Criminal Inquiry Is Sought in Hildabeast's Email Account

Most habitual liars state their lies unequivocally to get you to believe them. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

And they don't quote sources.

Nor do they pretend there's another side to the story.

Sound familiar JDrunk?

New York Times alters Clinton email story

" One of the reporters of the story, Michael Schmidt, explained early Friday that the Clinton campaign had complained about the story to the Times."

http://www.politico.com//blogs/media...ry-211176.html

New York Times alters Clinton email story
By DYLAN BYERS 7/24/15 4:58 AM EDT

The New York Times made small but significant changes to an exclusive report about a potential criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton's State Department email account late Thursday night, but provided no notification of or explanation for of the changes.

The paper initially reported that two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation "into whether Hillary Rodham Clinton mishandled sensitive government information on a private email account she used as secretary of state."

That clause, which cast Clinton as the target of the potential criminal probe, was later changed: the inspectors general now were asking for an inquiry "into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state."

The Times also changed the headline of the story, from "Criminal Inquiry Sought in Hillary Clinton’s Use of Email" to "Criminal Inquiry Is Sought in Clinton Email Account," reflecting a similar recasting of Clinton's possible role. The article's URL was also changed to reflect the new headline.

As of early Friday morning, the Times article contained no update, notification, clarification or correction regarding the changes made to the article.

One of the reporters of the story, Michael Schmidt, explained early Friday that the Clinton campaign had complained about the story to the Times.

“It was a response to complaints we received from the Clinton camp that we thought were reasonable, and we made them,” Schmidt said.

Nick Merrill, a spokesman for Clinton, said in an email that Clinton always followed “appropriate practices.”

“Contrary to the initial story, which has already been significantly revised, she followed appropriate practices in dealing with classified materials. As has been reported on multiple occasions, any released emails deemed classified by the administration have been done so after the fact, and not at the time they were transmitted,” Merrill said.

The inspectors general request comes after their assessment that Clinton’s private email account contained “hundreds of potentially classified emails.” The Times' report notes that it is not clear whether the contents of the emails were marked as classified by the State Department when then-Secratry of State Clinton sent or received them.

Clinton's use of a private email account at the State Department has been a subject of intense scrutiny by both the media and Republican adversaries for months. No news outlet has been more aggressive in its coverage of that issue than the Times.

The Times' report also includes the following error: It states that a hearing in Washington about the State Department's refusal to respond to Freedom of Information Act requests had taken place on Monday. That hearing took place last week.

UPDATE (2:12 p.m.): The Times issued the following correction on Friday:

"An earlier version of this article and an earlier headline, using information from senior government officials, misstated the nature of the referral to the Justice Department regarding Hillary Clinton’s personal email account while she was secretary of state. The referral addressed the potential compromise of classified information in connection with that personal email account. It did not specifically request an investigation into Mrs. Clinton."

UPDATE (3:36 p.m.): Jennifer Werner, a Democratic spokesperson for the Select Committee on Benghazi, told the On Media blog that the State Inspector General "did not ask for any kind of investigation, criminal or otherwise." Werner said the referral "went from the Intelligence Community IG to the FBI."

For that reason, Werner said the Times was wrong to report that two inspectors general had asked the Justice Department to open an investigation.

Times spokesperson Eileen Murphy did not respond to a request for comment.

It's well known that the Clinton's have an RTM button to the NYT and CNN. They press it more often that WRTM.

It's well known that the Clinton's have an RTM button to the NYT and CNN. Originally Posted by gnadfly

It's also "well known that the" Turd Munchin' Turdfly is a fuk'n Idiot!

You brought it up. Don't worry, you and Wormy are free to marry now. I know a baker you can call. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

And they haven't even acknowledged the brown sheets that were sent to them as a wedding gift, much less said "Thank you" for them ! Typical lib fags think that they're "owed" them and entitled to them !

“Get Amy! Somebody get Amy on this!”

