Freedom of the press?

ROFLMAO

the idiots STILL don't get it

The GOP is not an entity of the state, CBJ7. It can pick and choose who is allowed access: just like Odumbo did last week when he denied admission to a group of College Republicans at the University of Central Missouri. By your reckoning, Odumbo violated their right to assemble under the First Amendment. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Your information must have come from a certain news source.


“It appeared as though we were standing there saying ‘No, you can’t come in.’ We weren’t saying anything,” University of Central Missouri Interim Chief Communications Officer Dennis Cryder told Campus Safety magazine. “The Secret Service was saying, ‘No one can come in. We don’t care if you are the king of England, the College Republicans or whoever you may be.’”
The chairperson of UCM’s Young Republicans confirmed Cryder’s comments to the New York Daily News. She added that other individuals besides the College Republicans in question were also turned away because they were too late.
She did claim that a security guard who was not affiliated with UCM made a “snarky comment” that the half dozen GOP students didn’t respect the need for presidential security.
On Monday, six members of the College Republicans told the College Fix that they were confused by the “extreme security precautions,” which kept them from hearing the president's speech in person.

http://www.campussafetymagazine.com/...ma-Speech.aspx

ROFLMAO

the idiots STILL don't get it Originally Posted by CJ7

You're still a fucking moron, CBJ7.

Your information must have come from a certain news source.


“It appeared as though we were standing there saying ‘No, you can’t come in.’ We weren’t saying anything,” University of Central Missouri Interim Chief Communications Officer Dennis Cryder told Campus Safety magazine. “The Secret Service was saying, ‘No one can come in. We don’t care if you are the king of England, the College Republicans or whoever you may be.’”
The chairperson of UCM’s Young Republicans confirmed Cryder’s comments to the New York Daily News. She added that other individuals besides the College Republicans in question were also turned away because they were too late.
She did claim that a security guard who was not affiliated with UCM made a “snarky comment” that the half dozen GOP students didn’t respect the need for presidential security.
On Monday, six members of the College Republicans told the College Fix that they were confused by the “extreme security precautions,” which kept them from hearing the president's speech in person.

http://www.campussafetymagazine.com/...ma-Speech.aspx Originally Posted by lostincypress

Were they denied entrance? YES!

And their version of events is significantly different.http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...asons-sterling

[QUOTE=I B Hankering;1053560450]You're still a fucking moron, CBJ7.

Were they denied entrance? YES!

And their version of events is significantly different.http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...asons-sterling[/QUOT

Yes, they were denied entry along with everyone else who arrived TOO LATE. Oh, there were six not ten.

"Kailea Bogner, the UCM College Republicans chairperson, added that it wasn’t just College Republicans who were turned away."

The chairperson of the UCM Young Republicans similarly refuted Scott’s account, telling the Daily News a group of young GOPers staged a protest before the speech and they were too late when they tried to enter the venue where Obama was speaking.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/poli...#ixzz2b9CkYlTu


When asked if she thinks their partisan affiliation did actually play a role in their being turned away, Scott demurred.


“I don’t want to make allegations, I don’t have enough proof behind it. Do I think I can know if it was for partisan reasons? No, I don’t think so. But do I think it was enough to at least be suspicious? Definitely.”

CJ, if you believe their constitutional rights are or were violated, why don't you contact the ACLU, and suggest that they sue the RNC?

Perhaps, because, well, no constitutional rights were infringed. In no way has the RNC prohibited the networks from showing whatever the hell they want to show.

Try something else that makes sense, because this was a non-starter, presented as you did.

[QUOTE=lostincypress;1053560561]

You're still a fucking moron, CBJ7.

Were they denied entrance? YES!

And their version of events is significantly different.http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...asons-sterling[/QUOT

Yes, they were denied entry along with everyone else who arrived TOO LATE. Oh, there were six not ten.

"Kailea Bogner, the UCM College Republicans chairperson, added that it wasn’t just College Republicans who were turned away."

The chairperson of the UCM Young Republicans similarly refuted Scott’s account, telling the Daily News a group of young GOPers staged a protest before the speech and they were too late when they tried to enter the venue where Obama was speaking.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/poli...#ixzz2b9CkYlTu Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Yeah! Suffice it to say that that's the revised, lib-retard rendition, and it's not what the students claim happened.

BTW, never stated a 'number', so your 'edification' is as superfluous as it is unwarranted.

CJ, if you believe their constitutional rights are or were violated, why don't you contact the ACLU, and suggest that they sue the RNC?

Perhaps, because, well, no constitutional rights were infringed. In no way has the RNC prohibited the networks from showing whatever the hell they want to show.

Try something else that makes sense, because this was a non-starter, presented as you did. Originally Posted by LNK

later in the thread I clearly stated the GOP has done nothing to be guilty of.

try reading the thread before you post, it makes sense

So you start from a false premise, then whack people when they call you on it?

Great technique. Wish we could have used that one in debate.

Like I said, this was a non-starter. Try again.

You're still a fucking moron, CBJ7.

Were they denied entrance? YES!

And their version of events is significantly different.http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...asons-sterling Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Typical half truth. Were they denied entrance because they were repulicans? No. They were deni d because they didn't get there in time for security screening. Anyone of any party who has dealt with the sec serv is quite familiar with those issues, and knows the ss doesn't give a damn what party you belong to. They are selected because they are rather single minded sobs.

Typical half truth. Were they denied entrance because they were repulicans? No. They were deni d because they didn't get there in time for security screening. Anyone of any party who has dealt with the sec serv is quite familiar with those issues, and knows the ss doesn't give a damn what party you belong to. They are selected because they are rather single minded sobs. Originally Posted by Old-T

Yeah. Lib-retards are masters at crafting half-truths and whole cloth lies.

So you start from a false premise, then whack people when they call you on it?

Great technique. Wish we could have used that one in debate.

Like I said, this was a non-starter. Try again. Originally Posted by LNK

I started with a question.. rather than debate the question the rightwingers hit their knees and shook like a bowl of Jello in an earthquake making excuses. The very thing the rightwingers bitch about the dems doing ... take you for instance.

I started with a question.. rather than debate the question the rightwingers hit their knees and shook like a bowl of Jello in an earthquake making excuses. The very thing the rightwingers bitch about the dems doing ... take you for instance. Originally Posted by CJ7

No one was 'quaking', CBJ7. Everyone was just pointing out that you're a moronic punk.

Yeah. Lib-retards are masters at crafting half-truths and whole cloth lies. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

there you have it ... IB is a Lib-retard.

among many other things, all of which suck ..

there you have it ... IB is a Lib-retard.

among many other things, all of which suck .. Originally Posted by CJ7

Says the moronic lib-retard CBJ7 with an avatar that is the definition of twin-engine SUCKING!!!

Says the moronic lib-retard CBJ7 with an avatar that is the definition of twin-engine SUCKING!!! Originally Posted by I B Hankering

..........and responses such as this would be the very reason that I B earned the last name of Idiot!