypothetically" on a public discussion board left it open for all to discuss, including who the players were.

Wayward, you are a terrible baby sitter! Look what you have done!

I think WayWard is warming-up his possum throwing arm. Lol

Again, Wayward, you speak from ignorance which is why I hope you will refrain from offering advice to me EVER. You have nothing positive to offer, only rants and trash talk,, and no credibility with me.

Read the review again and you will see that I reported having asked for and having promptly received BBBJ after the first cover had been used; and I also reiterated that point in another thread. VOILA! No gloves came falling from the heavens of the coin-op. There goes your theory IGNORAMUS! And I was very much pleasured for the entire time. HOWEVER . . .

Whether the shortfall of supplies was an oversight or by design is not the point of this thread.
The question is WHO IS RESPONSIBLE in the opinion of the readers at hand. You have aimed your worthless opinion at me, not the question.

Go back underneath your rock, and put your big toe back into your mouth so you will quit embarrassing yourself by talking. Originally Posted by randyrogue

So what was this thread about again rr?

Lets see if we can wade past the shouting and the name calling, you busted a nut with a cover and then got your second nut with a bbbjtc but you started a thread about how horrible this all was and how we need to find out who is responsible for this unfortunate series of events?

I heard it was a lone gunman.

rr for what it's worth I never read the BCD portion of the review in the first place was just guessing based on your half sane board persona. Looks like I was mistaken and you are a golden god. But you really need to rethink calling anyone an "IGNORAMUS!" because that is very hurtful. rr you may think that is the point of this thread and I may think something completely different. Watching you have another meltdown for example is kind of funny.

So how about this it's 47.3% your fault for not bringing a cover(s) on big pleasure safari, 24.7% sofia's fault and that would leave 28% to the provider at the coin-op? Is that really the point you were looking for as captain of this threAd.

Now let's see how Father Wayward has done so far, meltdowns 2, silly name calling by little girls 1, big girls 1, sofia posting wackiness off topic stuff that belongs in the threAd she started 2 (when I started writing) and oh yeah truth about what really happened and why your panties are in a wad this week for the folks that don't have BCD? well too many to count.

So who should be the Captain of this threAd rr?

Let's all get one thing straight WW no one agreed to anything on the phone or anywhere else. Second what's your obsession with the other website. The YMWV.You even signed me up without my knowledge and emailed me my password and log in...I have never used it...i don't think this is a ThreAD but something that needed to be brought to our attention. I appreciate the information. Originally Posted by sofiaofhouston

Sofia, In the words of a certain Member of Congress,
"You lie". And you know what I mean and that I can prove it.
You have unnecessarily personalized this general interest topic.
By doing so you have opened a can of worms for yourself.

I realize you are probably trying to maintain plausible deniability, but since this is all fantasy having occurred in cyberspace and our imaginations, and no specific event can be identified . . .

Second, you are confusing things by introducing your drama from another thread into this thread. I ask you to JUST STOP IT, please. One topic at a time.
Again I ask you to either stay on topic or keep out of it, please.

This thread does not have to be about you, but from your defensive tone, perhaps you could learn a bit from it, as also indicated by what I have read on the boards in recent days.

Back to the question, Who is responsible . . .?


Some have said the provider, some the appt taker, some the client.

I say again I shall carry my favorite brand to each adventure into this playground. Call it pleasure insurance.

I think the provider (whether indie or in an agency) has a personal interest in making sure her incall site will be amply provisioned with all supplies necessary to stoke the fires of the imagination, as a matter of customer service. Price may make the sale, but service creates the repeat customer.

I think the appt taker has a lot at stake as with any business operation, to make certain her facility is amply provisioned, and that co-op partners are availing themselves of all the supplies at hand to ensure the product is delivered with the highest quality. Price may make the sale, but the customer comes back for the quality and value of the product.

But to NOT deliver the product promised, and to try to deflect blame on others will undermine any business venture by driving away clients and ruining the reputation of the business.

Think TOYOTA!

To each his own.
This thread did not begin about rr.
Again some have chosen to take that spin, foolishly.
It is about the community, the hobby experience.

Best regards.

LTGR!

rr

WW It's neither your visit nor your concern. I have made an offer for RR to email me and we can rectify the matter. I don't think I'm being defensive. I am actually making an offer you know nothing of and will not know the details of. It's not your concern but between RR and myself...

One thing is clear..WW has an agenda to corner you to admit every detail. Since he signed me up for another website and emailed me the password and log in I have no idea who he is. YES HE SIGNED ME UP FOR HIS Y WHATEVER SITE AND I HAVE NOT NOR WILL POST THERE. HE DID THIS IN MY NAME AND EMAILED ME MY LOG IN AND PASSWORD...IF YOUR AN IMPOSTOR THERE WHAT CAN WE ASSUME HERE? For all I know he is someone who should not know the details if you know what I mean.........
WW it's clear you are a BK for anything I am even mentioned in. I chimed in on this because I like to know what we can do better.....I wonder who you are? Has anyone actually met you? People have met me at socials and such....Do you have reviews up? Whatever pertains to me seems to hit really close to home to you.........It really should not unless you have some other agenda, other than signing people up on websites without their knowledge or consent........unless you have a vested interest in something else. Originally Posted by sofiaofhouston

sofia you PMed and emailed me to join the Y, if you are having problems with your log in or password then I'll be happy to help you.

sofia my sweet I think we have met, not completely sure because you change names and positions so often.

Now really to make the Mods jobs easier these posts should go [ame="http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=17575"]in the ThreAd you started.[/ame]

You look very pretty today sofia.

No sofia at Neiman-Marcus the Store Manager is responsible for the shopping experience of the guest, not the part time Christmas Santa or that very cure elf that came in from out of town.

rr may not have good manners, but someone at the gold plated coin-op owes him some more sexy times. Saddle up girl. Originally Posted by Wayward

Actually... Sofia isn't Neiman Marcus... she's more like the Galleria, providing an upscale location for Neiman Marcus and it's customers to do whatever Neiman Marcus and their customers choose to do. The Manager at Neiman Marcus is responsible for the interactions of Neiman Marcus and their customers, not the Galleria management.

Strangely... I have a sudden urge to park my car in Sofia's ...er...uh.. the Galleria's ... underground parking....

This thread did not begin about rr.
Again some have chosen to take that spin, foolishly.
It is about the community, the hobby experience.

Best regards.

LTGR!

rr Originally Posted by randyrogue

Seriously? rr do you really believe that? It's not all about you?

Really am going to have to throw a possum at this one.