Amy being a likely reference to New York Times reporter, Amy Chozick, a particularly Clinton-friendly advocate at that influential publication.


Read more at http://dcwhispers.com/hillary-clinto...XgOTvZYblFk.99







.

Typical IBIdiot LIE. Fabricated name. Headline amateurishly written.

Glib or just plain dumb?

Dipshit of the Year, the elder... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You are engaging in self-promotion??

Keep chasing imaginary boogeymen. . . just like Ken Star chased Bill Clintons dick. . . no one cares. hahaha. . . "but she used her email at home!!!" whaaaa. haha keep crying, you will be ignored like the spoiled children that you are.

Keep chasing imaginary boogeymen. . . just like Ken Star chased Bill Clintons dick. . . no one cares. hahaha. . . "but she used her email at home!!!" whaaaa. haha keep crying, you will be ignored like the spoiled children that you are. Originally Posted by southtown4488

The NYT bungled the story. Big surprise. And IBchickenshit, in his orgasmic haste to start turning Hillary on the spit, shit the bed, again.



http://www.cbsnews.com/news/no-crimi...doj-clarifies/

How's this for a bumper sticker?..... "The Bitch Is In The Ditch"

How's this for a bumper sticker?..... "The Bitch Is In The Ditch" Originally Posted by Jackie S

That's good but how about this?

"The Bitch is up WTF's Rump and He Likes it"...

Keep chasing imaginary boogeymen. . . just like Ken Star chased Bill Clintons dick. . . no one cares. hahaha. . . "but she used her email at home!!!" whaaaa. haha keep crying, you will be ignored like the spoiled children that you are. Originally Posted by southtown4488

Try again, suck-clown:

Hildabeast’s standing falls among Democrats amid questions about her honesty.

By LISA LERER and EMILY SWANSON, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Hildabeast's standing is falling among Democrats, and voters view her as less decisive and inspiring than when she launched her presidential campaign just three months ago, according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll.

The survey offers a series of warning signs for the leading Democratic candidate. Most troubling, perhaps, for her prospects are questions about her compassion for average Americans, a quality that fueled Odumbo's two White House victories.

Just 39 percent of all Americans have a favorable view of Hildabeast, compared to nearly half who say they have a negative opinion of her. That's an eight-point increase in her unfavorable rating from an AP-GfK poll conducted at the end of April. (USNews)

The NYT bungled the story. Big surprise. And IBchickenshit, in his orgasmic haste to start turning Hillary on the spit, shit the bed, again.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/no-crimi...doj-clarifies/ Originally Posted by WombRaider

It was the NYT that "hastily" published the original and correct story, and it has now chosen to kowtow to Hildabeast, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, but that doesn't change the fact that the Inspector General has already identified the criminal offense, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

Try again, suck-clown:








It was the NYT that "hastily" published the original and correct story, and it has now chosen to kowtow to Hildabeast, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, but that doesn't change the fact that the Inspector General has already identified the criminal offense, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

It was YOU who couldn't wait to believe the initial story was true and probably jizzed all over your keyboard whilst hastily typing the initial post. In true IB fashion, you've tried to shift the subject again. This thread was started in response to a possible criminal investigation, not her poll numbers or standing among democrats. You shat the bed on the investigation and now you're trying to move the target to something else. Nice try, chickenshit, we can all see what you're doing. You LOSE.

Dance you chicken dick motherfucker, dance

It was YOU who couldn't wait to believe the initial story was true and probably jizzed all over your keyboard whilst hastily typing the initial post. In true IB fashion, you've tried to shift the subject again. This thread was started in response to a possible criminal investigation, not her poll numbers or standing among democrats. You shat the bed on the investigation and now you're trying to move the target to something else. Nice try, chickenshit, we can all see what you're doing. You LOSE.

Dance you chicken dick motherfucker, dance Originally Posted by WombRaider

Transmitting classified material on an insecure net is a criminal act, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.