Clearly? Laz, there's no such thing as "clearly" when you're interpreting a statute. "Fee" and "for hire" under the Texas prostitution statute mean something of value given to a person who sells sex for a living. I guess it's within the range of my wild imagine to speculate a trial in which the fee was a review, but I'm odd because I can also envision blue monkeys flying out my butt. In other words, it's highly unlikely the DA would pursue a case against a provider when the only fee was a review.
Originally Posted by ShysterJon
But SJ,
Isn't it also true that the standard fine for a first prostitution offense is around $450 and looking at the jailbase website where you can search by offense and see who is locked up, I doubt many who get actually arrested/cited for simply prostitution without any other additional charges such as things we can't talk about, would rather pay the fine and get back to work? Even looking at the DPD site where they show a lot of names of people cited for that, how many actually bother to get an attorney and fight the citation?
I'm guessing it is a numbers game and for a huge percentage of citations, the vast number do not fight it. They pay the ticket and get back to work ASAP. So the DA has plenty of time and resources to present something like that to prove a point and especially in an election year, the inclination to make headlines that shows they are doing SOMETHING about what society thinks of as a scourge against society and women.